lead status update

Click here to unsubscribe or update your email address. http://go.rm0001.net/r.asp?l=185303&ee=512;debi&s=784651 Over the past 6 months we have launched a new 60 agent call center facility dedicated compliant predictive live transfer debt settlement and debt consolidation leads. Every lead is

Re: Status Wizards of OS

Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, and we'll probaly have some merchandising stuff, too. Depends on > how much we loose^w give away^w^w sell in Essen ;) I will at least take all stuff which we did not sell from Essen to Berlin. Someone needs to catch it from Ina's (my wife) pla

Re: Status Wizards of OS

-- Martin Zobel-Helas GPG Key-ID:0x5d64f870 Debian DevelopereMail Privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Stable Release Manager eMail Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Status Wizards of OS

Hi! Uff... just a week left till Wizards of OS... and I'm sorry to tell you, that I didn't had time to do much planing so far for personal reasons :( So far the situation is as follows: a) We have a booth b) We have enough people to man-staff it c) Meike and I still need accomodation (Anyone

Re: [Cebit] current status -> LinuxPark URL

* Joerg Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050310 13:15]: > [..] Am Projekt sind über 100 Personen beteiligt, die das System nach > > strengen, selbst aufgestellten Richtlinien zusammenstellen. [..] > === > Shouldn't this be "1000" ? Yes, it should. Actually I noti

Re: [Cebit] current status -> LinuxPark URL

* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050310 12:26]: > > Hall 6 Booth H 18, Block 402. It's in the LinuxPark, > > try to look for yellow thingies on the top of the boothes. > yellow thingies? Don't know how to describe it better: There are small, yellow glowing pillars on the the top of the boothes

Re: [Cebit] current status -> LinuxPark URL

* Joerg Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-10 16:03]: > http://www.linux-events.de/LinuxPark/cebit05/OpenBooth/openbooth.html: > > == > Das Debian-Projekt stellt die umfangreichste Linux-Distribution unter > dem Namen Debian GNU/Linux zusammen, die bisher gleichzeitig für mehr > als ein Dut

Re: [Cebit] current status -> LinuxPark URL

Sven Guckes schrieb am Donnerstag, 10. März 2005 um 12:26:12 +0100: > http://www.linux-events.de/LinuxPark/cebit05/LinuxForum/vortraege.html Btw. I surfed a little on these pages and found at http://www.linux-events.de/LinuxPark/cebit05/OpenBooth/openbooth.html: == Debian Das Debian-Projekt

Re: [Cebit] current status -> LinuxPark URL

* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-10 00:43]: > * Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050310 00:01]: > > >9 squaremeter, H / 402. Joey, could you please > > >add the Block to the entry on the events-page? > > In which hall is this? > > Hall 6 Booth H 18, Block 402. It's in the LinuxPa

Re: [Cebit] current status

* Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050310 00:01]: > >9 squaremeter, H / 402. Joey, could you please add the Block to the > >entry on the events-page? > In which hall is this? Hall 6 Booth H 18, Block 402. It's in the LinuxPark, try to look for yellow thingies on the top of the boothes. > I c

Re: [Cebit] current status

On 26 Feb 2005, at 06:58, Alexander Schmehl wrote: 9 squaremeter, H / 402. Joey, could you please add the Block to the entry on the events-page? In which hall is this? I cannot find Debian using the search function on the CeBIT homepage[1]. Regards, Philipp Kern Debian Developer [1] http://www.c

Re: [Cebit] current status

Hi! Just a smal update: * Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050221 19:58]: > 1. Booth: > Size: Unknown. > Position: Unknown. 9 squaremeter, H / 402. Joey, could you please add the Block to the entry on the events-page? > 2. DVDs > Number: Known. > Sponsored: Partly

Re: [Cebit] current status

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 10207 March 1977, Alexander Schmehl wrote: 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Alexander Schmehl: x x x x x x x x Jörg Jaspert x x x x x x x Thomas Lange: x x Andr

Re: [Cebit] current status

On 10207 March 1977, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. > Alexander Schmehl: x x x x x x x x > Jörg Jaspert x x x x x x x > Thomas Lange: x x > Andreas Tille: ? x

