On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 09:43:39AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 03:35:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I don't have the results after all this time. Exim beat postfix in raw
> > speed of moving mail in and/or out by over 15%.
>
> that must be specific to your part
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 09:43:39AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 03:35:33PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I don't have the results after all this time. Exim beat postfix in raw
> > speed of moving mail in and/or out by over 15%.
>
> that must be specific to your part
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:37:07PM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Craig Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:54 AM
> Subject: Re: Why doesn't Exim ever clean out /var/spool/exim/input?
>
>
> >
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:37:07PM +0100, Thomas GOIRAND wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Craig Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:54 AM
> Subject: Re: Why doesn't Exim ever clean out /var/spool/ex
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:36:29AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> i can't answer your question, but here's some relevant advice for you:
>
> exim doesn't scale. if you want performance, switch to postfix.
I'm curious why you say that. I have exim on 3 smtp gateway machines
servicing 11G+ email/da
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:36:29AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> i can't answer your question, but here's some relevant advice for you:
>
> exim doesn't scale. if you want performance, switch to postfix.
I'm curious why you say that. I have exim on 3 smtp gateway machines
servicing 11G+ email/da
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:25:52PM -0600, Andy Gardner wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2004, at 7:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >spf.pobox.com
>
> Am I correct in thinking that if I set up a TXT DNS record "v=spf1
> -all" for all domains that DON'T have email addresses attached to them,
> that thi
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:25:52PM -0600, Andy Gardner wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2004, at 7:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >spf.pobox.com
>
> Am I correct in thinking that if I set up a TXT DNS record "v=spf1
> -all" for all domains that DON'T have email addresses attached to them,
> that thi
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:59:18AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> One of the worst aspects of spam is the way much of it uses
> forged sender addresses. AOL is hoping to stir up some organized
> resistance to the practice of address forgery through a new
> e-mail protocol called Sender Permitted
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:59:18AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> One of the worst aspects of spam is the way much of it uses
> forged sender addresses. AOL is hoping to stir up some organized
> resistance to the practice of address forgery through a new
> e-mail protocol called Sender Permitted
Has anyone built any 4.x version of mailscanner and has the debs around?
I need to get mailscanner updated, and don't want to go through the pain
of rolling my own debs if I can possibly help it...
Tim
--
><
>> Tim Sailer (a
I've discovered a unique bug, I think. I ran dpkg-reconfigure debconf,
and selected readline, instead of dialog, and now it's prompting for
the admin password. Sheesh. All that time wasted...
Tim
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 12:50:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Guys-n-gals,
> I'm trying to b
Guys-n-gals,
I'm trying to build up an LDAP server on a Debian box that had
some base install of LDAP on it, someone mucked about, and then
left the company that hired me. I'm trying to install the latest slapd
on the box (running unstable). The package installs, and... nothing. I can't
get in, s
Folks,
I'm trying to get a business set up with a Debian system running Exim
talking to LDAP for user lookups. This is working fine, but right after
I was ready to get them to sign off on the project, they came up with
"Oh, does the old feature of [EMAIL PROTECTED] still work? We have
to have tha
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:32:11PM +0800, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> orange:/# apt-cache search drac
> drac - Dynamic Relay Authorization Control (pop-before-smtp)
> drac-dev - Dynamic Relay Authorization Control (development files)
> qpopper-drac - Qpopper with DRAC Support
Yeah. Most of my users are
I'm using multiple companies to give me good POP coverage, but I'm
having a bear of a time allowing my dialup users to be able to send
mail through my server, since I have the relaying locked down fairly
well. How is anyone doing this. I'm using exim. I've tinkered with the
idea of watching the rad
Simce I'm well on my way to being fully LDAP, I decided to try the
pam_mkhomedir module with ssh on a machine that actually will allow
a limited number of users shell access (controlled by the host attribute).
Well, it doesn't work, I think because of the priv. separation that
the Debian package de
Has anyone LDAPized their email system, along with /etc/aliases? If
so, can you give me a pointer how you did that?
