Hi Michael,
Supposing linux does NOT boot up properly (eg. automatic e2fsck does not
fix disk, and needs to be run manually), is it possible, using your serial
getty solution, to SEE the screen and input anything at that point? That
sounds like it might help solve lots of problems... but not if it
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can almost guarantee that you will see a performance increase. Also
> note that you don't have to change to postfix. You can configure
> sendmail to use whatever local delivery agent you want (ie. something
> like maildrop http://www.flounder.net/~mr
Hi Michael,
Supposing linux does NOT boot up properly (eg. automatic e2fsck does not
fix disk, and needs to be run manually), is it possible, using your serial
getty solution, to SEE the screen and input anything at that point? That
sounds like it might help solve lots of problems... but not if i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Friesdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Florian Friesdorf
> Sent: Sonntag, 17. Juni 2001 16:40
> To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Remote Resue Disk
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can almost guarantee that you will see a performance increase. Also
> note that you don't have to change to postfix. You can configure
> sendmail to use whatever local delivery agent you want (ie. something
> like maildrop http://www.flounder.net/~m
I mentioned "hardware solutions" in my email...
however, the cost of these hardware appliances is pretty high. In theory,
you can do the same thing with a properly configured linux server at less
than half the price. Of course... the money is in the configuration ;-)
Sincerely,
Jason
- Origi
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:02:55PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was about to develop my own "Remove Rescue Disk)... but thought maybe
> you had a better idea or had already done this...
>
> Regularly if the hard disk fails or needs a manual fsck (usually just
> pressing y throughout),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Friesdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Florian Friesdorf
> Sent: Sonntag, 17. Juni 2001 16:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Remote Resue Disk
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:02:55P
There are a number of very effect "appliance" style solutions to doing this.
Please have a look at RadWare (WSD) and F5 Networks (3DNS); I have had great
success with both companies. The bonus is that these solutions can
automaticly determine if a server is up.
Ken Seefried, CISSP
:yegon wr
It would depend on how popular the sites hosted on the servers were. If
you set a the times to be too low, say 1 minute, then every time someone
looks up the DNS records, then BLAM... your dns servers are hit because
things aren't cached anywhere.
So I would use something like an hour (we use this
we have several servers colocated with several ISP's
i am trying to sort out some configuration that would ensure good uptime for
customers
i want to place the html documents of every customer on two separate servers
connected to separate ISP's
the dns servers will point to one server and the seco
I mentioned "hardware solutions" in my email...
however, the cost of these hardware appliances is pretty high. In theory,
you can do the same thing with a properly configured linux server at less
than half the price. Of course... the money is in the configuration ;-)
Sincerely,
Jason
- Orig
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:02:55PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was about to develop my own "Remove Rescue Disk)... but thought maybe
> you had a better idea or had already done this...
>
> Regularly if the hard disk fails or needs a manual fsck (usually just
> pressing y throughout),
There are a number of very effect "appliance" style solutions to doing this.
Please have a look at RadWare (WSD) and F5 Networks (3DNS); I have had great
success with both companies. The bonus is that these solutions can
automaticly determine if a server is up.
Ken Seefried, CISSP
:yegon
It would depend on how popular the sites hosted on the servers were. If
you set a the times to be too low, say 1 minute, then every time someone
looks up the DNS records, then BLAM... your dns servers are hit because
things aren't cached anywhere.
So I would use something like an hour (we use thi
we have several servers colocated with several ISP's
i am trying to sort out some configuration that would ensure good uptime for
customers
i want to place the html documents of every customer on two separate servers
connected to separate ISP's
the dns servers will point to one server and the sec
Hi,
I am operating an server with P3 850*1, 512MB, 90GB storage. (two 45GB)
blue:~# df -H
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 2.0G 233M 1.6G 13% /
/dev/hda3 32G 2.6G 27G 9% /var
/dev/hda4 10G 646M 9.1G 7% /premium
/dev
Do they all have their own IPs within your lan? You could limit bandwidth
on a per-IP level if you want. That way, if they decide to play with
napster and stuff, they will then have to suffer with low webpage loading,
slow email, etc. That might encourage them NOT to use those types of
programs any
Hi,
I am operating an server with P3 850*1, 512MB, 90GB storage. (two 45GB)
blue:~# df -H
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 2.0G 233M 1.6G 13% /
/dev/hda3 32G 2.6G 27G 9% /var
/dev/hda4 10G 646M 9.1G 7% /pre
Do they all have their own IPs within your lan? You could limit bandwidth
on a per-IP level if you want. That way, if they decide to play with
napster and stuff, they will then have to suffer with low webpage loading,
slow email, etc. That might encourage them NOT to use those types of
programs an
Hi, is there a way to limit the bandwidth in a "per hosts" basis?
I'm actually using CBQ / SFQ to limit bandwith for two networks in an internet
link.
It's possible with the linux kernel+iptables+tc to make a packet queue with
TOS based priority?
My coleagues are eating a lot of bw with the use
21 matches
Mail list logo
