Hi everybody :)May your files never become corrupted!I've been delighted recently to receive several debconf-update auto-mails, with this type of text:On 21/09/2005, at 7:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:you are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for PROGRAM. The English template
On 9/21/05, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suggest that you subscribe to the[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailinig list.
I have already subscribed debian-in-workers mailing list and debian-i18n.
Discussing this over there may make easy to find more translatorsvolunteering.
Sure. We will
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 05:37:54PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
| Sure. We will discuss all related issues and translation process here. I am
| also looking for Gujarati contributor for sharing and review my l10n works.
I would be glad to review/test the work. If you're looking for
contributers, a
On 9/21/05, Chirag Kantharia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 05:37:54PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> | Sure. We will discuss all related issues and translation process here. I am
> | also looking for Gujarati contributor for sharing and review my l10n works.
>
> I would be gl
> Sure. We will discuss all related issues and translation process here. I am
> also looking for Gujarati contributor for sharing and review my l10n works.
Fine. All this will then happen peferrably in debian-in-workers.
As I explained, we will go through the process here in public, this
time, s
> Please check that you get both copies (list and private) and answer by
> CC'ing me as well (this time only...later, no more need for CC's to my
> address).
OK, I got Kartik's confirmation that (s)he got my mail (Kartik, sorry
for this but actually I have no real clue whether you're a man or a
w
> This is great, much more effective than watching the debconf status page, and
> I
> really appreciate the work that's gone into it.
>
> I have one suggestion, which I hope isn't a hassle: could we please have the
> new version-number included in the mail somehow?Â
>
> Otherwise, we have to gu
On 19/09/2005, at 11:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[vi]
missing vars:
${VG}
Sorry: fixed now.
However, missing the occasional variable is a fairly common error: I
gather msgfmt isn't picking these out for us during normal checks.
Can it do so? If not, how do we check for such errors?
8 matches
Mail list logo