On Monday 28 May 2001 23:20, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I have postfix running on an end-node. I want to send mail from the
> > machine by running "mail user" and have it go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which
> > is hosted on another machin
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2001, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> > Iif I have a mailuser named "foo" it should be placed in a maildir at
> > /var/spool/mail/f/foo
>
> this is _the_ 'home directory' from courier's point of view.
>
>
Yep, thats how it is supposed
What free XML indexing system can i used? I test swish-e spanish
version, but i need other indexing system. (more powerfull)
--
A. Ramos mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Existen dos productos importantes que salieron de Berkeley:
LSD y UNIX. No creemos que esto sea una coincidencia."
Look at this:
czajnik@earth:~$ ping 156.17.209.1
PING 156.17.209.1 (156.17.209.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=247 time=5427.7 ms
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=429492829.5 ms
Hi Roger,
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:20:41AM +0200, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> Basically it seems to ignore my settings, and use pam instead, which I
> most definitively do not want.
I have courier-imap working here with mysql authentication.
Currently I am using:
courier-authmysql 0.33.0-3
cou
I think that you can get this if you have an MP kernel compiled without
"Enhanced Real Time Clock" support. The default clock driver apparently
isn't MP-safe.
Ken Seefried, CISSP
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn writes:
>
> Look at this:
>
> czajnik@earth:~$ ping 156.17.209.1
> PING 156.17.209.1 (1
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Ken Seefried wrote:
>
> I think that you can get this if you have an MP kernel compiled without
> "Enhanced Real Time Clock" support. The default clock driver apparently
> isn't MP-safe.
Thx, I'll check it tomorrow :).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> I want to accept emails for every domain I am the MX for. Under exim, I
> can set relay_domains_include_local_mx = true and that's it. I don't
> know how to do the same under postfix. Is there a keyword allowing the
> same behavior?
permit_mx_backup
Look at sample-smtpd.
Hmm, I use qmail almost everywhere, but friend asked me for some help with
zmailer. Almost everything is done, but also we need ability to send mails
to all our customers - all accounts in all virt domains. What's the
easiest solution with zmailer ?
-=Czaj-nick=-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:24:39PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
> Look at this:
>
> czajnik@earth:~$ ping 156.17.209.1
> PING 156.17.209.1 (156.17.209.1): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 156.17.209.1
On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
>
> http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
?!? What do U mean ?
isn't the ping time measured by storing system time the ICMP ECHO was
sent, and comparng it to the system time the reply arrived ?
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
> >
> > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
>
> ?!? What do U mean ?
It was a joke ... rfc 1149 is IP over avian
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
> > >
> > > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
> >
> >
I have some problems on one server.
Some times bind doesn't respond any more until it is restarted.
Then I only see domain traffic outgoing, not incoming and no reponses from
others servers.
It is the bind 1:8.2.3-0.potato.1
Is there any fixes/know problems to this version?
--
Carlos Barros.
> It is the bind 1:8.2.3-0.potato.1
> Is there any fixes/know problems to this version?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=bind
>From a security standpoint there are always problems with bind, but no
matter, there are much better DNS servers out there. I believe I saw
maradns enter
On Monday 28 May 2001 23:20, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I have postfix running on an end-node. I want to send mail from the
> > machine by running "mail user" and have it go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which
> > is hosted on another machine
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2001, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> > Iif I have a mailuser named "foo" it should be placed in a maildir at
> > /var/spool/mail/f/foo
>
> this is _the_ 'home directory' from courier's point of view.
>
>
Yep, thats how it is supposed t
What free XML indexing system can i used? I test swish-e spanish
version, but i need other indexing system. (more powerfull)
--
A. Ramos mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Existen dos productos importantes que salieron de Berkeley:
LSD y UNIX. No creemos que esto sea una coincidencia."
Look at this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping 156.17.209.1
PING 156.17.209.1 (156.17.209.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=247 time=5427.7 ms
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=23.2 ms
64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=429492829.5 ms
Hi Roger,
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:20:41AM +0200, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> Basically it seems to ignore my settings, and use pam instead, which I
> most definitively do not want.
I have courier-imap working here with mysql authentication.
Currently I am using:
courier-authmysql 0.33.0-3
cour
I think that you can get this if you have an MP kernel compiled without
"Enhanced Real Time Clock" support. The default clock driver apparently
isn't MP-safe.
Ken Seefried, CISSP
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn writes:
Look at this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping 156.17.209.1
PING 156.17.209.1 (156.17.209
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Ken Seefried wrote:
>
> I think that you can get this if you have an MP kernel compiled without
> "Enhanced Real Time Clock" support. The default clock driver apparently
> isn't MP-safe.
Thx, I'll check it tomorrow :).
Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> I want to accept emails for every domain I am the MX for. Under exim, I
> can set relay_domains_include_local_mx = true and that's it. I don't
> know how to do the same under postfix. Is there a keyword allowing the
> same behavior?
permit_mx_backup
Look at sample-smtpd.c
Hmm, I use qmail almost everywhere, but friend asked me for some help with
zmailer. Almost everything is done, but also we need ability to send mails
to all our customers - all accounts in all virt domains. What's the
easiest solution with zmailer ?
-=Czaj-nick=-
Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:24:39PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
> Look at this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping 156.17.209.1
> PING 156.17.209.1 (156.17.209.1): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 156.17.20
On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
>
> http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
?!? What do U mean ?
isn't the ping time measured by storing system time the ICMP ECHO was
sent, and comparng it to the system time the reply arrived ?
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
> >
> > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
>
> ?!? What do U mean ?
It was a joke ... rfc 1149 is IP over avian c
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
> > >
> > > http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
> >
> >
I have some problems on one server.
Some times bind doesn't respond any more until it is restarted.
Then I only see domain traffic outgoing, not incoming and no reponses from
others servers.
It is the bind 1:8.2.3-0.potato.1
Is there any fixes/know problems to this version?
--
Carlos Barros.
> It is the bind 1:8.2.3-0.potato.1
> Is there any fixes/know problems to this version?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=bind
>From a security standpoint there are always problems with bind, but no
matter, there are much better DNS servers out there. I believe I saw
maradns enter
30 matches
Mail list logo
