This one time, at band camp, Wouter Verhelst said:
> Op di, 16-11-2004 te 19:28 +0100, schreef David Schmitt:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:15:24AM -0700, Omar wrote:
> > > Also I want to ask if there is a way that I can check the user
> > > Authentication?
> > > Or get a list of users and their
Op di, 16-11-2004 te 19:28 +0100, schreef David Schmitt:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:15:24AM -0700, Omar wrote:
> > Also I want to ask if there is a way that I can check the user
> > Authentication?
> > Or get a list of users and their level? admin, regular user and so on. I
> > believe
> > th
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacob S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Debian for ISP
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:15:24 -0700
> Omar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello all
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:15:24AM -0700, Omar wrote:
> Also I want to ask if there is a way that I can check the user
> Authentication?
> Or get a list of users and their level? admin, regular user and so on. I
> believe
> that the previous admin used LDAP, is there a way I can look into the L
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:15:24 -0700
Omar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have just took over a network for an ISP that is running Debian, I
> am used to
> using Cpanel/Whm and now I have to use the CLI.
>
> The ISP also provides Hosting services and it us
Omar wrote:
Also I am thinking of installing webmin, so I can configure everything over the
web, if I do install it, will it recognize the current system, and the current
settings or will I have to take things in manually.
Not sure about the other questions, but Webmin will recognise your
curr
Hello all,
I have just took over a network for an ISP that is running Debian, I am used
to
using Cpanel/Whm and now I have to use the CLI.
The ISP also provides Hosting services and it uses dbdns 1.03, tinydns, xfrdns,
I
am having problems with tinydns, as I use the add-ns and it worked for 4
Hi there, At the moment we are running apache 1.3.x on a debian woody
box with PHP/MySQL enabled for selected sites and also a shared verisign
cert (also for selected sites).
At the moment we store the config in MySQL and then have a script that
writes lots of config files to a conf/ dir (one f
rom the start, all necessary tools and programs, in a
Software RAID, backup, and networking are needed on workstations just as badly
as on ISP servers. You don't need an ISP specific distribution to need that.
> compact, easy to use distribution with some "ncursed" ISP spe
Please write your text after the quoted text and don't quote excessively.
This is not AOL.
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:48, "shift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, about the week-end, you're welcome for another one (...)
>
> About the install, I do almost the same. the second part is the
> optimiza
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:51:54AM +0200, shift wrote:
> [lots of stuff]
top-posting is evil. please don't top-post.
> [ 109 lines of excess quoted text deleted ]
2. learn to trim your quotes.
craig
PS: (standard quote information file)
please learn to quote properly. your reply goes UNDERN
doesn't need
to be changed.
Realising a "beautiful" distribution is part of personal developpement,
imposing it is...is...well, can't find the right word.
So, then, what is the problem?
"Defining ISP" in Debian is more thinking the ISP situation widely and
ahead, trying to create
mail, djbdns, qmail-scr, qmail-scanner, spamassassin,
>>ClamAV)
>> [...]
>>DNS-primary (djbdns, VegaDNS, mysql)
>>DNS-secondary (djbdns)
>
> both qmail and djbdns are non-free and could never be part of a debian-isp
> meta package.
>
> on a more general no
Comments inline, I've cut out a bunch of replies to make it easier to
read.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 17 September 2004 10:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Defining ISP
[...]
>DNS-primary (djbdns, VegaDNS, mysql)
>DNS-secondary (djbdns)
both qmail and djbdns are non-free and could never be part of a debian-isp
meta package.
on a more general note, this highlights exactly why such a meta-package
wouldn't be very useful anyway. there are many
Comments in line
Darrel O'Pry wrote:
Well I guess I'll try to start a discussion about what would be needed
for an ISP distribution, and present a basic primer to how I run my
systems as an example of needs or things to keep in mind developing an
ISP distribution that can meet a wide
- Original Message -
From: "Darrel O'Pry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 5:35 PM
Subject: RE: Defining ISP?
> Well I guess I'll try to start a discussion about what would be needed
> for an ISP distr
Well I guess I'll try to start a discussion about what would be needed
for an ISP distribution, and present a basic primer to how I run my
systems as an example of needs or things to keep in mind developing an
ISP distribution that can meet a wide variety of needs.
I think it might be easi
://people.debian.org/~kalfa/cdd/debian-devel
BR,
jonathan
shift wrote:
hej J.
Me I'd like to be in it.
shift
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Defining ISP?
I would be
hej J.
Me I'd like to be in it.
shift
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Defining ISP?