Thanks,
Tim
--
><
>> Tim Sailer (at home) >< Coastal Internet,Inc. <<
>>
Has anyone LDAPized their email system, along with /etc/aliases? If
so, can you give me a pointer how you did that?
Thanks,
Tim
--
><
>> Tim Sailer (at home) >< Coastal Internet,Inc. <<
>>
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11:09:44PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> What's a good webmail system to use?
>
> There are several in Debian, I've had experience with IMP, but that
> experience has been mostly painful. Upgrading it is always difficult, and
> the packages insist on Postgresql even thou
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:42:03AM +0300, Alexandru Stefan-Voicu wrote:
> Does anyone know and can recommend me a good suite of administration programs
>for an ISP ?
> I mean web administration from a remote computer for:
> ProFTPD
> BIND
> Qm
Has anyone gotten this to work with logging to mysql? I'm trying to
set up a central logging host with an sql backend, but for some reason,
the mysql connection doesn't work. Running ldd on the binary, I don't
even see the mysql libs! This may require a bug report... :(
Tim
--
>>>
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 09:56:43AM +1100, Seung H. Lee wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:53:21PM -0500, Bob Billson wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:02:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > > If there is a way to get mutt to show size with maildir, I'd like to know
> > > > what it
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:28:28AM -0500, Bob Billson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:29:53AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > DEFAULT = $HOME/Maildir
> >
> > in either your /etc/procmailrc (for systemwide delivery) or in your
> > private .procmailrc for just you.
>
> Almost. It should b
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:09:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:14:03PM -0500, Bob Billson wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:20:11PM -0500, Tim Sailer wrote:
> > > OK, I'm number than I thought. I see nothing but a mere mention of
> > > maildir in one or two spo
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:14:03PM -0500, Bob Billson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:20:11PM -0500, Tim Sailer wrote:
> > OK, I'm number than I thought. I see nothing but a mere mention of
> > maildir in one or two spots. Can you give a little more obvious pointer?
>
> hrmm... You're right.
OK, folks. I appear to have the clueness of a head of cabbage. I want to
switch over to maildir in Exim, but, no matter what I try, I still get
the files in /var/spool/mail . Is there a working example somewhere?
Thanks,
Tim
--
>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:58:10PM +, falkom wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I try to install qmail + vpopmail in ldap server. It is not working
> well.
>
> Please, could you tell me any email server (POP/SMTP) to work well in
> ldap server, please?
The Debian default MTA, Exim, works with LDAP.
>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 03:27:07PM +1100, Andrew Tait wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A few days ago SSH just failed on me, out of the blue.
>
> Everytime I start ssh (/etc/init.d/ssh start), this appears in the auth.log
> file:
>
> Feb 25 13:50:44 porky sshd[453]: fatal: daemon() failed: Success
>
> I ca
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 03:27:07PM +1100, Andrew Tait wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A few days ago SSH just failed on me, out of the blue.
>
> Everytime I start ssh (/etc/init.d/ssh start), this appears in the auth.log
> file:
>
> Feb 25 13:50:44 porky sshd[453]: fatal: daemon() failed: Success
>
> I c
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 01:45:05PM -0600, Michael Merritt wrote:
> I'm looking for a support/ticket tracking application. Here are two I've
> found:
>
> Double Choco Latte: http://dcl.sourceforge.net/
> RT (Request Tracker): http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/
>
> I've started to set up RT, but
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 01:45:05PM -0600, Michael Merritt wrote:
> I'm looking for a support/ticket tracking application. Here are two I've
> found:
>
> Double Choco Latte: http://dcl.sourceforge.net/
> RT (Request Tracker): http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/
>
> I've started to set up RT, but
Hi, Folks.
I'm in the process of helping create a fully PAMified box with
LDAP authentication, and one thing I can not figure out how to work
is SAMBA and PAM. We've recompiled samba with PAM support, ldd shows
the pam libs linked, but authentication fails, and we never see any hits
on the LDAP s
Hi, Folks.
