On Wed, 30 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Aren't you traveling several rfc1149 links?
>
> http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/pinglogg.txt
?!? What do U mean ?
isn't the ping time measured by storing system time the ICMP ECHO was
sent, and comparng it to the system time the reply arrived ?
I get it even when pinging my Cisco 1601 router, which is connected
directly (I don't care 3com SSII 1100 now)
-=Czaj-nick=-
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:24:39PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> >
> > Look at this:
> >
> > czajnik@earth:~$ ping 156.17.209.1
> > PING 156.17.209.1 (156.17.209.1): 56 data bytes
> > 64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=247 time=5427.7 ms
> > 64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=23.2 ms
> > 64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=429492829.5 ms
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=247 time=429492907.1 ms
> > 64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=247 time=16.5 ms
> > 64 bytes from 156.17.209.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=247 time=21.4 ms
> >
> > What the hell can it be ?!? Every ping comes back in few milisecounds...
> >
> > We've recently added second CPU to this machine, can it (failed CPU) be
> > the reason ? Overall stability is good...
> >
> > -=Czaj-nick=-
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> HoraPe
> ---
> Horacio J. Peńa
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
