On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 05:02:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But even that is problematic. It will most likely work for simple cases,
> where there are no conflicts and no postinstall scripts. But what to do
> about the other cases? Executing the postinstall scripts is out of the
> question
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 03:31:09AM +0100, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Sorry to butt in, but isn't this Google's problem? Should _we_ be
> worried about this? If Google's willing to give them money for working
> on GNU then good for them. Unless of course Google allocates money on
> a per project b
Sorry to butt in, but isn't this Google's problem? Should _we_ be
worried about this? If Google's willing to give them money for working
on GNU then good for them. Unless of course Google allocates money on a
per project basis, and you expect others to come forward?
I'd have thought that _our_ pro
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:36:54PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> AFAIT mbank was referring to names that distro packagers give, which
> changes for each distros. The files itself won't change, only that the
> exact package might defer. For example debian's pango package name is
> 'libpango1.0-0'
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:27:45AM +0530, CK Raju, Thrissur wrote:
> http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_goals
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here...
The way I see it, submitting a university project for GSoC does *not*
further the goals listed there -- the un
2008/3/28, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Scribit Praveen A dies 28/03/2008 hora 07:52:
>
> > Can we go down to file based dependency instead on just package name,
> > when the dependency is not satisfied?
>
>
> Then you have exactly the same issue at the file level...
No, not really.
>
>
http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_goals
CK Raju
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 7:20 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:46:21PM +0530, CK Raju wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Vikram Vincent
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > >
Scribit Praveen A dies 28/03/2008 hora 07:52:
> Can we go down to file based dependency instead on just package name,
> when the dependency is not satisfied?
Then you have exactly the same issue at the file level...
If libfoobar2 is named libbarfoo3 elsewhere, searching for libfoobar2.so
will not
2008/3/27, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:35:33PM +0530, AJISH B wrote:
> > Please find more details in the link below
> >
> > http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/hurd/running/gnu/universal_package_manager/
>
>
> In the above link, you describe how to mix .deb, .rpm, b
2008/3/28, Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:50:38 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Can you cite any reference on that? I have a hard time believing
> > this... It just seems wrong that you would get paid by GSoC for
> > something that you have to do anyways as par
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:50:38 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:46:21PM +0530, CK Raju wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Vikram Vincent
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you mean that you are *also* submitting it as your college
>> > project or that UP
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:46:21PM +0530, CK Raju wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Vikram Vincent
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you mean that you are *also* submitting it as your college
> > project or that UPM is in the course syllabus?
> Yes, And I think Google SoC cites it
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Olaf Buddenhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > We would like to participate in Google Summer code.
> [...]
> > This particular profile matches with the project (Universal Package
> > Manager) we are doing here as part of our curriculum.
>
> If it's part of
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Vikram Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Ajish,
>
> > This particular profile matches with the project (Universal Package
> > > Manager) we are doing here as part of our curriculum.
> >
> > Do you mean that you are *also* submitting it as your college project
Yes,
And I think Google SoC cites it as a *fit* case.
CK Raju
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Vikram Vincent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ajish,
>
> > > This particular profile matches with the project (Universal Package
> > > Manager) we are doing here as part of our curriculum.
> >
> >
> Do
Ajish,
> This particular profile matches with the project (Universal Package
> > Manager) we are doing here as part of our curriculum.
>
> Do you mean that you are *also* submitting it as your college project or
that UPM is in the course syllabus?
--
Vikram Vincent
+919448810822
http://www.swatan
Hi,
> We would like to participate in Google Summer code.
[...]
> This particular profile matches with the project (Universal Package
> Manager) we are doing here as part of our curriculum.
If it's part of your curriculum, you can't do it as SoC project I think.
Independent of SoC however, we wo
Hi,
> We would like to participate in Google Summer code.
[...]
> This particular profile matches with the project (Universal Package
> Manager) we are doing here as part of our curriculum.
If it's part of your curriculum, you can't do it as SoC project I think.
Independent of SoC however, we wo
Hi olafBuddenhagen,
We would like to participate in Google Summer code. We found that GNU
Hurd is a mentoring organisation and have given lot of ideas which can
be done as projects as part of Google SoC 2008.
In the list of ideas there is one profile "allow using unionfs early
at boot". Please r
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 06:11:45PM +0530, AJISH B wrote:
> I am a student of Information Technology,MES College of Engineering,
> INDIA. I have gone through the Google Summer of Code -2008. Under the
> mentor organisation "GNU Hurd" I found the profile named "allow using
> unionfs early at bo
Hi All,
I am a student of Information Technology,MES College of Engineering, INDIA.
I have gone through the Google Summer of Code -2008. Under the mentor
organisation "GNU Hurd" I found the profile named "allow using unionfs early
at boot".
We are currently undertaken our main project work on
21 matches
Mail list logo
