On Wednesday 29 September 2004 13:38, Aurélien Beaujean wrote:
> Hi,
> The only way to have mageraid at boot time is to include it in builtin
> (not in module) in the kernel. So rebuild a 2.4.27 with the same custom
> options than your old 2.4.21.
That's interesting..
Since I wrote, I did some m
Hullo.
I've often wondered this but never been able to find a solution.. so here we
go...
I'm using a custom Debianised kernel on a Dell poweredge 1600SC with the AMI
megaraid module compiled into the kernel. Also, the kernel has no module
support
It's still running 2.4.21 and disk performan
Hi :)
We have a site with a series of sub-domains by country, e.g.
www.uk.domain.com, www.fr.domain.com etc. but we are moving away from this to
a single 'www.domain.com' (for various reasons)..
The problem is that now we want to have the site apply the same themes as it
currently does, but b
On Friday 03 September 2004 06:28, Dave Watkins wrote:
> >After that is done you can delete the old raid1 completly and add the now
> > free disk to the raid5...
> Ralph Paßgang wrote:
> I've actually done this exact thing before and it worked flawlessly.
Ooh you lovely people - thank you for the
On Thursday 02 September 2004 14:18, Mark Janssen wrote:
> Nope... migrating to a different raid configuration wipes your disks
> So you'll have to backup, migrate and restore.
That's a shame - I kinda knew that was the answer but hoped I'd missed
something :)
gdh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello - just a quickie :)
If I construct a RAID1 with two 200GB disks, will I be able to add a third
disk and convert the whole set to a 400GB RAID5 later on by logically
removing the second disk from the RAID1 set?
Cheers,
Gavin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Friday 02 July 2004 16:12, Paul Romero wrote:
> Dear User Group:
>
> I have the "woody" version of Debian installed on my
> machine with 2 serial ports and can't use them.
How are you trying to use them? What application do you have listening or
trying to open /dev/ttyS0 and/or /dev/ttyS1 ?
On Friday 02 July 2004 16:12, Paul Romero wrote:
> Dear User Group:
>
> I have the "woody" version of Debian installed on my
> machine with 2 serial ports and can't use them.
How are you trying to use them? What application do you have listening or
trying to open /dev/ttyS0 and/or /dev/ttyS1 ?
On Thursday 17 June 2004 14:09, Dale E Martin wrote:
> Hello. I run a small mailserver, and I'm interested in allowing my users
> to relay mail off of it. I'm currently using exim4 as my MTA, and uw-imap
> for client mail access. In the past I have used "exact"[0] to allow
> "pop-before-relay" a
On Thursday 17 June 2004 14:09, Dale E Martin wrote:
> Hello. I run a small mailserver, and I'm interested in allowing my users
> to relay mail off of it. I'm currently using exim4 as my MTA, and uw-imap
> for client mail access. In the past I have used "exact"[0] to allow
> "pop-before-relay" a
On Monday 14 June 2004 14:57, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> This may be obvious, but not to me... is there any difference compared
> to using iptables DNAT?
At the time I was using rinetd/netcat to do this kind of work, I didn't know
enough about iptables and the SNAT/DNAT pair w
On Monday 14 June 2004 14:57, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> This may be obvious, but not to me... is there any difference compared
> to using iptables DNAT?
At the time I was using rinetd/netcat to do this kind of work, I didn't know
enough about iptables and the SNAT/DNAT pair w
On Monday 14 June 2004 11:16, Andreas John wrote:
> Hello!
> apt-cache show rinetd
> Package: rinetd
Yep, rinetd is a simple userspace proxy. I used it for a while, but it had a
few unpleasant 'features' I didn't like (we were using dynamic DNS with it,
so I expect you wouldn't encounter them)
On Monday 14 June 2004 11:16, Andreas John wrote:
> Hello!