Re: [Cebit] current status

* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050222 21:27]: > > > Okay. To be more specific: In case of a the Release of Debian > > > GNU/Linux 3.1 "Sarge" as stable, there will be a booth party on the > > > Debian-Booth: > > > Guests can bring their own food, Ganneff will to a gogo-dance showing > > >

Re: [Cebit] current status

* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050222 18:03]: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > > > 4. Volunteers: > > 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. > > Alexander Schmehl: x x x x x x x x > > Jörg Jasper x x x x x x x > > Thomas La

Re: [Cebit] current status

* Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050222 21:24]: > Sometimes you simply need to be killed. :) Nice timing you have. Currently I would like to say the same to you :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Cebit] current status

* Joerg Jaspert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050222 21:25]: > On 10208 March 1977, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > > Okay. To be more specific: In case of a the Release of Debian > > GNU/Linux 3.1 "Sarge" as stable, there will be a booth party on the > > Debian-Booth: > > Guests can bring their own food, Gan

Re: [Cebit] current status

On 10208 March 1977, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Okay. To be more specific: In case of a the Release of Debian > GNU/Linux 3.1 "Sarge" as stable, there will be a booth party on the > Debian-Booth: > Guests can bring their own food, Ganneff will to a gogo-dance showing > his beautifull legs, and I

Re: [Cebit] current status

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:49:29 +0100 Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050222 07:51]: > > > >But as I said: I don't know. So please ask. > > Any hint WHERE or WHO to ask? > > Either info (at) linux-events.de or rschuster (at) linuxnewmedia.de > d

Re: [Cebit] current status

* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050222 07:51]: > >But as I said: I don't know. So please ask. > Any hint WHERE or WHO to ask? Either info (at) linux-events.de or rschuster (at) linuxnewmedia.de directly. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: [Cebit] current status

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Alexander Schmehl wrote: I don't know, I'm not a speaker myself. But it might be possible, that LinuxPark organizers to something like "card sharing" to minimize costs, so it could be possible that you can only enter on one day. But as I said: I don't know. So please ask. An

Re: [Cebit] current status

* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050221 22:44]: > >Thomas, Andreas: You are doint talks, will you get your own passes? > Well, I was hoping to get a pass if I do a talk. Do I have to > ask for it explicitely? I don't know, I'm not a speaker myself. But it might be possible, that LinuxPark

Re: [Cebit] current status

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Alexander Schmehl wrote: 4. Volunteers: 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Alexander Schmehl: x x x x x x x x Jörg Jasper x x x x x x x Thomas Lange: x x Andreas Tille: ? x ?

[Cebit] current status

Hi! Current Status: SNAFU. 1. Booth: Size: Unknown. Position: Unknown. I asked several times for size and position. Additional confussion was caused by a mail from the LinuxPark organizers, stating that we will have "a Demo-Point with stool, perhaps with InterNet a

Re: Status

Yor message contained a virus debian-events-eu@lists.debian.org wrote: The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment. Trend Micro POP3 Mail Scan detected a virus and delet

can somebody set our booth status?

Hi, Daniel Kasten and me (Hauke Goos-Habermann) will stay the whole LinuxTag event, so we will be available the whole time as staff for the Debian booth. Can somebody set the booth cross after our names? Thanks

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi all, ok the final image is on the way to the mirror, the deadline is over, the golden master is burned and (hopefully) well tested and "Ich habe fertig!" I hope that we've produced something working and usefull for the visitors and all others who might use the Image for Debian installations. Y

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:09:53PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:28:33AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Hi, > > > > All the Links to http://luonnotar.infodrom.org/~joey/LT/2003/ > > > are dead. Looks like you converte

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:09:53PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:28:33AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Hi, > > All the Links to http://luonnotar.infodrom.org/~joey/LT/2003/ > > are dead. Looks like you convertet from 2002 to 2003 without copying

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> files. The GPL link for example could be a direct link to one of > >> the GNU pages. > >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html > > I was about to use that, but since there was a local one already, > > I had hoped that the gpl

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> files. The GPL link for example could be a direct link to one of >> the GNU pages. >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html > I was about to use that, but since there was a local one already, > I had hoped that the gpl was stored locally. Last year it

