Re: Easy trouble ticket system?

2003-02-12 Thread Simon McCartney
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:55:24AM +1300, Sam Sargeant wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:39:36PM +0100, Thomas Lamy wrote: > > can anybody recommend a simple (to set up and maintain) TTS for ISP use? > > We want to > > - auto-assign ticket ids to incoming support requests (by mail or web form) >

Re: Easy trouble ticket system?

2003-02-11 Thread Sami Haahtinen
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:39:36PM +0100, Thomas Lamy wrote: > can anybody recommend a simple (to set up and maintain) TTS for ISP use? > We want to > - auto-assign ticket ids to incoming support requests (by mail or web form) > - assign tickets to individuals or groups > - have a simple ticket rep

Re: Easy trouble ticket system?

2003-02-11 Thread Sam Sargeant
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:39:36PM +0100, Thomas Lamy wrote: > can anybody recommend a simple (to set up and maintain) TTS for ISP use? > We want to > - auto-assign ticket ids to incoming support requests (by mail or web form) > - assign tickets to individuals or groups > - have a simple ticket rep

Easy trouble ticket system?

2003-02-11 Thread Thomas Lamy
Hi, can anybody recommend a simple (to set up and maintain) TTS for ISP use? We want to - auto-assign ticket ids to incoming support requests (by mail or web form) - assign tickets to individuals or groups - have a simple ticket report system (where customers can look up the state of their ticket)

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-10 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:32:41 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 09/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: >> I didn't have time to look into webrt2. However, migration from webrt >> to webrt2 seems to be hard since bug 114116 mentions that there is no >> clean way to upgrade the database. Which

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-10 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:32:41 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 09/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: >> I didn't have time to look into webrt2. However, migration from webrt >> to webrt2 seems to be hard since bug 114116 mentions that there is no >> clean way to upgrade the database. Which

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-09 Thread Christian Kurz
On 09/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:56:37 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: > >> webrt is - for example - completely missing a decently controllable > >> e-mail interface. Basically every interaction needs to be done via the > >

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-09 Thread Christian Kurz
On 09/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:56:37 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: > >> webrt is - for example - completely missing a decently controllable > >> e-mail interface. Basically every interaction needs to be done via the >

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-09 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:56:37 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: >> webrt is - for example - completely missing a decently controllable >> e-mail interface. Basically every interaction needs to be done via the > >Even in the new version webrt2, which is c

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-09 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:56:37 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: >> webrt is - for example - completely missing a decently controllable >> e-mail interface. Basically every interaction needs to be done via the > >Even in the new version webrt2, which is

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-06 Thread Nick Jennings
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:40:08PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the > one in the stable release). > Thanks, > Matt PerlDesk, http://perldesk.org looks pret

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-06 Thread Nick Jennings
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:40:08PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the > one in the stable release). > Thanks, > Matt PerlDesk, http://perldesk.org looks

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-06 Thread Christian Kurz
On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:27:32 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote: > >> Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > >> I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good peopl

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:27:32 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote: >> Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? >> I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the > >What do you mean ex

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-06 Thread Christian Kurz
On 06/12/01, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:27:32 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote: > >> Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > >> I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good peopl

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:27:32 +0100, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote: >> Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? >> I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the > >What do you mean ex

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread Sergio Patino
We're about to deploy dcl - http://dcl.sourceforge.net Really nice package in constant development and the developer is great about adding requested functionality.

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread Sergio Patino
We're about to deploy dcl - http://dcl.sourceforge.net Really nice package in constant development and the developer is great about adding requested functionality. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread Fraser Campbell
Matt Fair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? We use a home rolled ticket system (http://www.starnix.com/banal/dl/dev/), tickets automatically created when clients email us, tickets semi-automatically assigned to projects, tickets can

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread Keith Elder
. Thanks, Keith * Alejandro Borges ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Subject: Re: trouble ticket system > From: Alejandro Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: z-deb-isp > X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.2 (Preview Release) > Date: 04 Dec 2001 01:16:19 -0600 > > El lun, 03-12-2001 a l

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread Fraser Campbell
Matt Fair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? We use a home rolled ticket system (http://www.starnix.com/banal/dl/dev/), tickets automatically created when clients email us, tickets semi-automatically assigned to projects, tickets can

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread Keith Elder
. Thanks, Keith * Alejandro Borges ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Subject: Re: trouble ticket system > From: Alejandro Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: z-deb-isp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.2 (Preview Release) > Date: 04 Dec 2001 01:16:19 -0600 > >

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread Christian Kurz
On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the What do you mean exactly with "doesn't look"? Which featuers are you missing? Which features does a trouble tic

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread Christian Kurz
On 03/12/01, Matt Fair wrote: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the What do you mean exactly with "doesn't look"? Which featuers are you missing? Which features does a trouble

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread mose
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:40:08PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the > one in the stable release). - RT is good, at least it is clearly written and easily fit t

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-04 Thread Alejandro Borges
El lun, 03-12-2001 a las 23:40, Matt Fair escribió: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the > one in the stable release). > Thanks, > Matt I like phpgroupware'sbut th

trouble ticket system

2001-12-03 Thread Matt Fair
Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the one in the stable release). Thanks, Matt

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-03 Thread mose
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:40:08PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the > one in the stable release). - RT is good, at least it is clearly written and easily fit t

Re: trouble ticket system

2001-12-03 Thread Alejandro Borges
El lun, 03-12-2001 a las 23:40, Matt Fair escribió: > Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? > I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the > one in the stable release). > Thanks, > Matt I like phpgroupware'sbut th

trouble ticket system

2001-12-03 Thread Matt Fair
Would would be the best trouble ticket system to use? I took a rt, but it doesn't look as good people say it is (at least the one in the stable release). Thanks, Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]