> apt-cache show rinetd
> Package: rinetd
Yep, rinetd is a simple userspace proxy. I used it for a while, but it had a
few unpleasant 'features' I didn't like (we were using dynamic DNS with it,
so I expect you wouldn't encounter them)
On Thursday 22 April 2004 17:56, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> Some of my clients use POP, however. I thought about doing a
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] style address for them and having this simply append
> spam into a special folder on their account. Any suggestions? Has anyone
> ever done this?
This could work
On Thursday 22 April 2004 17:56, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> Some of my clients use POP, however. I thought about doing a
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] style address for them and having this simply append
> spam into a special folder on their account. Any suggestions? Has anyone
> ever done this?
This could work
On Monday 29 March 2004 13:30, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> Hi
> Is there an easy way that checks if /var/lib/dpkg/info md5sums are the same
> md5sums of the files in the system? Or should I do an script doing this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search deb md5
debsums - Verify installed package fi
On Monday 29 March 2004 13:30, Tomàs Núñez Lirola wrote:
> Hi
> Is there an easy way that checks if /var/lib/dpkg/info md5sums are the same
> md5sums of the files in the system? Or should I do an script doing this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search deb md5
debsums - Verify installed package fi
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 14:03, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
> I have an old version of Postfix running on my Debian box. I don't remember
> if I used apt-get or installed from a .tgz file. If I use apt-get install I
> am concerned I could end up with two version of Postfix. What's the best way
> to upgrad
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 14:03, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
> I have an old version of Postfix running on my Debian box. I don't remember
> if I used apt-get or installed from a .tgz file. If I use apt-get install I
> am concerned I could end up with two version of Postfix. What's the best way
> to upgrad
On Saturday 14 February 2004 00:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm afraid I can't offer any insights into why your card isn't working with
the natsemi module in 2.4.18, but may I suggest you use a more recent
backported kernel for woody available at:
http://www.backports.org/debian/dists/woody/ke
On Saturday 14 February 2004 00:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm afraid I can't offer any insights into why your card isn't working with
the natsemi module in 2.4.18, but may I suggest you use a more recent
backported kernel for woody available at:
http://www.backports.org/debian/dists/woody/ke
On Thursday 12 February 2004 17:21, Emmanuel Halbwachs wrote:
> May I ask you how did you manage this ? With an other plain disk ?
Sure,
I made a custom kernel bootfloppy (rescue floppy) then used the normal bf2.4
root.bin after that :)
I used information from various sources at the time (this
On Thursday 12 February 2004 17:21, Emmanuel Halbwachs wrote:
> May I ask you how did you manage this ? With an other plain disk ?
Sure,
I made a custom kernel bootfloppy (rescue floppy) then used the normal bf2.4
root.bin after that :)
I used information from various sources at the time (this
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 09:00, Markus Oswald wrote:
> Am Mi, den 11.02.2004 schrieb Emmanuel Halbwachs um 20:12:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I've just suscribed to the list after discovering it recently. I'm
> > not strictly an ISP, but I provide various services for 150-200 users.
Woody works jus
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 09:00, Markus Oswald wrote:
> Am Mi, den 11.02.2004 schrieb Emmanuel Halbwachs um 20:12:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I've just suscribed to the list after discovering it recently. I'm
> > not strictly an ISP, but I provide various services for 150-200 users.
Woody works jus
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 09:46, Craig Schneider wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Can anyone recommend software to graph Cisco's netflow traffic on Debian
Not a Debian package, but it's only 4 Perl scripts...
http://flavio.sf.net/
It has a few caveats, the biggest of which seems to be that it won't
actually up
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 09:46, Craig Schneider wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Can anyone recommend software to graph Cisco's netflow traffic on Debian
Not a Debian package, but it's only 4 Perl scripts...
http://flavio.sf.net/
It has a few caveats, the biggest of which seems to be that it won't
actually up
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 11:12, Ian Forbes wrote:
> This wont remove the requirement for us to carry on using cgiemail, many
> of the pages we host use it. However maybe we should start weaning the
> webmasters onto something new.