I'm in the process of helping create a fully PAMified box with
LDAP authentication, and one thing I can not figure out how to work
is SAMBA and PAM. We've recompiled samba with PAM support, ldd shows
the pam libs linked, but authentication fails, and we never see any hits
on the LDAP
OK, folks. I have a stumper here. An associate has a machine that was
upgraded to unstable in the last few days. The machine was rebooted today,
and came up in a very strange state. No users could log in, only root, and
things like ps, w, and top wouldn't work. I was called, got in via ssh,
and fi
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:54:58PM -0300, Fernando Casas wrote:
> Right now i?m using OpenWebmail (http://www.openwebmail.org) 1.53 . The
> implementation was t easy and smoothly that i can?t believe it. And my
> users are VERY happy. ;)
> We are using it for a few months and didn?t have any p
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:58:26AM +1030, James Mclean wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the
> latest .deb of OpenSSH...
>
> Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a
> login from the same machine's c
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:58:26AM +1030, James Mclean wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> I am building a debian woody machine as we speak, and i have installed the
> latest .deb of OpenSSH...
>
> Installed fine, but it fails to authenticate a remote login, and if i try a
> login from the same machine's
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:33:07AM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sigh... yes... some of our servers have been hit with the "SSH CRC-32
> compensation attack detector vulnerability" attack.
>
> some servers have been compromised, and the usual rootkit stuff (install
> root shells in /etc/inetd
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:33:07AM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sigh... yes... some of our servers have been hit with the "SSH CRC-32
> compensation attack detector vulnerability" attack.
>
> some servers have been compromised, and the usual rootkit stuff (install
> root shells in /etc/inet
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 10:30:43PM -0500, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> Is there a debian-firewall/router distro similar in function to
> smoothwall?
>
> All the server needs to do is act as a firewall/router for the
> internal lan and the webserver. It won't be offering any other
> services.
Storm Li
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 10:30:43PM -0500, Jesse Goerz wrote:
> Is there a debian-firewall/router distro similar in function to
> smoothwall?
>
> All the server needs to do is act as a firewall/router for the
> internal lan and the webserver. It won't be offering any other
> services.
Storm L
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:34:57PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:02:10AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> ...
> > you should be able to do that in your apache configuration - either deny
> > access to unencrypted connections or send a redirect to the encrypte
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:34:57PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 10:02:10AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> ...
> > you should be able to do that in your apache configuration - either deny
> > access to unencrypted connections or send a redirect to the encrypt
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 02:19:47PM +0200, Craigsc wrote:
> Hi scholars and gentlemen
>
> We are wanting to set-up a mailing list for our clients
> and were wondering which program(s) we should use. At
> present our mail is handled by exim.
Mailman. Smartlist is second choise. I have 7-8k users on
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 11:58:06AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Bug in the libc6 package ... check d-devel or d-user for a post today
> from Ben Collins. He's put a fixed version in his homedir and said
> package will appear in the archive soon (I imagine it's in incoming
> now).
Outstanding!
Does anyone know how to turn off the spp_http_decode module without
recompiling snort? It seems to be flagging every outbound web connection
on certain hosts as a Unicode attack...
Thanks,
Tim
--
><
>> Tim Sailer (at
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:22:09AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Saturday 05 May 2001 06:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Since we're on the subject of LDAP, one thing I hate about LDAP, and it
> > may be just my ignorance, is this: I'm use to using PH for mail routing.
> > Within PH, for the u
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:22:09AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Saturday 05 May 2001 06:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Since we're on the subject of LDAP, one thing I hate about LDAP, and it
> > may be just my ignorance, is this: I'm use to using PH for mail routing.
> > Within PH, for the
Since we're on the subject of LDAP, one thing I hate about LDAP, and it
may be just my ignorance, is this: I'm use to using PH for mail routing.
Within PH, for the user record, you can add many aliases for them,
which sendmail happily uses. I can't figure out how to do this with
LDAP! Does anyone
Since we're on the subject of LDAP, one thing I hate about LDAP, and it
may be just my ignorance, is this: I'm use to using PH for mail routing.
Within PH, for the user record, you can add many aliases for them,
which sendmail happily uses. I can't figure out how to do this with
LDAP! Does anyon
Hi All,
I've been asked to develop something like they have in Hotels,
where, when you plug into the building Network, and fire up
Nutscrape, the only thing you can get to is a page asking you
register your machine before you can get out on the Net.
