Re: Anybody Running OpenWebMail ?

2004-01-15 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
Grzegorz Marsza?ek³ek schrieb: We use it with a lot of success. It servers for web interface to mail for around 2000 customers - we are quite happy with. Then you might be able to answer me a question -- is it possible to use OpenWebmail with different "mail" users? Let me elaborate: Usually you

Re: Anybody Running OpenWebMail ?

2004-01-15 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
Grzegorz Marsza?ek³ek schrieb: We use it with a lot of success. It servers for web interface to mail for around 2000 customers - we are quite happy with. Then you might be able to answer me a question -- is it possible to use OpenWebmail with different "mail" users? Let me elaborate: Usually you

Re: named + virtual domains

2003-10-03 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
Rod Rodolico wrote: Does anyone know the correct way to set up virtual domains (all pointing to one IP). I simply create A records for them, but nslint complains because my reverse DNS points back to one domain. It doesn't seem right to put multiple PTR records for the same IP. Is it just nslin

Re: named: everything working except

2003-10-03 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
Travis Loyd wrote: I have figured out how to host a domain such as foo.net. I can make these work: mail.foo.net www.foo.net etc... But I haven't figured out how to make 'foo.net' work... instead a user will have to type in the 'www.' or it won't work. @ A 1.2.3.4 -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: Server hacked - next...?

2003-06-30 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:00:57 +0800, Jason Lim wrote: >Is there a document somewhere, or procedure, to recover after this? It's as simple as reinstalling. There's no other way, you can't get around this... -- L I N U X .~. The Choice /V\ of a GNU /( )\ Generation

Re: Server hacked - next...?

2003-06-30 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:00:57 +0800, Jason Lim wrote: >Is there a document somewhere, or procedure, to recover after this? It's as simple as reinstalling. There's no other way, you can't get around this... -- L I N U X .~. The Choice /V\ of a GNU /( )\ Generation

Re: How were the apache debs compiled ?

2003-04-16 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:36:11 +0200, Maarten van der Hoef wrote: >I wonder how the apache of apache..deb & apache-common..deb (woody) was compiled, >the ./configure line ... etc. Get yourself the packages' source code from the Debian packages page (original tar.gz package plus Debian-specific d

Re: How to handle mail for multiple (10-15) domains w/o localpart conflicts?

2003-04-07 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Sun, 06 Apr 2003 22:04:32 +0200, Markus Welsch wrote: >> Well, performance is not a problem for me. As I already mentioned I'm just >> hosting a dozen of domains with only a couple of (low-use) mailboxes >> altogether. > >Well that really doesn't make a difference, but nevermind ! Well, I th

Re: How to handle mail for multiple (10-15) domains w/o localpart conflicts?

2003-04-07 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Mon, 07 Apr 2003 10:13:43 +1000 (EST), Brad Lay wrote: [...] >I've just setup this exact same thing on my mail server. You don't need >any debian packages for everything. Heres my configs. Thanks for sharing this with us. As I already pointed out I would really like a solution that can be rea

Re: How to handle mail for multiple (10-15) domains w/o localpart conflicts?

2003-04-07 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Mon, 07 Apr 2003 12:12:46 +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: [...] >> I don't want to move away from Exim unless there are serious (or even >> compelling) reasons to do so. > >This has to rate as a FAQ. Time to start documenting it in the wiki; > >http://wiki.debian.net/EmailConfiguration > >Include

Re: How to handle mail for multiple (10-15) domains w/o localpart conflicts?

2003-04-06 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Sun, 06 Apr 2003 19:14:03 +0200, Markus Welsch wrote: >> I don't want to move away from Exim unless there are serious (or even >> compelling) reasons to do so. > >Okay everybody should know which MTA to use and why. I moved a way from >Exim right after a performance comparison with Postfix, e

Re: How to handle mail for multiple (10-15) domains w/o localpart conflicts?

2003-04-06 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Sun, 06 Apr 2003 20:34:30 +0200, Marcin Sochacki wrote: [...] >http://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/vmail-sql/ Upon first look this looks nice -- but there's no Debian package available (AFAIC gather), and it needs tpop3d which also isn't Debianized yet. :-( Anyway, I've added the above to my boo

Re: How to handle mail for multiple (10-15) domains w/o localpart conflicts?

2003-04-06 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Sun, 06 Apr 2003 17:55:04 +0200, Markus Welsch wrote: [...] >Do you need to use Exim ? Or could you switch to Postfix also ? Postfix I don't want to move away from Exim unless there are serious (or even compelling) reasons to do so. >has a very powerful virtual user configuration - virtual_

How to handle mail for multiple (10-15) domains w/o localpart conflicts?

2003-04-06 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
Hi there, is there a package, HOWTO, or FAQ that aids in or describes how to setup your Debian box (with Exim as the MTA) to handle mail for multiple (some 10-15) domains without conflicts in the local part of incoming mail? Maybe even let them add/delete/configure mailboxes using a web interfa

Re: PPP dial-up server w/ multiple eth adapters: "operation not permitted"

2000-05-23 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Tue, 23 May 2000 09:12:04 -0200 (GMT+2), Kasparavicius Andrius wrote: [...] >> I use mgetty which properly transfers the call to pppd. The clients >> gets its >> correct IP address, but it can't ping the p-t-p address, nor can I ping >> the >> client from the server. If I try to do so I get a

RE: Exim Subject rejection, (* **** ***)

2000-05-04 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Thu, 04 May 2000 15:24:35 -0400 (EDT), Paul Kallstrom wrote: >It looks like the only system filtering that is >functional under exim, is sender based. > >Since I need to filter by subject, it looks like it's back to sendmail. WRONG!! = exim.conf == message_filter = /e