If I recall correctly part of the LSB requires using the rpm package format... if that's a requirement preventing debian from being certified i'm not too sure i'm interested in the LSB...
Todd On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 21:21, Jason Lim wrote: > Dear Joey, > > ---------------------------- > This package provides an implementation of version 1.1.0 of the Linux > Standard Base for Debian on the Intel x86 architecture with the Linux > kernel. Future revisions may support the LSB on additional architectures > and kernels. > > The intent of this package is to provide a best current practice way of > installing and running LSB packages on Debian GNU/Linux. Its presence does > not imply that we believe that Debian fully complies with the Linux > Standard Base, and should not be construed as a statement that Debian is > LSB-compliant. > ---------------------------- > > That does not address what I was talking about. _EVEN IF_ Debian had a > hack or such which allowed it to appear compatible/compliant, it isn't > certified, is it? And back to my original topic... if it isn't officially > compliant, vendors won't support it. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joey Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <debian-isp@lists.debian.org> > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:48 AM > Subject: Re: LSB and Debian, Commercial perspective > > Jason Lim wrote: > > What are your thoughts on this? > > I think you should perhaps apt-get install lsb and read the > README.Debian. > > -- > see shy jo > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