Do have a look at http://nms-cgi.sf.net/ - you can find versions o
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 11:12, Ian Forbes wrote:
> This wont remove the requirement for us to carry on using cgiemail, many
> of the pages we host use it. However maybe we should start weaning the
> webmasters onto something new.
Do have a look at http://nms-cgi.sf.net/ - you can find versions o
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 14:34, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote:
> Diskless workstations. so you probably are already running a
> centralized syslog?
Nope, I wasn't interested in any local messages, but of course this is
the perfect solution!
Beautiful - thankyou :)
gdh
Hi :)
Whilst I appreciate 'ISP' isn't quite the right context for this query,
I feel the audience has enough of an overlap :)
I'm running NIS on woody with no problems at all in the auth / shadow
file, etc. but I'd like to be able to track when each user logs in and
out, (basically a computer-bas
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 14:34, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote:
> Diskless workstations. so you probably are already running a
> centralized syslog?
Nope, I wasn't interested in any local messages, but of course this is
the perfect solution!
Beautiful - thankyou :)
gdh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi :)
Whilst I appreciate 'ISP' isn't quite the right context for this query,
I feel the audience has enough of an overlap :)
I'm running NIS on woody with no problems at all in the auth / shadow
file, etc. but I'd like to be able to track when each user logs in and
out, (basically a computer-bas
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 19:34, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> I can not think of any drawbacks to doing it. I only offer web, ftp and
> mail service (apache, proftp and exim). The only thing I can think of is
> that reverse dns will not work correctly, but I see no reason that should
> impact these ser
On Saturday 13 September 2003 10:27, axacheng wrote:
> Hello List :
>
> i known apache stress-tool "ab" can suffice for me, but "ab" seems can not
> generate graphical reports to me
Google for 'siege' - I've been using it recently to simulate heavy web
traffic, and whilst I have no need for g
On Friday 22 August 2003 21:46, Martin Wheeler wrote:
> Just caught the end of this ... may be applicable to a problem I'm
> experiencing myself. (Not ProFTP, but gFTP.)
>
> As far as I know, one of my firewalls is the Mandrake SNF (Simple Network
> Firewall ?), running under 2.2.19. (I'm fairly
On Thursday 21 August 2003 10:41 pm, Ahtonín Karásek wrote:
> Thank you very much :o)
> Only one more question: Is posible to use this approach while firewall is
> on the same machine as FTP server? I own only one computer :o)
Certainly, just add that line, and add it to the INPUT and OUTPUT chain
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:39:05PM +0200, Ahton?n Kar?sek wrote:
> PassivePorts2000 2200
>
> But ProFTP seem not to read this :) It's not possible to build firewall without this
> feature :(
> Is there anybody knows, where the problem can be?
Is the firewall in question a Lin
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 3:50 pm, Antonin Karasek wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I just bought DELL PowerEdge 2600 with $SUBJECT. I'm trying to install
> Debian to it. Unfortunatelly, DELL is supporting the RedHat only. The
> problem is, that Debian instalation program don't find $SUBJECT and say:
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 4:16 pm, you wrote:
> Greetings!
Hullo! :)
> I guess NEAT is trying to open the files in R/W mode - which will fail
> as the web server process UID probably is WWW-DATA, but all files are
> -rw-r--r-- and owned by ROOT. Try CHOWNing the files to WWW-DATA
Oh of course :D
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 3:48 pm, Wim Fournier wrote:
> > I'm running woody with no funny stuff or backports, and have installed
> > Netsaint and the netsaint-neat CGI config editor.
