Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-07-02 Thread Mert Dirik
Christian Perrier yazmış: > Quoting Andrei Popescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> I think the debconf templates would benefit from a similar division by >> levels as done now in d-i. Or do we already have this? > > > The debconf status pages are listing packages by popcon score, which > is a way to

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-07-02 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Andrei Popescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I think the debconf templates would benefit from a similar division by > levels as done now in d-i. Or do we already have this? The debconf status pages are listing packages by popcon score, which is a way to help in priotitizing the work. signa

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-07-02 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 09:09:46PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > Goals could be different than 100%. I think that 100% it's only a long term > goal, it's not enough. I think the debconf templates would benefit from a similar division by levels as done now in d-i. Or do we already have th

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-07-01 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 09:09:46PM +0100, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > A Tuesday 01 July 2008 05:46:43, Christian Perrier escreveu: > > Quoting Miguel Figueiredo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Can you point out what kind of structure would benefit the Debian > > > i18n/l10n effort? > > > The follo

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-07-01 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
A Tuesday 01 July 2008 05:46:43, Christian Perrier escreveu: > Quoting Miguel Figueiredo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Can you point out what kind of structure would benefit the Debian > > i18n/l10n effort? > > The following comes to my mind: > > > > - formal team (role(s) ?) > > Something I wanted to

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-07-01 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Can you point out what kind of structure would benefit the Debian i18n/l10n > effort? > The following comes to my mind: > > - formal team (role(s) ?) Something I wanted to discuss, yes. At this moment, there are de facto team "leaders" for l10n te

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-06-30 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Can you point out what kind of structure would benefit the Debian i18n/l10n effort? The following comes to my mind: - formal team (role(s) ?) - goals (short/long term) - infrastructure - policys (most important?) - guidelines Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://w

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-06-30 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:18:11AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: >Quoting Steve McIntyre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >(in -devel-announce) > > >> The i18n and l10n groups tend to be quite informally organised, but >> (with a small number of exceptions) are mostly working well. There's a >> small (and

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-06-30 Thread Christian Perrier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve McIntyre a écrit : > Apologies if I've misunderstood or misrepresented what you were > telling me. I saw some irony in what I saw as differences between your > text above and the responses from other -i18n folks, and I couldn't > resist pointing

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary (about i18n team)

2008-06-30 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Steve McIntyre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): (in -devel-announce) > The i18n and l10n groups tend to be quite informally organised, but > (with a small number of exceptions) are mostly working well. There's a > small (and funny) contradiction in the responses here: Christian > Perrier told me tha