Hi People,
I have an ISDN server, it works with portslave to accept incoming calls
with PPP protocol, it works fine, but recently I need to implement under
the same server a service to accept SLIP connections too... I rebuild
the kernel to accept SLIP protocol, it seems to be work, but I have
Title: RE: Problem with Portslave
Hi Russel,
yes, as you can imagine, I have a Cyclades TS1000 and it works very fine, but I love linux too
do you have a beta or some patch that enables that feature??
Javier.
-Mensaje original-
De: Russell
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:29, Javier Castillo Alcibar wrote:
> I am new with portslave, and I cannot resolv a problem :((
>
> I have a Cyclades PC400 pri isdn card. I want to telnet from my
> windows machine to my linux+portslave box, and get the prompt of my pc400
> like
Title: Problem with Portslave
Hi there,
I am new with portslave, and I cannot resolv a problem :((
I have a Cyclades PC400 pri isdn card. I want to telnet from my windows machine to my linux+portslave box, and get the prompt of my pc400 like if I use "cu -l
Title: RE: Problem with Portslave
Hi Russel,
yes, as you can imagine, I have a Cyclades TS1000 and it works very fine, but I love linux too
do you have a beta or some patch that enables that feature??
Javier.
-Mensaje original-
De: Russell
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:29, Javier Castillo Alcibar wrote:
> I am new with portslave, and I cannot resolv a problem :((
>
> I have a Cyclades PC400 pri isdn card. I want to telnet from my
> windows machine to my linux+portslave box, and get the prompt of my pc400
> like
Title: Problem with Portslave
Hi there,
I am new with portslave, and I cannot resolv a problem :((
I have a Cyclades PC400 pri isdn card. I want to telnet from my windows machine to my linux+portslave box, and get the prompt of my pc400 like if I use "cu -l
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:05, I. Forbes wrote:
> Hello Russell
>
> On 9 Oct 2001, at 21:13, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> > http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to
> >
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:05, I. Forbes wrote:
> Hello Russell
>
> On 9 Oct 2001, at 21:13, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> > http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to
> >
Quoting "I. Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hylafax has a "faxgetty" program that answers the modem. It allows
> dial-out like mgetty
On a slight tangent, I like both Hylafax and features of mgetty. Can
both play together on the same port instead of using faxgetty?
bob
--
bob billson
Quoting "I. Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hylafax has a "faxgetty" program that answers the modem. It allows
> dial-out like mgetty
On a slight tangent, I like both Hylafax and features of mgetty. Can
both play together on the same port instead of using faxgetty?
bob
--
bob billson
Hello Russell
On 15 Oct 2001, at 17:58, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:18, I. Forbes wrote:
> > Perhaps the same or a similar configuration file could tell portslave
> > how to handle incoming calls detected by the modem as being
> > voice or fax as
Hello Russell
On 15 Oct 2001, at 17:58, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:18, I. Forbes wrote:
> > Perhaps the same or a similar configuration file could tell portslave
> > how to handle incoming calls detected by the modem as being
> > voice or fax as
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:18, I. Forbes wrote:
> > I have been thinking of implementing a way of telling Portslave to pass
> > the port to another program to allow minicom or a FAX transmission to
> > take the port.
>
> I think the answer lies in by-passing radius. I
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:18, I. Forbes wrote:
> > I have been thinking of implementing a way of telling Portslave to pass
> > the port to another program to allow minicom or a FAX transmission to
> > take the port.
>
> I think the answer lies in by-passing radius. I
Hello Russell
On 13 Oct 2001, at 19:14, Russell Coker wrote:
> I have been thinking of implementing a way of telling Portslave to pass the
> port to another program to allow minicom or a FAX transmission to take the
> port.
I think the answer lies in by-passing radius. If we had a
Hello Russell
On 13 Oct 2001, at 19:14, Russell Coker wrote:
> I have been thinking of implementing a way of telling Portslave to pass the
> port to another program to allow minicom or a FAX transmission to take the
> port.
I think the answer lies in by-passing radius. If we had a
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:32, I. Forbes wrote:
> > Hopefully I'll have one for you tomorrow. I'll try and back-port the
> > main ppp package at the same time. Then you'll get the latest pppd along
> > with the Portslave that uses the regular pppd (saves memory).
&g
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 01:14, Rodrigo Cesar Herefeld wrote:
> 1 - Where can i find documentation about configuring portslave? I`m
> some lost about it and can`t imagine how to do that( i`ve tried to work on
> the samples that came along with the program but didn`t get that to really
>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 17:14, Cathedral wrote:
> Where can i find documentation to configure portslave, i have installed a
> portslave from unstable and i`m not getting a way to configure that.
Run "dpkg -L portslave | grep etc" and you'll see a list of config files,
you&#x
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:05, I. Forbes wrote:
> > I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> > http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to
> > test it though... Also it is a new version...
>
> I think I have
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 09:32, I. Forbes wrote:
> > Hopefully I'll have one for you tomorrow. I'll try and back-port the
> > main ppp package at the same time. Then you'll get the latest pppd along
> > with the Portslave that uses the regular pppd (saves memory).
&g
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 01:14, Rodrigo Cesar Herefeld wrote:
> 1 - Where can i find documentation about configuring portslave? I`m
> some lost about it and can`t imagine how to do that( i`ve tried to work on
> the samples that came along with the program but didn`t get that to really
>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 17:14, Cathedral wrote:
> Where can i find documentation to configure portslave, i have installed a
> portslave from unstable and i`m not getting a way to configure that.
Run "dpkg -L portslave | grep etc" and you'll see a list of config files,
you&#x
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:05, I. Forbes wrote:
> > I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> > http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to
> > test it though... Also it is a new version...