Now I can't believe that this is so proprietar
Hi All,
I've been asked to develop something like they have in Hotels,
where, when you plug into the building Network, and fire up
Nutscrape, the only thing you can get to is a page asking you
register your machine before you can get out on the Net.
Now I can't believe that this is so proprieta
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:16:18PM -0700, Erik Abella wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> A persistent joker attacked me with lion, ramen, and I trojan I still
> haven't found. I fired-up the free ID-scripts from SANS; did a whole lot of
> combing the filesystems; done away with cgi-bin; retained only root an
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:16:18PM -0700, Erik Abella wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> A persistent joker attacked me with lion, ramen, and I trojan I still
> haven't found. I fired-up the free ID-scripts from SANS; did a whole lot of
> combing the filesystems; done away with cgi-bin; retained only root a
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 11:24:21AM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 01:09:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I saw somewhere recently a perl oneliner to convert epoch time to
> > normal time. Does anyone have this, or a pointer to it?
>
> You mean like:
>
> [durin:~] 159
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 11:24:21AM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 01:09:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I saw somewhere recently a perl oneliner to convert epoch time to
> > normal time. Does anyone have this, or a pointer to it?
>
> You mean like:
>
> [durin:~] 159
I saw somewhere recently a perl oneliner to convert epoch time to
normal time. Does anyone have this, or a pointer to it?
Thanks,
Tim
--
><
>> Tim Sailer (at home) >< Coastal Internet, Inc. <<
I saw somewhere recently a perl oneliner to convert epoch time to
normal time. Does anyone have this, or a pointer to it?
Thanks,
Tim
--
><
>> Tim Sailer (at home) >< Coastal Internet, Inc. <<
G'Day, fellow ISPers.
My user base is getting to the point where keeping flat /home, /var/mail
and other various directories is getting hard to maintain. Also, virtual
domain users add to the confusion. Is there a method out there already that
will allow the nice sorting of users (/home/a, /home/
G'Day, fellow ISPers.
My user base is getting to the point where keeping flat /home, /var/mail
and other various directories is getting hard to maintain. Also, virtual
domain users add to the confusion. Is there a method out there already that
will allow the nice sorting of users (/home/a, /home
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 02:37:29PM -0700, David Bishop wrote:
> [from /var/log/messages]
> Feb 19 15:29:56 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN 1 FROM masquerade.micron.com FOR
> db, Authentication failure
> Feb 19 15:29:58 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN SESSION FROM
> masquerade.micron.com FOR (null), Convers
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 02:37:29PM -0700, David Bishop wrote:
> [from /var/log/messages]
> Feb 19 15:29:56 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN 1 FROM masquerade.micron.com FOR
> db, Authentication failure
> Feb 19 15:29:58 server1 login: FAILED LOGIN SESSION FROM
> masquerade.micron.com FOR (null), Conver
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 08:42:04AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-2] Litzler Mihály wrote:
>
> > Okey, what do you think about the security of exim?
>
> I couldn't find any Exim advisories or incident or Vulnerability notes at
> CERT.
There are none.
> I found a J
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 08:42:04AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-2] Litzler Mihály wrote:
>
> > Okey, what do you think about the security of exim?
>
> I couldn't find any Exim advisories or incident or Vulnerability notes at
> CERT.
There are none.
> I found a
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> > My idea was to write a cron job that would get the current IP address, and
> > ftp over a file to a "well known server". As I am charged for each minute
> > that actual traffic flows, I do not wish to use dhis.net, as it sends a
> > packet each min
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> > My idea was to write a cron job that would get the current IP address, and
> > ftp over a file to a "well known server". As I am charged for each minute
> > that actual traffic flows, I do not wish to use dhis.net, as it sends a
> > packet each mi
OK, here's the picture. I have a Debian box as the SMTP gateway for
about 4000 active nodes on a class B network. Many of these machines
run sendmail, misconfigured, of course. I have MX records for the inside
machines in the DNS all pointing to the gateway, which is configured to
deny 3rd party r
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:08:05AM +1100, Nathan Ridge wrote:
> I am trying to write a script for a couple of novice admins that changes
> shell to bash from false, logs in, runs elm from where they can purge
> certain emails from a users mailbox and then exit to change the shell back
> to false.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:42:35AM -0800, Duane Powers wrote:
> Is he going to be using static ip's?