>
> Are you running netsaint?? In my opinion its much better to install Nagios
> instead as netsaint is not being d
Hullo :)
I've been an avid Debian user for a couple of years now, and I'm quite
competent with what I do, but now and again something comes along that just
doesn't make sense at all, and this, happy people, is one of those times :)
I'm running woody with no funny stuff or backports, and have in
On Saturday 05 July 2003 11:52 pm, Martin WHEELER wrote:
> Solutions suggested so far have been to turn off, or make completely
> transparent, any firewall between you and them (!!!); or to turn off
> passive ftp mode. (makes no difference, incidentally)
It sounds like they are now denying all in
On Saturday 05 July 2003 11:52 pm, Martin WHEELER wrote:
> Solutions suggested so far have been to turn off, or make completely
> transparent, any firewall between you and them (!!!); or to turn off
> passive ftp mode. (makes no difference, incidentally)
It sounds like they are now denying all in
Hi :)
I've been trying to learn mod_rewrite to do /anything/ and I'm failing. Please
take pity on me, oh mighty ones ! ;)
I wanted to use mod_rewrite as a technology test, and to learn something new,
but it has simply driven me to distraction... perhaps someone could help?
I have a woody box (
Hi :)
I've been trying to learn mod_rewrite to do /anything/ and I'm failing. Please
take pity on me, oh mighty ones ! ;)
I wanted to use mod_rewrite as a technology test, and to learn something new,
but it has simply driven me to distraction... perhaps someone could help?
I have a woody box (
On Saturday 07 June 2003 16:25, Gregory Machin wrote:
> 1 ) I need to upgrade libc6 to a test version so i can install clamav ,
> but it has a lot of dependanies .. how do i install the new version ?
You have three real options, one of which you've already identified ->
upgrading to testing or u
On Saturday 07 June 2003 16:25, Gregory Machin wrote:
> 1 ) I need to upgrade libc6 to a test version so i can install clamav ,
> but it has a lot of dependanies .. how do i install the new version ?
You have three real options, one of which you've already identified ->
upgrading to testing or u
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 8:28 pm, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
> Monitoring vmstat output? I feel vmstat gives you all relevant data in
> one place: memory, disk, cpu.
>
> Sorry, no advise on how to collect this from the network.
inetd?
inetd.conf:
vmstat stream tcp nowait root
> I have restarted all daemons several times but /var/log/mysql.log shows no
> accesses coinciding with scanned messages.
The only thing I can think of is the 'localhost' specified in the DBI
connect string is trying to connect on 127.0.0.1 to TCP port 3306. Debian
disables TCP connections for MyS
> I have restarted all daemons several times but /var/log/mysql.log shows no
> accesses coinciding with scanned messages.
The only thing I can think of is the 'localhost' specified in the DBI
connect string is trying to connect on 127.0.0.1 to TCP port 3306. Debian
disables TCP connections for MyS
Ah... I found this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=148484&repeatmerged=yes
and after putting 'DROPPRIVS=yes' in /etc/procmailrc, spamassassin works..
But I still don't understand /why/ I need it on one machine, and not on
another! :///
gdh
Hi, I just set up spamassassin on a customer's machine, and was surprised
how smooth the installation was (I just added a section to /etc/procmailrc
as described in /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/examples/procmailrc.example)...
However, my home machine is also running Debian woody and I'm getting thi
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:52:14PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> I thought of using courier-mlm too, because I am using courier-imap/pop
> already. It needs courier-maildrop though,
The debian package name is just called 'maildrop' :)
gdh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:52:14PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> I thought of using courier-mlm too, because I am using courier-imap/pop
> already. It needs courier-maildrop though,
The debian package name is just called 'maildrop' :)
gdh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:09:39AM -0600, Michael Merritt wrote:
> What package do I need to install to get mod_php support for PHP4 in Apache?
> I installed the php4 package, but my php scripts are still not being parsed.
Check your /etc/apache/httpd.conf for this line... it's around line 240
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:09:39AM -0600, Michael Merritt wrote:
> What package do I need to install to get mod_php support for PHP4 in Apache?
> I installed the php4 package, but my php scripts are still not being parsed.
Check your /etc/apache/httpd.conf for this line... it's around line 240
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:12:34AM +0100, James wrote:
>
> For potato (?) of course.