>
> I think I have
Hello Russell
On 9 Oct 2001, at 21:13, Russell Coker wrote:
> I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
> though... Also it is a new version...
I think I have found a
Hello Russell
On 9 Oct 2001, at 21:13, Russell Coker wrote:
> I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
> though... Also it is a new version...
I think I have found a
Where can i find documentation to configure portslave, i have installed a
portslave from unstable and i`m not getting a way to configure that.
Thanks.
Where can i find documentation to configure portslave, i have installed a
portslave from unstable and i`m not getting a way to configure that.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Russell Coker wrote:
> I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
> though... Also it is a new version...
>
> --
> http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard
, Russell Coker wrote:
> I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
> though... Also it is a new version...
>
> --
> http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard
> I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
> though... Also it is a new version...
Oh cool! I will test it for you! :)
Thanks heaps Russell,
- Jeff
--
&q
> I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
> http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
> though... Also it is a new version...
Oh cool! I will test it for you! :)
Thanks heaps Russell,
- Jeff
--
&q
First off all thanks about the answer, i didn`t know about portslave,
actuacly now that i have the program instaled(via apt) , well now i have
two problems :
1 - Where can i find documentation about configuring portslave? I`m
some lost about it and can`t imagine how to do that( i`ve tried
First off all thanks about the answer, i didn`t know about portslave,
actuacly now that i have the program instaled(via apt) , well now i have
two problems :
1 - Where can i find documentation about configuring portslave? I`m
some lost about it and can`t imagine how to do that( i`ve
I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
though... Also it is a new version...
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/p
I have put a copy of the latest portslave compiled for potato online at
http://www.coker.com.au/portslave/ . I don't have a potato system to test it
though... Also it is a new version...
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/p
I
> > have done that it wont look like a "potato" system any more.
>
> Hopefully I'll have one for you tomorrow. I'll try and back-port the main
> ppp package at the same time. Then you'll get the latest pppd along with the
> Portslave that uses the regul
I
> > have done that it wont look like a "potato" system any more.
>
> Hopefully I'll have one for you tomorrow. I'll try and back-port the main
> ppp package at the same time. Then you'll get the latest pppd along with the
> Portslave that uses the
> > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> > >
> > > I like tanks! ;)
> >
> > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
>
> Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly,
> fast, etc.
I meant the tank. ;)
Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some
> > way.
>
> Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no,
> that's for like, *lots* of modems." :)
Well the latest version of Portslave (the one that is too
> > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
>
> I like tanks! ;)
Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
> Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some way.
Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no, that's
for like, *lots* of modems." :)
> I r
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:27, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> > line!
>
> Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
I like tanks! ;)
> > If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS
* This one time, at band camp, Jeff Waugh said:
> > Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficult part of a
> > Portslave installation.
>
> Can I authenticate with PAM, etc. somehow?
>
Well, RADIUS isn't that hard. A simple radius server can auth
> There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> line!
Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's big
> enough for Portslave.
>
> Setting up the RADIUS ser
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:36, I. Forbes wrote:
> The old one ran mgetty and a pppd patched for radius
> authentication via the radius client library. The patches have not
> been updated since pppd version 2.2 and the old machine still has
> a 2.0 series kernel.
>
> I am using po
> > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> > >
> > > I like tanks! ;)
> >
> > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
>
> Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly,
> fast, etc.
I meant the tank. ;)
Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some
> > way.
>
> Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no,
> that's for like, *lots* of modems." :)
Well the latest version of Portslave (the one that is too
> > Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
>
> I like tanks! ;)
Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;)
> Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some way.
Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no, that's
for like, *lots* of modems." :)
> I
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:27, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> > line!
>
> Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
I like tanks! ;)
> > If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS
* This one time, at band camp, Jeff Waugh said:
> > Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficult part of a
> > Portslave installation.
>
> Can I authenticate with PAM, etc. somehow?
>
Well, RADIUS isn't that hard. A simple radius server can auth
> There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in
> line!
Is that like sending in the tanks? :)
> If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's big
> enough for Portslave.
>
> Setting up the RADIUS ser
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:36, I. Forbes wrote:
> The old one ran mgetty and a pppd patched for radius
> authentication via the radius client library. The patches have not
> been updated since pppd version 2.2 and the old machine still has
> a 2.0 series kernel.
>
> I am using po
Hello Russell
I am busy testing a portslave server to replace my old ancient
Cyclades-Y based terminal server.
The old one ran mgetty and a pppd patched for radius
authentication via the radius client library. The patches have not
been updated since pppd version 2.2 and the old machine
Hello Russell
I am busy testing a portslave server to replace my old ancient
Cyclades-Y based terminal server.
The old one ran mgetty and a pppd patched for radius
authentication via the radius client library. The patches have not
been updated since pppd version 2.2 and the old machine
On Sat, 6 Oct 2001 11:53, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > Anything that can be done by getty, mgetty, radius-client, etc can be
> > done better by Portslave.
>
> Is portslave appropriate for a smaller system, say with only three dial-in
> ports? mgetty is not exactly the most polite s
> Anything that can be done by getty, mgetty, radius-client, etc can be done
> better by Portslave.
Is portslave appropriate for a smaller system, say with only three dial-in
ports? mgetty is not exactly the most polite software to administer, and
there are lots of times I'd li
t will only work for terminal authentication (the default for Windows is
AutoPPP). Also are you sure that your "-I" parameter is correct? The
documentation for the version of getty that I use doesn't indicate support
for chat scripts.
Why not use Portslave? It answers the
58 matches
Mail list logo