> I would be so please with the help of the phorun to pr
I would be so please with the help of the phorun to propose open a new
branch into the Debian community dedicated to ISP.
Whom of you're interested??
BR,
jonathan
shift wrote:
The idea seems still interesting to me 2 days after the week-end! ( Did
some definitive dammage happen? :)
I im
"ncursed" ISP specific
administration tools. Something secure, minimalistic (I like the word and
the concept) and with some optimization possibilities.
does-it still seem confuse? Is it "une idee farfelue"?
shift
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan G - Mailing List
> -Original Message-
> From: shift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2004 4:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Defining ISP?
>
>
> Hej till alla
>
> Is it possible to define with some accuracy the needs of ISPs?
> Som
Oh no, was a typo, is dist-upgrade :) thanks for the note
BR,
jonthan
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:14:02 +0200, Jonathan wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
4. apt-get distro-upgrade
..you meant dist-upgrade, or is distro-upgrade different from
apt-get dist-upgrade???
--
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:14:02 +0200, Jonathan wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 4. apt-get distro-upgrade
..you meant dist-upgrade, or is distro-upgrade different from
apt-get dist-upgrade???
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunt
Hello
On 2004-09-14 shift wrote:
> Using an optimized distrib on an SR2200 (dual PIII 1.4GHz Tualatin-S),
> SCSI U160, I have better results on Mysql nemchmarks than with a
> non-optimized SR2300-SKU0 dual xeon 3.0 1MB L3 cache and SCSI U320!!
Sounds very unrealistic. Are you sure that it wasn't
R2300-SKU0 dual xeon 3.0 1MB L3 cache and SCSI U320!!
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: Defining ISP?
> yep shift, is what i've done. I've been
About this. (comments in line)
shift wrote:
At my actual knowledge, such a distribution doesn't exist. Should it be
interesting or is it only the remanent effects of a very good long week-end?
i'm quite interested. :)
jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
and regroup the whole in a
minimalistic optimized distribution specificly made for ISP use? And
excluding all other packages (desktop, non-necessary libraries, windowing
etc...).
It's even possible to integrate some optimization tools (apt-build) and
automatize some installation jobs
At my
Well, it seems to be the best method. But isn't it possible to define a
general list of necessary packages used by ISPs and regroup the whole in a
minimalistic optimized distribution specificly made for ISP use? And
excluding all other packages (desktop, non-necessary libraries, windowin
han
Christian Hammers wrote:
On 2004-09-14 shift wrote:
Thinking maybe of a an ISP specific install. Lighter and even more
secure. A minimalistic distribution...
Most ISP will probably have different servers for the different services and on each
of them they will start with a secure base inst
On 2004-09-14 shift wrote:
> Thinking maybe of a an ISP specific install. Lighter and even more
> secure. A minimalistic distribution...
Most ISP will probably have different servers for the different services and on each
of them they will start with a secure base install with as few so
That's what I am actually doing :)
Base system then dpkg...
But what I'd like to do is something different.
Thinking maybe of a an ISP specific install. Lighter and even more secure. A
minimalistic distribution...
I don't know if there are other persons interested...
mvh
shift
> Is it possible to define with some accuracy the needs of ISPs? Some
> list of all the components in a Debian that are absolutely necessary
> for the ISP work. Is it possible to compose a custom ISP Debian? or
I.e compose your own debian-distribution?
I'd install base-system
Hej till alla
Is it possible to define with some accuracy the needs of ISPs?
Some list of all the components in a Debian that are absolutely necessary
for the ISP work. Is it possible to compose a custom ISP Debian? or custom
ISP debians (different flavours: mail specific, routage-specific
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 10:12, Paul Johnson wrote:
[...]
> > - What should I manage using packages and what should I manage
> > using source code?
>
> If it has a package, use the packages unless you absolutely must
> compile something from source that conflicts with how Debian compiled
>
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francisco Javier Fabra Caro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've installed recently Debian Sarge in a machine for ISP purposes.
> Now, my question is:
> - What should I manage using package
Hi all,
I've installed recently Debian Sarge in a machine for ISP purposes.
Now, my question is:
- What should I manage using packages and what should I manage
using source code?
Concretely, I have installed the mail service using packages, but now
I have to install the FTP se
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 55228 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 18:07:04 -
Received: from unknown (HELO ch2.net) (209.112.87.78)
by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 18:07:04 -
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:09:08 -0600
To: "Php-genera
New technology site!
URL is here:
http://www.iyimi.com
This site including technological product reviews, useful documents and more...