This should be pretty trivial..
Since you're in potato, it might be easier to simply download the 3
source files from the /pool directory on a debian mirror. There will be
a .dsc file, a .diff file and a .orig
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:12:34AM +0100, James wrote:
>
> For potato (?) of course.
This should be pretty trivial..
Since you're in potato, it might be easier to simply download the 3
source files from the /pool directory on a debian mirror. There will be
a .dsc file, a .diff file and a .ori
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:09:27PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi List !
>
> I?d like to get a Firewalling LINUX with IPTABLES into 100 MB for use on a
> couple of ADSL/ISDN/ETH Firewalls.
This shouldn't be a problem at all.. If you install a core Debian, use
'advanced' setup mode then si
> > Yes, analog is ugly. However, look into the debian package 'rmagic'.
>
> I have done.
> I can't get it to work :(
> Anyone on this list got it to work with testing, 2.2.19?
Yup sure... and yes it is fiddly :/
I have a little script called 'runstats' which contans the following:
---
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:32:18PM +0100, Andreas Rabus wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i'm looking for a web-log analyzer for potato and multiple virtual hosts.
> webalizer keeps breaking (didn't create stats for some days, and then starts
> again...),
> analog is ugly, ...
Yes, analog is ugly. However, look
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 07:43:19AM -0500, Gene Grimm wrote:
> Is there any information available anywhere about configuring Qmail for
> distributed mail delivery with one Qmail system receiving as the Mail
> eXchanger and relaying selective domains to specified remote Qmail POP
> servers?
Here's m
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 07:43:19AM -0500, Gene Grimm wrote:
> Is there any information available anywhere about configuring Qmail for
> distributed mail delivery with one Qmail system receiving as the Mail
> eXchanger and relaying selective domains to specified remote Qmail POP
> servers?
Here's
> I'm looking for anyone who's used a BT (I don't seem to have an alternative
> where I live, certainly
> NTL: and telewest don't cover) broadband connection with a debian box as
> firewall and NAT who
> might give me some advice for fee.
It's a shame that BT is your only option. IMO ntl: prov
> I'm looking for anyone who's used a BT (I don't seem to have an alternative where I
>live, certainly
> NTL: and telewest don't cover) broadband connection with a debian box as firewall
>and NAT who
> might give me some advice for fee.
It's a shame that BT is your only option. IMO ntl: provi
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 06:44:02PM -0500, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
>
> MpP> For simple masshosting I still suggest mod_vhost.
>
> Which brings me back to my original question. For simple masshosting, I
> would agree. But what about a system where some vhosts have CGI or SSI
> access for exam
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 06:44:02PM -0500, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
>
> MpP> For simple masshosting I still suggest mod_vhost.
>
> Which brings me back to my original question. For simple masshosting, I
> would agree. But what about a system where some vhosts have CGI or SSI
> access for exa
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 12:30:41AM +0200, Martin 'pisi' Paljak wrote:
> Actually there is a very nice and nifty feature in apache 1.3.19+ (or was
> it 20+) that allows an include filename to be a directory what will
> include all directories and subdirs of the named direcotry,
> and load all fil
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 12:30:41AM +0200, Martin 'pisi' Paljak wrote:
> Actually there is a very nice and nifty feature in apache 1.3.19+ (or was
> it 20+) that allows an include filename to be a directory what will
> include all directories and subdirs of the named direcotry,
> and load all file
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 04:29:06PM -0500, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> And I was thinking just have a separate vhost.conf file and modifying
> that, then restarting apache with graceful.
This is exactly what I do, with the same filename vhost.conf and
everything =)
In fact
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:09:39AM +0200, Erik Tews wrote:
> Hi
> But I have not yet heard of an
> possibility which makes it possible to have really all account
> informations in a sql or ldap-database.
