On Thu, 18 May 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>> Assuming you are worried by people with promiscuous ethernet cards,
>> packet-sniffing. Put in a second NIC, run a crossover UTP? I assume the
>.. encrypting would solve that problem. or private network between two
>ccomps.
>And - if I could connec
At 12:48 PM 5/18/00 +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>That was the original scheme, but bosses hmmm, after some consultations
>said that we should transfer data on cd-roms with armed guardian.
>so now we've got problems, and deadlines haven't changed
>although we had no idea of those security issues
At 04:36 PM 5/18/00 +0500, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> I think you can install NIC into machine with data (call it machine A), place
>another machine with large hdd with NIC in it near the source machine A (call
>it machine B), connect them using crosswired UTP, download data to machine B,
A laptop woul
You could add a seperate network link between the two endpoints...
With that kind of data requirements Gig Ethernet might be a good choice.
You could also use SSL for the network transport in order to encrypt the
data to make it more secure.
DVD-RAM is nicer than ZIP as far as storage space goes
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
> > Assuming you are worried by people with promiscuous ethernet cards,
> > packet-sniffing. Put in a second NIC, run a crossover UTP? I assume the
> .. encrypting would solve that problem. or private network between two
> comps.
> And - if I coul
> Assuming you are worried by people with promiscuous ethernet cards,
> packet-sniffing. Put in a second NIC, run a crossover UTP? I assume the
.. encrypting would solve that problem. or private network between two
comps.
And - if I could connect those two comps by some network daily data
trans
> I've used schemes such as piping data across an SSH process to achieve
> this without having to encrypt the files on disk. In fact, that's how our
That was the original scheme, but bosses hmmm, after some consultations
said that we should transfer data on cd-roms with armed guardian.
so now we'
Have you looked at the swappable disks broadcasters use?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 9:37 PM
> Subject: Transfer data between two comps without network
>
>
> > Welcome,
> > my problem is that I hav
Dariush,
Assuming you are worried by people with promiscuous ethernet cards,
packet-sniffing. Put in a second NIC, run a crossover UTP? I assume the
machine's are close by. Hotswapping a hard disk seems risky, if you do it
daily.
On the other hand, if you are not CPU constrained, run PPTP or
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> my problem is that I have to transfer large amount of data (20~50 Gigs)
> daily.
We do something similar to this.
> And it can't be done via network due to 'secret' nature of that data.
We do it by having a second NIC card on the machines using in
>| my problem is that I have to transfer large amount of data (20~50 Gigs)
>| daily.
>| And it can't be done via network due to 'secret' nature of that data.
>
>Umm...how about encrypting it prior to sending it across the network.
>I've used schemes such as piping data across an SSH process to
| Welcome,
| my problem is that I have to transfer large amount of data (20~50 Gigs)
| daily.
| And it can't be done via network due to 'secret' nature of that data.
Umm...how about encrypting it prior to sending it across the network.
I've used schemes such as piping data across an SSH proce
what about a Sony AIT tape drive. Kind of expensive. Not sure about the
linux support.
We have two of them and they are great and fast.
Ben MCSE, CNA
-Original Message-
From: Dariush Pietrzak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 9:38 AM
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