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:28:33AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Hi Joey, > > > Could people please proofread > > which will > > be put on the CD as well. Ignore the broken images for the moment, > > they'll be fi

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

* Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030618 10:21]: > > I would suggest two packages: dahb-pdf and/or dahb-html avaible via: > > deb http://www.openoffice.de/debian/ stable main > The latest pdf version is already included in books/dahb.pdf :) Oh, okay. cu Alexander pgpoI58AijvAp.pgp Descripti

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:27:31AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > * Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030601 11:53]: > > > Ok so I think that's all for the moment. Please download the image, give it > > a try and then give me feedback! > Tested it on two machines and it worked very well (but it

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

* Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030601 11:53]: > Ok so I think that's all for the moment. Please download the image, give it > a try and then give me feedback! Tested it on two machines and it worked very well (but it took me quite some time to find out, that the eepro100 module was compiled i

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:28:33AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Hi Joey, > Could people please proofread > which will > be put on the CD as well. Ignore the broken images for the moment, > they'll be fixed later. > > The text and externa

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, v9 is uploaded and ready for testing. It's the first 700MB Image so you've to search for a 700MB CD-RW first. Important changes: == - OpenOffice.org 1.0.3 is included (thanks to Rene and Michael for the help) - We've now working localisation during the Installation (thanks to

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

> I'm now out to drink a fresh, cool Koelsch > http://wrack.telelev.net/~sven/albums/misc/Bild2785.sized.jpg Great. Could people please proofread which will be put on the CD as well. Ignore the broken images for the moment, they'll be fix

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:02:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, > Hmm. I don't remember. IIRC someone talked about apt-get.org so I was sure > he has the right one. My memory may strike me, though > > I just caught him on IRC; his source was right but somehow > something/-one got confused. J

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 04:41:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > use 0woody2. Thats the backport ^ That's actually 1... > Did you say where that backport was? I couldn't find that information > browsing this thread casually. Hmm. I don't

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 05:05:54PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 04:41:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > use 0woody2. Thats the backport > > Did you say where that backport was? I couldn't find that information > browsing this thread casually. http://ftp.freenet.de/

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 04:41:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > use 0woody2. Thats the backport Did you say where that backport was? I couldn't find that information browsing this thread casually. cheers, Michael

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > I've taken a look at the OOo stuff last night. > The following packages fit on a 700MB version of the image > (from the vpnjunkies archiv) >

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

* Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030615 13:49]: > > http://download.linuxtag.org/knoppix/packages-dvd.txt > I cannot acces that file due to connection timeouts, but anyway, isn't > it about Knoppix instead of our CD? Yes, that the is the package list of the LinuxTag Knoppix DVD, not the one o

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 12:33:08PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > The bunk package looks a little bit better > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ dpkg -I openoffice.org-bin_1.0.3-1.bunk_i386.deb > Architecture: i386 > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), libfreetype6 (<< 2.1.0), libgcc1 (>= > 1:3.2.2-0.bunk), libstd

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:24:34PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 05:16:26PM +0200, Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hej Michael, > > > Could you please tell me where to find the actual list of installed > > packages? I seem to have lost the link. > > h

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 07:35:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Could you please tell me where to find the actual list of installed > > packages? I seem to have lost the link. > http://source.rfc822.org/pub/mirror/lt2003/1_NONUS.packages_v8 I don't think we need to have so many dictionaries in

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, ok I've to reply to myself here, hope it's a good point to add further information. > > counting all "main" packages (src: openoffice.org / > > openoffice.org-debian

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 07:35:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > > I'll give it a try and if it works and makes sense fine if not I'll > > > through the plan away. 75MB out auf 650MB is quite a lot. > > > > Any news on 700MB? > I haven't heart something from Grisu so I hope it's ok. Actualy I or

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 05:16:26PM +0200, Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hej Michael, > Could you please tell me where to find the actual list of installed > packages? I seem to have lost the link. http://download.linuxtag.org/knoppix/packages-dvd.txt hth, Daniel -- (___) Danie

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 05:16:26PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi Michael, > > Please if you would like to have it in take the package list from the > > CD suggest what I should remove and suggest what I should add. > > Could you p