Please visit and support to us!
---
http://www.iyimi.com
iyimi.com :: Technological product reviews ©2004
--
Hola!
(2) http://jodies.de/ipcalc
My answer to (2) in intl. language :-)
apt-get install sipcalc
I know that is a international list but i'm a brazilian and a mail from .com.br
...
Tipow vc precisa ler um pouco + sobre quebras de rede e roteamento
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:00:24 -0300
Djalma Fadel Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello everybody,
>
> FIRSTLY:
>
> I'm not sure
Hola!
(2) http://jodies.de/ipcalc
My answer to (2) in intl. language :-)
apt-get install sipcalc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know that is a international list but i'm a brazilian and a mail from .com.br ...
Tipow vc precisa ler um pouco + sobre quebras de rede e roteamento
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:00:24 -0300
Djalma Fadel Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello everybody,
>
> FIRSTLY:
>
> I'm not sure i
--On Tuesday, June 22, 2004 21:16 -0500 Pete Templin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You've got mismatched subnets. It might work with some hacking, but
you're better off designing it correctly.
Does the Linux box route? If not, you'll need to have a common subnet at
least from the Cisco router to
You've got mismatched subnets. It might work with some hacking, but
you're better off designing it correctly.
Does the Linux box route? If not, you'll need to have a common subnet
at least from the Cisco router to Radio1, and you should insert a hub or
switch to tie together the data path fro
--On Tuesday, June 22, 2004 21:16 -0500 Pete Templin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You've got mismatched subnets. It might work with some hacking, but
you're better off designing it correctly.
Does the Linux box route? If not, you'll need to have a common subnet at
least from the Cisco router to
You've got mismatched subnets. It might work with some hacking, but
you're better off designing it correctly.
Does the Linux box route? If not, you'll need to have a common subnet
at least from the Cisco router to Radio1, and you should insert a hub or
switch to tie together the data path fro
hello everybody,
FIRSTLY:
I'm not sure if this is the right list for my problem, so any suggestion of
Discussion List would be welcome.
THE STRUCTURE:
^^
SERVER SIDE CLIENT SIDE
^^^ ^^^
+---
hello everybody,
FIRSTLY:
I'm not sure if this is the right list for my problem, so any suggestion of Discussion
List would be welcome.
THE STRUCTURE:
^^
SERVER SIDE CLIENT SIDE
^^^ ^^^
+---
Debian-isp keypunch vicinal elsewhere puma bend methodism tannin hereto kumquat lumen surtout dunn countermen
Image is Loading . . . .
Image not Showing? Debian-isp, Place Your O.r.d.e.r T.o.d.a.y
osborne rig jose electric lumbar abuilding lessee ternary avert clung jericho rangeland
Debian-isp keypunch vicinal elsewhere puma bend methodism tannin hereto kumquat lumen surtout dunn countermen
Image is Loading . . . .
Image not Showing? Debian-isp, Place Your O.r.d.e.r T.o.d.a.y
osborne rig jose electric lumbar abuilding lessee ternary avert clung jericho rangeland
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:45:38 +1300, Pulu wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used
> this in the way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint
> Netfilter patch to block Windows machines sending to p
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:45:38 +1300, Pulu wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used
> this in the way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint
> Netfilter patch to block Windows machines sending to p
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "Pulu 'Anau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: OSF for an ISP (was Re: ..idea; ddos spam hosts off Internet?)
> For NT (XP etc) you co
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:45, Pulu 'Anau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used this in
> the way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint Netfilter
> patch to block Windows machines sending to port 25).
&g
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Pulu 'Anau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: OSF for an ISP (was Re: ..idea; ddos spam hosts off Internet?)
>
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:45, Pulu 'Anau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used this in
> the way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint Netfilter
> patch to block Windows machines sending to port 25).
&g
Hi,
you shouldn't try to block everything that comes from a host which has no open
smtp port, this is in generel a bad idea...
reason: there are a lot (and I mean a lot) of servers out there, which only
sends mail out to the world, but should never recieve any mail directly, so
that it is okay
Hi,
you shouldn't try to block everything that comes from a host which has no open
smtp port, this is in generel a bad idea...
reason: there are a lot (and I mean a lot) of servers out there, which only
sends mail out to the world, but should never recieve any mail directly, so
that it is okay
Hi!
Dave Watkins wrote:
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Dav
wrote:
To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used this in the
way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint Netfilter patch to
block Windows machines sending to port 25).
We're currently getting slammed by Windows viruses and have thought about doing
ex
To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used this in the
way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint Netfilter patch to
block Windows machines sending to port 25).
