LOL dude! :) If u think I was calling anyone a thief u read something that
I didn't type. The idea of what is thievery or allowed use rests solely in
the mind of his customers. In this arena whatever *they* say goes. Forgive
me if I used overly colloquial meanings of steal and thief. :)
At 08
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Chris Wagner wrote:
> The idea of what is thievery or allowed use rests solely in the mind
> of his customers.
Well, that's exactly the attitude I'm objecting to! Sure, they have as
much right to try and stop me doing things they don't want as I have
the right to actual
At 09:29 AM 3/19/02 +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>> In this arena whatever *they* say goes.
>
>Not when we're talking about what's criminal and what's not.
Yes, that's true, but is irrelevant for his situation. His web hosts are
coming to him saying "we want X". Whatever X is, whether that's
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 05:17 AM, Jason Lim wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 21:11:20 +1100, Toby Thain wrote:
>>> spaz:~# apt-get update
>>
>>> spaz:~# apt-get install apt
>>> Reading Package Lists... Done
>>> Building Dependency Tree... Done
>>> Sorry, apt is already the newest ver
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Chris Wagner wrote:
> At 09:29 AM 3/19/02 +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> >> In this arena whatever *they* say goes.
> >
> >Not when we're talking about what's criminal and what's not.
>
> Yes, that's true, but is irrelevant for his situation. His web hosts are
> coming to
Your sources.list must not be correct then, or something is fubared
somewhere.
Try this...
rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
then make SURE /etc/apt/sources.list is correct.
Then update the package list, and try and get dpkg first, then apt.
That should work. Let us all know the result.
- Ori
Hi all, I'm triying to do the next setup ...
Inet <-> Sid FW (Pc1,eth1-inet,eth0-lan) <-> Sid PPTPd (Pc2,eth0-lan)
On the PC1 I have done this
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p gre -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2
iptables -t na
Hi all, I'm triying to do the next setup ...
Inet <-> Sid FW (Pc1,eth1-inet,eth0-lan) <-> Sid PPTPd (Pc2,eth0-lan)
On the PC1 I have done this
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p gre -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2
ipta
Hi all, I'm triying to do the next setup ...
Inet <-> Sid FW (Pc1,eth1-inet,eth0-lan) <-> Sid PPTPd (Pc2,eth0-lan)
On the PC1 I have done this
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p gre -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 1723 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2
Along
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Raúl Alexis Betancort Santana wrote:
> Hi all, I'm triying to do the next setup ...
>
> Inet <-> Sid FW (Pc1,eth1-inet,eth0-lan) <-> Sid PPTPd (Pc2,eth0-lan)
>
> On the PC1 I have done this
>
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p gre -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2
> iptables
El Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:19:28AM +0100, Emile van Bergen escribió:
> Have you checked whether GRE traffic in the other direction is allowed
> as well by PC1?
It's not blocked, I have also triyed to MASQ it doing this
iptables -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.2 -p gre -i eth0 -j MASQUERADE
> Also, wh
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:18, Jason Lim wrote:
> > RAID is mandatory for a mail server. Backups are difficult for mail
>
> servers
>
> > as the data is changing all the time, and they'll never be complete.
> >
> > Having a single drive failure lose all your data is unacceptable.
>
> Well, I guess th
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 08:19 PM, Jason Lim wrote:
> Your sources.list must not be correct then, or something is fubared
> somewhere.
>
> Try this...
>
> rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
There is no /var/lib/apt/lists/ directory.
>
> then make SURE /etc/apt/sources.list is correct.
the only
> > Try this...
> >
> > rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
>
> There is no /var/lib/apt/lists/ directory.
Thats weird. That is where the package lists are suppose to be. Hum...
maybe your apt is fubared.
> >
> > then make SURE /etc/apt/sources.list is correct.
>
> the only non-comment lines are:
>
> de
If you just want single Packages from other versions of the distribution,
without upgrading all the rest, you might be interested in
http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2002/1/mail
and adapting that to your needs.
regards
Alex
--
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plan
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Raúl Alexis Betancort Santana wrote:
> El Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:19:28AM +0100, Emile van Bergen escribió:
> > Have you checked whether GRE traffic in the other direction is allowed
> > as well by PC1?
>
> It's not blocked, I have also triyed to MASQ it doing this
I'll bel
> > Well, I guess that depends on how important the mail is, and how often
> > people "download" their mail. Obviously in an IMAP situation where
mail is
> > stored on the server, it must be safe and secure. With clients
(software,
> > i mean) downloading their mail to the desktop, the most they
> > Well, I guess that depends on how important the mail is, and how often
> > people "download" their mail. Obviously in an IMAP situation where
mail is
> > stored on the server, it must be safe and secure. With clients
(software,
> > i mean) downloading their mail to the desktop, the most they
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:46, Jason Lim wrote:
> Mmm... but then, what if you ARE speaking for your company, but don't want
> that person to then send it off to their internal mailing list or
> something like that?
Tough luck.
If a representative of vendor for a project I'm working on sends me an e
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:46, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Mmm... but then, what if you ARE speaking for your company, but don't
want
> > that person to then send it off to their internal mailing list or
> > something like that?
>
> Tough luck.
>
> If a representative of vendor for a project I'm working o
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:37, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Some of my friends even take hidden tape recorders into meetings.
>
> I thought that, legally, one would have to actually warn the person being
> recorded that a recording was taking place. I know that when I phone a
> number of large companies, they
At 11:21 PM 03/18/2002 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:51:55PM -0500, Loren Jordan wrote:
> > If you are able to re compile Qpopper, you can change the location of the
> > .lock file as a compile option, just put it some where there is no
> > quota checking. You will also
hi,
I have a problem I installed 2 new name
servers
ns1.asenacorp.net and ns2 but I can not look for
their
reverse information but my reverse information is
ok I am sure.
What should i do Could somebody help about
me?
Thanks,
erol
Hello,
I have an old Colorado Tap backup – floppy controller –
that I've been trying to get working for sometime now. I have searched on the net for possible
solutions but have been unsuccessful in finding information. I have installed debian’s ftape
software and played with, but alas
Is RAID 0 that risky anymore for data storage (IMAP mail files) ?
I figure that under normal wear and tear a drive should last about 5 years.
Does this sound right ?
I have 3 IBM SCSI 18GB drives.
With RAID 0, I get 51.5GB of storage space.
With RAID 5, I only get 37 GB of space with 20% was
Technically speaking drives don't _wear_ out... Bad sectors are generated
because at some time the disk surface has been damaged, usually by the
heads hitting the disk. And many faults to do with the components on the
controller board can be traced to a poor supply of power (eg spikes and
brow
Thedore Knab wrote:
>
> Is RAID 0 that risky anymore for data storage (IMAP mail files) ?
>
> I figure that under normal wear and tear a drive should last about 5 years.
>
> Does this sound right ?
>
> I have 3 IBM SCSI 18GB drives.
>
> With RAID 0, I get 51.5GB of storage space.
> With RAID
27 matches
Mail list logo
