On Sun, 06 Apr 2003 19:14:03 +0200, Markus Welsch wrote:

>> I don't want to move away from Exim unless there are serious (or even 
>> compelling) reasons to do so.
>
>Okay everybody should know which MTA to use and why. I moved a way from 
>Exim right after a performance comparison with Postfix, etc :-)

Well, performance is not a problem for me. As I already mentioned I'm just 
hosting a dozen of domains with only a couple of (low-use) mailboxes 
altogether.

>> I read that Cyrus doesn't use mailbox files. This is a "con," IMHO, because 
>> that way I can't easily browse mail using "mutt" (or can I?!)
>
>Well you can use POP3/IMAP to connect to your mailbox :-) And anyways I 

Sure, but I like the option of quickly having a glance at them using "Mutt," 
in case something goes wrong etc. This way I can ssh in and remove offending 
mails, instead having to telnet to 110 and DELE it.

>don't know how Exim handles that but with Postfix you have transport 
>maps like you could say,
>
>       mail.server.tld local:
>
>To avoid the usage of Cyrus for mail.server.tld :-)

What exactly does the above do? I'm sorry but I don't quite get your point.

>> There doesn't seem to be a Debian package available?!
>
>I think there is but not at packages.debian.org. As a hint: Don't rely 
>on that Debian package - it looks a bit faulty. I did a manual install 
>which worked fine ...

This option I will only consider if there is NO OTHER WAY. I've once started 
to do that and I have very soon regretted that I did so, so I don't want to 
repeat that mistake again.

>How do you do your system monitoring BTW?

"mon" and "logcheck" is what I use to monitor my stuff. It pretty much does 
what I want.

Ralf


-- 
   L I N U X       .~.
  The  Choice      /V\
   of a  GNU      /( )\
  Generation      ^^-^^



Reply via email to