We're currently getting slammed by Windows viruses and have thought about doing
exactly
Hi!
Dave Watkins wrote:
If I remember right (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) a mail server
doesn't have to have an MX record. If no MX record exists then the
sending server drops back to normal host records and this is perfectly
legitimate. So the MX record checking may not work so well
Da
Anau wrote:
To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used this in the
way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint Netfilter patch to
block Windows machines sending to port 25).
We're currently getting slammed by Windows viruses and have thought about doing
ex
To kind of get back to the ISP world a little bit, has anyone used this in the
way that's being recommended? (Using the OS Fingerprint Netfilter patch to
block Windows machines sending to port 25).
We're currently getting slammed by Windows viruses and have thought about doing
exactly
-
This message was sent using Conway Corporation WebMail -- www.conwaycorp.net
-
This message was sent using Conway Corporation WebMail -- www.conwaycorp.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a system generated message, please DO NOT respond to this email.
Your recent email message with the subject of " Re: Word file " has NOT
been delivered to its intended recipient ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) due
to, possibly, carrying a virus.
The infected component in the scanned document was de
This is a system generated message, please DO NOT respond to this email.
Your recent email message with the subject of " Re: Word file " has NOT
been delivered to its intended recipient ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) due
to, possibly, carrying a virus.
The infected component in the scanned document was de
If finger is not working, does chfn or the password change stuff work ?
I think this is a PAM issue. However, I could be wrong.
My '/etc/pam.d/login' file looks like this and fingers work with LDAP.
What does your look like ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/pam.d$ cat login | grep -v ^#
auth requ
If finger is not working, does chfn or the password change stuff work ?
I think this is a PAM issue. However, I could be wrong.
My '/etc/pam.d/login' file looks like this and fingers work with LDAP.
What does your look like ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/pam.d$ cat login | grep -v ^#
auth requ
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:27:56PM -0600, Chris Hoover wrote:
> However, what do most of you use for:
>
> 1. Webmail
Squirrelmail
> 2. Imap/pop access
Dovecot. Courier-IMAP is also a popular choice.
Also recommended: your choice of amavis implementations and clamav.
> 3. User management
MyS
Emmanuel Halbwachs wrote:
Adam ENDRODI a écrit :
-apache
What information could Apache read from LDAP?
Authentication ?
exactly, that is why i am using mod_ldap
(libapache-mod-ldap).
so ldap-support is kind of built-in.
mfg.a.fr
IOhannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Adam ENDRODI a écrit :
-apache
What information could Apache read from LDAP?
Authentication ?
Cheers,
--
Emmanuel HalbwachsLaboratoire de Photonique et Nanostructures
tel : (+33)1 69 63 61 34 CNRS UPR 20
fax : (+33)1 69 63 60 06
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:57:40PM +0100, David Zejda wrote:
> > > 3. User management
> >
> > LDAP (with a lot of "glue" we've coded up in php and python)
>
> is there any project, that provides The Glue?
There are a number of projects that try to help maintaining
the directory and to migrate fr
> > 3. User management
>
> LDAP (with a lot of "glue" we've coded up in php and python)
is there any project, that provides The Glue?
ldap/sqldb->config files for
-postfix
-courier
-nsd
-apache
-ssh
-...
(modular design preffered)
thanks
Dvid
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
21. February 2004:
> Me and some friends are looking into starting a local isp. My friends are
> networking experts with some linux experience and I am the linux expert with
> some networking experience.
>
> Anyway, my question is what software do most of you use? Obviously, we ha
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:38:47PM -0600, Jose Alberto wrote:
>
> Plus, it may be good to have reiserfs and some sort of volume
> management layer (ie. LVM) preferably on hardware raid, to quickly
Strange as it sounds, but I've noticed that LVM (kernel 2.4.22)
also increased performance wrt re
Nicolas Rueff wrote:
Ainsi parla Chris Hoover le 52ème jour de l'an 2004:
Me and some friends are looking into starting a local isp. My friends
are networking experts with some linux experience and I am the linux
expert with some networking experience.
Anyway, my question is what softwa
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:35, Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had a lot of headaches with Imp. Imp relies on Horde being
> correctly setup. It seems that, every time I do an update of my packages
> to the latest .deb's, Imp and Horde break. I have to completely purge
> it, and re-instal
Nicolas Rueff wrote:
Anyway, my question is what software do most of you use? Obviously,
we have decided to use Debian for our base os. However, what do most
of you use for:
1. Webmail
Imp. Works well. Really.
