If I recall correctly part of the LSB requires using the rpm package
format... if that's a requirement preventing debian from being certified
i'm not too sure i'm interested in the LSB...
Todd
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 21:21, Jason Lim wrote:
> Dear Joey,
>
>
> This pa
ting support from an LSB
certified tech they might just say "install this rpm..." rather then
know the more appropriate solution for debian (which might just be "grab
this deb from the archive").
Todd
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 02:17, Alex Borges (lex) wrote:
> El mié, 09
ioned previously, rpm support is available, it is not the preferred
method of package installation which seems to be what the LSB wants.
Todd
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 08:31, Gene Grimm wrote:
> From: "Todd Charron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I would much prefer the LSB to
apt-cache search djbdns
djbdns-installer - Source only package for building djbdns
is that what you're looking for? Was quite easy to install (like the
equiv qmail deb package).
Todd
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 13:48, Matt Andreko wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but why is tinydns/qmail/etc under a re
Hello,
I had this same problem. You have to subscribe to your INBOX, exit
evolution, run killev (to be safe) then try going back in.
http://www.mail-archive.com/evolution-hackers@ximian.com/msg01943.html
Todd
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 13:39, Justin Ryan wrote:
> Heya all..
>
> I've got a serve
You'll have to look at your httpd.conf (in /etc/apache/ )
You'll have to uncomment several sections for php to start working.
The LoadModule section php4
The two file type lines for php4
and you might want to add index.php to the list of allowed index files
After that, restart apache and you sho
Hi,
I was wondering if any of you have any experience running a game server
under Debian. Also wondering if you know the CPU/memory/bandwidth
requirements of such a project. Thanks,
Todd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
The actual game may be a moving target (that's the problem). Basically
it will probably start off as a UT or Counterstrike server, but may
evolve as newer titles come out or as customers request it.
Todd
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 11:34, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:15, Todd
olds 15-20
clients. (This is in an ISP environment).
Todd
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 11:47, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:37, Todd Charron wrote:
> > The actual game may be a moving target (that's the problem). Basically
> > it will probably start off as a UT or Coun
Hi,
For me a mix of qmail and fetchmail worked beautifully until I got a
static (at which point fetchmail was no longer required). I did it all
with one machine but if you really want you could use two (though I
don't see the point). Fetchmail would retrieve the messages when
connected and q
Hello all,
I've recently been charged with migrating a redhat linux server
running livingston radius to a new machine running debian 3.0.
So far all is well except for radius. We have been unable to get it
to authenticate any users when radtest'ing from a remote machine (since
for some reason
Yup, mine did too.
Todd
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 23:24, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:48:35PM -0500, David Stanaway wrote:
> > This is a phoney email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), would the
> > originator please step forward and offer an explanation.
>
> I'm assuming your MTA did
If I recall correctly part of the LSB requires using the rpm package
format... if that's a requirement preventing debian from being certified
i'm not too sure i'm interested in the LSB...
Todd
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 21:21, Jason Lim wrote:
> Dear Joey,
>
>
> This pac
ting support from an LSB
certified tech they might just say "install this rpm..." rather then
know the more appropriate solution for debian (which might just be "grab
this deb from the archive").
Todd
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 02:17, Alex Borges (lex) wrote:
> El mié, 09-10-2002
ioned previously, rpm support is available, it is not the preferred
method of package installation which seems to be what the LSB wants.
Todd
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 08:31, Gene Grimm wrote:
> From: "Todd Charron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I would much prefer the LSB to
Hi,
I've been trying to set up an LVS with 2 directors and 2 real servers. I've
built the kernel from the 2.4.18 sources in stable along with the patch
kernel-patch-2.4-ipvs. However, I can't seem to find the hidden devices
patch in the archive. Does one exist? Or is there another place I
2003 04:14 pm, Michael Loftis wrote:
> Uhm, I'm not sure where it is anymore but I do have some patches that apply
> more or less cleanly.
>
> The 'approved' method in 2.4 is to use arp filters.
>
> --On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 15:49 -0500 Todd Ch
Hi,
I've been trying to set up an LVS with 2 directors and 2 real servers. I've
built the kernel from the 2.4.18 sources in stable along with the patch
kernel-patch-2.4-ipvs. However, I can't seem to find the hidden devices
patch in the archive. Does one exist? Or is there another place I
2003 04:14 pm, Michael Loftis wrote:
> Uhm, I'm not sure where it is anymore but I do have some patches that apply
> more or less cleanly.
>
> The 'approved' method in 2.4 is to use arp filters.
>
> --On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 15:49 -0500 Todd Ch
19 matches
Mail list logo
