On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 08:47, Jonathan G - Mailing Lists wrote:
> Comment in line
>
> Andreas John wrote:
>
> > 4.) Hint: If you setup VLAN with /etc/network/interfaces please keep in
> > mind that the physical interface has to be up in order to create VLANs
> > on it, i.e. you have to set somme
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 00:59, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
> > apparently this can be done by setting up /etc/whois.conf, but I can't
> > work out what the syntax is. There's no docs, or any examples...I've
> > tried all the obvious approaches.
> OTOH you could also use the env variable:
>
> WHOIS_SERV
hi,
whois ships with a default whois server of whois.internic.net.
I want to change this to whois.apnic.net.
apparently this can be done by setting up /etc/whois.conf, but I can't
work out what the syntax is. There's no docs, or any examples...I've
tried all the obvious approaches.
has anyone d
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 18:36, Oliver Hitz wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
> > I'm using that. But I'm applying against a 2.4.26 kernel-source from
> > backports.org..
> >
> > 2.4.26 from sarge
>
> No, the kernel from kern
I'm using that. But I'm applying against a 2.4.26 kernel-source from
backports.org..
2.4.26 from sarge
hmm. time to diff.
jamie
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 17:50, Oliver Hitz wrote:
> Hi Jamie
>
> On 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
> > Has anyone successfully
Hi,
Has anyone successfully applied the MD5/BGP patch above to a stock (well
backported) 2.4.26 kernel?
witness:
fxroute:/usr/src/linux# patch --dry-run -p1
Hi,
I'm using Vtun to do some encrypted tunnelling, and my Vtun client is
refusing to forward packets. I've set /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to
1, yet I see icmp requests coming in on the clients tun interface, but
nothing leaves on the clients eth0 interface...
has anyone come across something
Hi,
I'm using Vtun to do some encrypted tunnelling, and my Vtun client is
refusing to forward packets. I've set /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to
1, yet I see icmp requests coming in on the clients tun interface, but
nothing leaves on the clients eth0 interface...
has anyone come across something
www.nagios.org.
it rocks.
jamie
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 22:07, Craig wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Is there software that we can install to monitor our servers and sms us
> if there are only problems ?
>
> Something like Big Brother but open source would be preferable.
>
> Any suggestions will be apprec
www.nagios.org.
it rocks.
jamie
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 22:07, Craig wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Is there software that we can install to monitor our servers and sms us
> if there are only problems ?
>
> Something like Big Brother but open source would be preferable.
>
> Any suggestions will be apprec
If you want something to build on, then maybe IRM might do it.
php/mysql.
We've hacked it too met our needs - it seems ok.
It's a debian package too.
jamie
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 06:35, Chris G. wrote:
> Well it's finally hit the point where we have a few machines where we have
> no idea what's
If you want something to build on, then maybe IRM might do it.
php/mysql.
We've hacked it too met our needs - it seems ok.
It's a debian package too.
jamie
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 06:35, Chris G. wrote:
> Well it's finally hit the point where we have a few machines where we have
> no idea what's
so how does exim compare in all of this?
jamie
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 18:10, Alex Borges wrote:
> It all depends
>
> qmail has a very non standard way of being managed. Its almost
> meta-unix. That said, its VERY flexible, extremely powerfull, once you
> get a hang of it INCREDEBLY EASY to manag
13 matches
Mail list logo
