At Sat, 6 Sep 2003 14:59:41 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> And probably apache-ssl also?
>
> /usr/sbin/apache-perl: relocation error: /lib/libnss_compat.so.2: symbol
> __nss_lookup_function, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6
> with link time reference
Yes, I added it to post
Hi,
Jeff Griffiths, could you check this bug report with the latest glibc package?
Regards,
-- gotom
At Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:43:43 -0800,
Jeff Bailey wrote:
> 2.3.2-4 had this:
>
> - debian/patches/revert-old-libio.dpatch: back out changes causing
> problems with fseek in binaries link
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 03:05:58 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Add apache-ssl and apache-perl.
Suggested by Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. (Closes: #208997)
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 03:05:58 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Add apache-ssl and apache-perl.
Suggested by Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. (Closes: #208997)
Files:
changed:libc
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:19:09 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215764: libc6 stops XDM client connections.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:17:13 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#214349: russian PO-file translation for glibc package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:28:48 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219102: libc6: IBM JDK 1.3.1 core dumps
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:38:55 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202161: libc6: error in iconv(1) manpage
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 03:38:26 MDT 2004
Log Message:
add #202161 closes for 2.3.2.ds1-8.
Files:
changed:changelog
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231403: Bug#240605: libmikmod dependancy causes xmms not
to start on newer kernels/systems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231403: Bug#240605: libmikmod dependancy causes xmms not
to start on newer kernels/systems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
At Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:37:33 +0100,
Josep Lladonosa i Capell wrote:
> *
> intralin3:/etc/apt# apt-get install glibc-doc
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> glibc-doc is already the newest version.
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 139 not upg
Package: libc6-dbg
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Severity: wishlist
After installing this package no info is provided on how to use it.
I have seen people tempted to replace libc6 files with libc6-dbg in the
most dirtiest way by moving files with mv.
So I suggest adding some doc file to package
(/usr/sh
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:50:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:37:33 +0100,
> Josep Lladonosa i Capell wrote:
>> Setting up glibc-doc (2.3.2.ds1-11) ...
>> /var/lib/dpkg/info/glibc-doc.postinst: line 19: 7661 Segmentation fault
>> in
>> stall-info --quiet --section "GNU C
sorry, no , i don't have a debian system available.
GOTO Masanori wrote:
Hi,
Jeff Griffiths, could you check this bug report with the latest glibc package?
Regards,
-- gotom
At Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:43:43 -0800,
Jeff Bailey wrote:
2.3.2-4 had this:
- debian/patches/revert-old-libio.dpatch: back ou
Lionel,
I didn't write important information previously that I tried to
reappear this bug on my "chroot woody" environment, but it was failed.
Because I could successfully install glibc-doc on my woody.
celesta:/# dpkg -s dpkg | grep Version:
Version: 1.9.21
celesta:/# dpk
At Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:50:49 +0200,
Jose Miguel Martinez wrote:
> After installing this package no info is provided on how to use it.
> I have seen people tempted to replace libc6 files with libc6-dbg in the
> most dirtiest way by moving files with mv.
>
> So I suggest adding some doc file to pack
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:11:42 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210356: Does this bug still occur?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 13:15:31 MDT 2004
Log Message:
add #253119.
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 13:17:09 MDT 2004
Log Message:
add #252284.
Files:
changed:changelog
At Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:27:02 +0200,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On an alpha machine, I get:
>
> $ ./testatan 0.062510113344606447
> x = 0.062510113344606447(mant: 4504328370650513/2^53, exp: -3)
> atan(x) = 0.0081052752446468968 (mant: 4672373065155465/2^53, exp: -6)
>
> $ ./testatan 1.0
Hi,
At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:57:34 +0300,
Wladimir Mutel wrote:
> Perhaps we should wait for more fresh Samba 3.0.0 packed into .deb
> Samba 3.0.0 rc1 was released recently, and its changelog, in part,
> reads :
>
> 3) Check for broken getgrouplist() in glibc.
>
> So
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:29:28 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247118: libc6-dev: Definition of kill() missing when using
-D_BSD_SOURCE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:59:50 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Bug other/6903] gcc could give better error message when /tmp
gets full
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 18:04:44 MDT 2004
Log Message:
add #222953.
Files:
changed:changelog
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:32:50 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156697: libc6: posix_memalign() uses its arguments
incorrectly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:52:27 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line int64_t: "long long int" or "long int", which one is it?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 142379 woody
Bug#142379: libc6: Time zone information for Mexico not correct
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 16 woody
Bug#16: glibc-doc: return type of cfmakeraw is void, not int
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:07 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line missing contribution to the copyright file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:13:00 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165896: glibc: errors applying makeconfig and locale-es_AR
patches
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
At Sat, 6 Sep 2003 14:59:41 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> And probably apache-ssl also?