Yup. It's for his business.
> I don't know of any ISP that will perform the routing nescessary for
> this for DSL customers (not enough revenue.)
>
> If he is just using dynamic ip's, and runni
Hi folks,
I have a client that wants a fast reliable connection into their
office complex. I'm trying to sell him a T1, but he keeps looking at
DSL rates, and wants that. I think I impressed on him enough about the
lack of reliability in DSL, so he asked if you could get 2 DSL lines
and have one
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:14:50AM +1100, Marc-Adrian Napoli wrote:
> hi,
>
> have a wierd problem here. we have standard debian box here running wuftp,
> as well as an NT box with iis 5.0. (and ftp)
>
> a particular customer sitting behind a NAT'd firewall cant connect to our
> debian wuftp ser
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:19:18PM -0800, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:10:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a Debian box with 2 NICs. Both 100Meg, running in full duplex. This
> > machine is running as a ftp proxy. As part of the traffic going through the
> > bo
- Forwarded message from Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>From tps Wed Jan 3 17:38:17 2001
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:37:56 -0500
From: Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network Throughput
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Resent-Message-ID:
Rese
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 12:38:03PM -0500, Ryan Golbeck wrote:
> Hello;
>
> I've been trying to setup mailman to manage some mailing lists with exim
> but I'm having troubles whenever mailman has to send mail off host. I've
> been getting this sort of error in my exim/mainlog:
>
> 2000-12-15 00:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 04:01:41PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Has anyone gotten lvm to work under Linux? I remember with fondness my AIX
> > experience with lvm. I'd love to see it work on some of my big boxen.
> >
> > Tim
>
> Yes, I am running it here
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 05:30:34PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> test10 and test11 both worked fine for me in my tests. I've heard some
> reports of file system problems with test11 so I'm running test10.
test 11 has been working fine for me, even under heavy load (mail exploder
where the load
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 06:15:13PM +, Kozman Balint wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Can someone tell me how to make a linux box able to accept a PPP request?
> Whowatch says the AutoPPP user is authenticated, but it gets kicked out
> after 2 secs. I'm using mgetty to accept PPP. What can be wrong?
www.b
Has anyone gotten lvm to work at all? This is what I get:
unslept:~# uname -a
Linux unslept 2.4.0-test10 #2 Mon Nov 13 07:28:48 EST 2000 i586 unknown
unslept:~# /etc/init.d/lvm stop
Shutting down LVM Volume Groups...
vgchange -- invalid i/o protocol version
unslept:~# /etc/init.d/lvm start
Setti
'Lo Folks,
In an effort to expand our VPN services, I'm looking at any opensource
VPN solution I can find to replace our Shiva box. What I'd love to see
is to be able to set up a Linux box with the VPN server software running
on it, and to have IPSec compliant clients (wintel, linux, slowaris, m
I know I'm not the first one to try this out, but I can't find anything
on the exim site, so I turn to you guys. :)
As many of you know, I work at bnl.gov (Brookhaven National Lab) during
the day. I've implemented a Perimeter Defense network (firewall) utilizing
a Cisco Pix, and application proxie
I know I'm not the first one to try this out, but I can't find anything
on the exim site, so I turn to you guys. :)
As many of you know, I work at bnl.gov (Brookhaven National Lab) during
the day. I've implemented a Perimeter Defense network (firewall) utilizing
a Cisco Pix, and application proxi
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 08:00:02AM -0500, Gregory Wood wrote:
> When the customer trys to send to an account outside the local ISP's control,
> it receives an immediate 'look-up' error (i.e. DNS failure). Likewise when an
> outside account tries to access the customer, they get an 'account not fo
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 08:00:02AM -0500, Gregory Wood wrote:
> When the customer trys to send to an account outside the local ISP's control, it
>receives an immediate 'look-up' error (i.e. DNS failure). Likewise when an outside
>account tries to access the customer, they get an 'account not fou
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 11:35:10PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
> Check the Readme's with the Kernel source - there is actualy a device you
> have to mount in your fstab file (you know, for bootup;) that enables
> shared memory. It uses a "imaginary" mount point like /proc does.
