so how does exim compare in all of this? jamie
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 18:10, Alex Borges wrote: > It all depends.... > > qmail has a very non standard way of being managed. Its almost > meta-unix. That said, its VERY flexible, extremely powerfull, once you > get a hang of it INCREDEBLY EASY to manage. And it has no paralell in > security (AGES and AGES better than sendmail) > > Sadly, its non free. You cannot distribute binaries of it, you can not > distribute it modified (have to distribute the patches separately). Even > if debian has very good packages for it, the license defeats the good > system in debian so you still have to go through some extra work to get > it to work. Anything you want to do to it in terms of features is patch > and recompile. > > Anyhow, qmail is what i use for the big things, postfix for the small > things, sendmail is an urban legend. I HATE it. > > El jue, 04-09-2003 a las 00:43, Rudi Starcevic escribió: > > Hi, > > > > Sorry to bother you all with this repeat question. > > I've have searched around and seen plenty of opinions but I'd like to > > ask again and get the latest from this list. > > > > Sendmail or Qmail ? That is my question. > > > > Currently we use Sendmail. It's worked fine, well actually problem free > > so better than fine - I've got the Sendmail book and all. > > However we will be setting up some new email servers soon and I'm > > considering Qmail. > > > > As I hold this list in high regard I'll base my final decision on the > > feedback I get from this list. > > > > At this stage I'm leaning towards sticking with Sendmail but something > > inside wants to know more about Qmail. > > > > If you *had* to pick one of these two which would it be ? > > > > Many thanks > > Best regards > > Rudi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]