>
> /usr/sbin/apache-perl: relocation error: /lib/libnss_compat.so.2: symbol
> __nss_lookup_function, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link
> time reference
Yes, I added it to post
Hi,
Jeff Griffiths, could you check this bug report with the latest glibc package?
Regards,
-- gotom
At Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:43:43 -0800,
Jeff Bailey wrote:
> 2.3.2-4 had this:
>
> - debian/patches/revert-old-libio.dpatch: back out changes causing
> problems with fseek in binaries link
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 03:05:58 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Add apache-ssl and apache-perl.
Suggested by Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. (Closes: #208997)
Files:
changed:changelog
--
T
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 03:05:58 MDT 2004
Log Message:
- debian/debhelper.in/libc.postinst: Add apache-ssl and apache-perl.
Suggested by Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. (Closes: #208997)
Files:
changed:libc
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:19:09 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215764: libc6 stops XDM client connections.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:17:13 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#214349: russian PO-file translation for glibc package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:38:55 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202161: libc6: error in iconv(1) manpage
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 03:38:26 MDT 2004
Log Message:
add #202161 closes for 2.3.2.ds1-8.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231403: Bug#240605: libmikmod dependancy causes xmms not to start
on newer kernels/systems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:58:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231403: Bug#240605: libmikmod dependancy causes xmms not to start
on newer kernels/systems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
At Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:37:33 +0100,
Josep Lladonosa i Capell wrote:
> *
> intralin3:/etc/apt# apt-get install glibc-doc
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> glibc-doc is already the newest version.
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 139 not upg
Package: libc6-dbg
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13
Severity: wishlist
After installing this package no info is provided on how to use it.
I have seen people tempted to replace libc6 files with libc6-dbg in the
most dirtiest way by moving files with mv.
So I suggest adding some doc file to package (/usr/sha
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:50:10PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:37:33 +0100,
> Josep Lladonosa i Capell wrote:
>> Setting up glibc-doc (2.3.2.ds1-11) ...
>> /var/lib/dpkg/info/glibc-doc.postinst: line 19: 7661 Segmentation fault
>> in
>> stall-info --quiet --section "GNU C
sorry, no , i don't have a debian system available.
GOTO Masanori wrote:
Hi,
Jeff Griffiths, could you check this bug report with the latest glibc package?
Regards,
-- gotom
At Sun, 14 Dec 2003 07:43:43 -0800,
Jeff Bailey wrote:
2.3.2-4 had this:
- debian/patches/revert-old-libio.dpatch: back ou
Lionel,
I didn't write important information previously that I tried to
reappear this bug on my "chroot woody" environment, but it was failed.
Because I could successfully install glibc-doc on my woody.
celesta:/# dpkg -s dpkg | grep Version:
Version: 1.9.21
celesta:/# dpk
At Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:50:49 +0200,
Jose Miguel Martinez wrote:
> After installing this package no info is provided on how to use it.
> I have seen people tempted to replace libc6 files with libc6-dbg in the
> most dirtiest way by moving files with mv.
>
> So I suggest adding some doc file to pack
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:11:42 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210356: Does this bug still occur?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 13:15:31 MDT 2004
Log Message:
add #253119.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 13:17:09 MDT 2004
Log Message:
add #252284.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:29:28 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247118: libc6-dev: Definition of kill() missing when using
-D_BSD_SOURCE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
At Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:27:02 +0200,
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On an alpha machine, I get:
>
> $ ./testatan 0.062510113344606447
> x = 0.062510113344606447(mant: 4504328370650513/2^53, exp: -3)
> atan(x) = 0.0081052752446468968 (mant: 4672373065155465/2^53, exp: -6)
>
> $ ./testatan 1.0
Hi,
At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:57:34 +0300,
Wladimir Mutel wrote:
> Perhaps we should wait for more fresh Samba 3.0.0 packed into .deb
> Samba 3.0.0 rc1 was released recently, and its changelog, in part,
> reads :
>
> 3) Check for broken getgrouplist() in glibc.
>
> So
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:59:50 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Bug other/6903] gcc could give better error message when /tmp gets
full
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Repository: glibc-package/debian
who:gotom
time: Tue Jun 29 18:04:44 MDT 2004
Log Message:
add #222953.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:32:50 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156697: libc6: posix_memalign() uses its arguments incorrectly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:52:27 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line int64_t: "long long int" or "long int", which one is it?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 142379 woody
Bug#142379: libc6: Time zone information for Mexico not correct
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 16 woody
Bug#16: glibc-doc: return type of cfmakeraw is void, not int
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:07 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line missing contribution to the copyright file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:13:00 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165896: glibc: errors applying makeconfig and locale-es_AR patches
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
61 matches
Mail list logo