It's possible, I've been doing it for about a year. A set of qmail
patches that make a MySQL
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 02:16:24AM -0400, Fraser Campbell wrote:
>
> > I have about 5 dlinks i can hang with just a pingflood! I'll never buy
> > dlink nics again!
>
> We use the D-Link 530TX, it's a 4 port card based on the tulip chipset (21152
> to be exact) ... they've worked flawlessly for u
Lots of RFC links, but here's the core info you really want :)
HELO mysite
MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DATA
Hi there, this is a test message
.
QUIT
The single '.' denotes the end of the message
Regards,
Gavin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> RC> The only systematic benchmark results that have been published
> RC> are of comparing Maildir to mbox.
>
> Have a URL handy?
Just in case it's a different one than I'm aware of,
http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/
Regards,
Gavin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
> I had thought to use qmail, vpopmail, courier-imap to handle the email
> services. If there are other choices that are either easier to
> implement or offer advantages I haven't thought of, please let me
> know.
I can't comment on LDAP, but you may like to consider using MySQL in some
capacity.
> I had thought to use qmail, vpopmail, courier-imap to handle the email
> services. If there are other choices that are either easier to
> implement or offer advantages I haven't thought of, please let me
> know.
I can't comment on LDAP, but you may like to consider using MySQL in some
capacity
> My problem: The emails are being sent out at an UNBELIEVABLY SLOW rate.
>
> There must be a better way!
The answer? qmail :)
Dan Bernstein originally wrote a package designed purely to deal with huge
mailing lists.. and people loved it..
It's popularity grew.. and gradually more features crept
> My problem: The emails are being sent out at an UNBELIEVABLY SLOW rate.
>
> There must be a better way!
The answer? qmail :)
Dan Bernstein originally wrote a package designed purely to deal with huge
mailing lists.. and people loved it..
It's popularity grew.. and gradually more features crep
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Arnd Vehling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can anyone recommend a commercial or free web-based
> frontend to manage DNS-Servers?
I've seen a couple of suggestions on here.. but try 'oDNS' ... search for
it on freshmeat.net - the GUI is PHP-based, with a perl daemon to actually
do the
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Arnd Vehling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can anyone recommend a commercial or free web-based
> frontend to manage DNS-Servers?
I've seen a couple of suggestions on here.. but try 'oDNS' ... search for
it on freshmeat.net - the GUI is PHP-based, with a perl daemon to actually
do the
> had problems with many concurrent connections. I am very eager to try out
> the courier pop3 server, and the imap server also, but havent sofar
> managed to compile in MySQL support, which is necessary for us.
I have only ever managed to get courier-imap 1.1 working.. anything newer
and it fails
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Hi all,
> What can people recommend as a POP3 server that works with Maildir?
qmail :)
It ships with a POP3 server that's one of the fastest and tightest out
there :)
Indeed, you could probably get away with using just it's pop3 server and
keep your exi
> had problems with many concurrent connections. I am very eager to try out
> the courier pop3 server, and the imap server also, but havent sofar
> managed to compile in MySQL support, which is necessary for us.
I have only ever managed to get courier-imap 1.1 working.. anything newer
and it fail
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Hi all,
> What can people recommend as a POP3 server that works with Maildir?
qmail :)
It ships with a POP3 server that's one of the fastest and tightest out
there :)
Indeed, you could probably get away with using just it's pop3 server and
keep your ex
> their folders. (The large figure is an example of a smartass like me. lol)
> Preferrable all user authentication is done in MySQL or other SQL server.
> Any recommendations, ideas or so??
I use Iain Patterson's (www.iain.cx/unix/qmail)'s MySQL patches for qmail,
and I absolutely love them :) I r
> their folders. (The large figure is an example of a smartass like me. lol)
> Preferrable all user authentication is done in MySQL or other SQL server.
> Any recommendations, ideas or so??
I use Iain Patterson's (www.iain.cx/unix/qmail)'s MySQL patches for qmail,
and I absolutely love them :) I
88 matches
Mail list logo