I've had a lot of headaches with Imp. Imp relies on Horde being
correctly set
n the amount of time taken to manage IMP
will probably be excessive.
IMP has lots of good features and is very extensible. One ISP I worked for
had hundreds of thousands of users on IMP, they implemented extra features in
PHP, fixed translations, and did lots of other things. The results were
>-Original Message-
>From: Theodore Knab [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 01:07 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Starting isp and going to use Debian
>
>
>On 22/02/04 01:38 +0100, Nicolas Rueff wrote:
>> Ainsi parla Chris Hoo
are looking into starting a local isp. My friends
> > are networking experts with some linux experience and I am the linux
> > expert with some networking experience.
> >
> > Anyway, my question is what software do most of you use? Obviously,
> > we have decided t
Ainsi parla Chris Hoover le 52ème jour de l'an 2004:
> Me and some friends are looking into starting a local isp. My friends
> are networking experts with some linux experience and I am the linux
> expert with some networking experience.
>
> Anyway, my question is what sof
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 14:50, charlie derr wrote:
> > 5. Drive usage control (i.e. user only get 10M for mail and 15M for web)
>
> We have quotas implemented on the web and mail servers. This is a daily
>task though (raising quotas of people who've exceeded their default)
You could automate
Chris Hoover wrote:
>
> Anyway, my question is what software do most of you use? Obviously, we have
> decided to use Debian for our base os. However, what do most of you use
> for:
>
> 1. Webmail
I use IMP (part of Horde, http://www.horde.org/). It's not the best,
but it turned out to be the
Hello,
I work for a school (which is not technically an isp, but since we have
4 T1s and several hundred users, many things will overlap).
Chris Hoover wrote:
Me and some friends are looking into starting a local isp. My friends are
networking experts with some linux experience and I am the
Me and some friends are looking into starting a local isp. My friends are
networking experts with some linux experience and I am the linux expert with
some networking experience.
Anyway, my question is what software do most of you use? Obviously, we have
decided to use Debian for our base os
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:55:37PM +0530, prasad wrote:
> As many of you must have experienced, there are usual SOPs for setting up
> non-bloated, secure bare-bones Servers with respective OSs eg for solaris.
>
> Is there SOP for debian, if not, I guess this list is better poised to
> produce one.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:55:37PM +0530, prasad wrote:
> As many of you must have experienced, there are usual SOPs for setting up
> non-bloated, secure bare-bones Servers with respective OSs eg for solaris.
>
> Is there SOP for debian, if not, I guess this list is better poised to
> produce one.
Greetings!
> I use MS-ISA Server, but I don't know what is the NTLM
> authentication scheme...
Microsoft insisted on inventin their own HTTP protocol, including an
authentication method where the client (browser) authenticates with
WinNT-Domain credentials against the web server (IIS/ISA) withou
Greetings!
> I use MS-ISA Server, but I don't know what is the NTLM
> authentication scheme...
Microsoft insisted on inventin their own HTTP protocol, including an
authentication method where the client (browser) authenticates with
WinNT-Domain credentials against the web server (IIS/ISA) withou
r poised to
> produce one. Any links, pointers... I have googled, but didn't find any
> old message,
>
> What applies for isp-servers also applies for corporate servers which
> are 24/7 connected to net for things like mail etc, which need to take
> similar precautions. One o
Greetings!
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:55:37 +0530 prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As many of you must have experienced, there are usual SOPs for setting
> up non-bloated, secure bare-bones Servers with respective OSs eg for
> solaris.
> Is there SOP for debian, if not, I guess this list is better
r poised to
> produce one. Any links, pointers... I have googled, but didn't find any
> old
> message,
>
> What applies for isp-servers also applies for corporate servers which
> are
> 24/7 connected to net for things like mail etc, which need to take
> similar
&g
r poised to
> produce one. Any links, pointers... I have googled, but didn't find any
> old message,
>
> What applies for isp-servers also applies for corporate servers which
> are 24/7 connected to net for things like mail etc, which need to take
> similar precautions. One o
d any old
message,
What applies for isp-servers also applies for corporate servers which are
24/7 connected to net for things like mail etc, which need to take similar
precautions. One of the reasons I have found, one company took a policy
decision to not deploy to linux servers some time back, is b
Greetings!
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 21:55:37 +0530 prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As many of you must have experienced, there are usual SOPs for setting
> up non-bloated, secure bare-bones Servers with respective OSs eg for
> solaris.
> Is there SOP for debian, if not, I guess this list is better
1 - 100 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