OK, I found it. It actual
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 11:35:10PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
> Check the Readme's with the Kernel source - there is actualy a device you
> have to mount in your fstab file (you know, for bootup;) that enables
> shared memory. It uses a "imaginary" mount point like /proc does.
OK, I found it. It actua
Maybe I missed it, but what's the deal with the new kernels (2.4.0xxx)
and shared memory? From top:
CPU states: 5.2% user, 1.8% system, 0.0% nice, 93.0% idle
Mem: 78592K av, 75848K used, 2744K free, 0K shrd, 1932K buff
Swap: 185464K av, 11520K used, 173944K free
Has anyone had any luck getting the lvm stuff to work?
Tim
--
><
>> Tim Sailer (at home) >< Coastal Internet, Inc. <<
>> Network and Systems Operations >< PO Box 671 <<
Maybe I missed it, but what's the deal with the new kernels (2.4.0xxx)
and shared memory? From top:
CPU states: 5.2% user, 1.8% system, 0.0% nice, 93.0% idle
Mem: 78592K av, 75848K used, 2744K free, 0K shrd, 1932K buff
Swap: 185464K av, 11520K used, 173944K free
Has anyone had any luck getting the lvm stuff to work?
Tim
--
><
>> Tim Sailer (at home) >< Coastal Internet, Inc. <<
>> Network and Systems Operations >< PO Box 671 <
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 04:53:15PM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> Folks,
>
> A client wants me to place squid on his Linux box, not with an idea to
> improve response, but to be able to see what staff are upto. Ethical
> issues are dealt with, in the sense that staff have been formally informed
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 04:53:15PM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> Folks,
>
> A client wants me to place squid on his Linux box, not with an idea to
> improve response, but to be able to see what staff are upto. Ethical
> issues are dealt with, in the sense that staff have been formally informed
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 12:18:09PM +0100, Chris Evans wrote:
> I posted a request for help with bouncing or blackholing an idiot's
> Email at SMTP or TCP/IP level on a Hamm/Sendmail 8.9 box.
> (Idiot has set up a dire holiday autoresponder.) No response from
> you wonderful people.
You can
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 12:18:09PM +0100, Chris Evans wrote:
> I posted a request for help with bouncing or blackholing an idiot's
> Email at SMTP or TCP/IP level on a Hamm/Sendmail 8.9 box.
> (Idiot has set up a dire holiday autoresponder.) No response from
> you wonderful people.
You can
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 05:28:54PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:43:20PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> > At 07:29 PM 5/16/00 -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> > >Autoinstall (Red Hat's kickstart)
> > > This is also something fairly important. We need this as we do a
> > > lot
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 09:59:24AM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> At the risk of asking twice:
>
> Please someone recommend a web based help-desk type tracking system to me.
>
> I'd like it to be flexible, stable, and fairly straightforward to setup
> and administer.
>
> It doesn't have to do ev
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 06:55:13PM +1000, Neale Banks wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> Any recommendations on a *reliable* ethernet card to spec for a Debian
> (potato) box to be deployed as a dedicated mail exchanger?
>
> Not thinking so much of the fastest, as something that will reliably pump
> dat
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 08:12:06PM +0400, Alex Toropov wrote:
> I'd like to organize authentication by using some kind of RADIUS server.
> (cistron for example)
> Can any one give me some steps in making this ?
> I was looking for some PAM way of making this, but I didn't find any PAM
> authentic
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:38:34AM +, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> I installed Exim on a spare server of ours (Debian/Sparc) to act as a
> secondary MX for all of the domains we host. It worked like a charm from
> the moment I installed it with one small problem.
>
> There are getting to be a lot
99 matches
Mail list logo