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > Please if you would like to have it in take the package list from the > CD suggest what I should remove and suggest what I should add. Could you please tell me where to find the actual list of installed packages? I seem to have lost t

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

#include * Martin Schulze [Tue, Jun 10 2003, 07:42:47AM]: > Acrobat should not be included. xpdf should be fine, though. Here we disagree, xpdf is not always fine. However, Acroread must not be included when we add anything writting PDF files to the media (say, Ghostscript). MfG, Eduard. --

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:04:33AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Stefan Gybas wrote: > > > Here is my list: > > > > > > # Blackdown JDK > > > deb ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/languages/java/linux/debian woody main non-free > >

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:46:29PM +0200, Christian Weerts wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, sorry full quote so that Grisu can follow. > > > counting all "main" packages (src: openoffice.org / > > > openoffice.org-debian-file): ~

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:36:33PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:46:29PM +0200, Christian Weerts wrote: > > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > sorry full quote so that Grisu can follow. > > > > > counting a

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > counting all "main" packages (src: openoffice.org / > > openoffice.org-debian-file): ~ 75 MB. > > > > (we can remove some -l10n-* things if that would be necessary [1], we > > should include -en, -de and

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:42:28PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: Hi, > You may mention it in the sources.list, but AFAIK you are not allowed > to ship acrobat reader in a bundle with software, wich can create pdf > files. > > non-free is non-free is evil. Ok I decided to not included it so tha

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi, > > > counting all "main" packages (src: openoffice.org / > > openoffice.org-debian-file): ~ 75 MB. > > > > (we can remove some -l10n-* things if that would be necessary [1], we > > should include -en,

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

* Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030609 20:31]: > What do you think about Christian Marillats packages? He includes acrobat > reader wich might be usefull but is non-free and on the other side we > include a recent version of xpdf. You may mention it in the sources.list, but AFAIK you are not

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Am Montag, 09.06.03 um 20:31 Uhr schrieb Sven Hoexter: non-free is evil :) On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:04:33AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Stefan Gybas wrote: Here is my list: # Blackdown JDK deb ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/languages/java/linux/debian woody main non-free

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:04:33AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Stefan Gybas wrote: > > Here is my list: > > > > # Blackdown JDK > > deb ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/languages/java/linux/debian woody main non-free > > > I beli

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, > counting all "main" packages (src: openoffice.org / > openoffice.org-debian-file): ~ 75 MB. > > (we can remove some -l10n-* things if that would be necessary [1], we > should include -en, -de and the European, though).. > > I

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:40:53PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > > Does that mean there will be no openoffice on the CD? > > Yes, IMHO it would be usefull to have it on the CD but killing KDE or > > GNOME or other big things would not improve the usability. > > Of cou

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Stefan Gybas wrote: > > One of the requirements for additional packages for the Knoppix > >DVD is that the software needs to be free. It would be real ashaming > >if the Knoppix DVD would only contain free software and the Debian CD > >made of the Debian Team would contain non-free software. > >

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:40:53PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Does that mean there will be no openoffice on the CD? > Yes, IMHO it would be usefull to have it on the CD but killing KDE or > GNOME or other big things would not improve the usability. Of course we must not remove KDE/GNOME/XFREE.

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:09:19AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 09:09:41PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Aehm openoffice is not included in woody so there is no older version on > > the CD yet and I don't plan to include one cause I would have to skip > > a lot other stuf

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Stefan Gybas wrote: > Martin Schulze wrote: > > >># Blackdown JDK > >I believe we should only distribute software which is considerably > >free. > > Ok, that's fine with me. I just posted my additional entries from > /etc/apt/sources.list. However, it would be nice if I didn't get 3 mails > per

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Martin Schulze wrote: # Blackdown JDK I believe we should only distribute software which is considerably free. Ok, that's fine with me. I just posted my additional entries from /etc/apt/sources.list. However, it would be nice if I didn't get 3 mails per week from people asking me how they can ful

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 09:09:41PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > Aehm openoffice is not included in woody so there is no older version on > the CD yet and I don't plan to include one cause I would have to skip > a lot other stuff to include it. > > I'll include the sources.list entry in the list so

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Sven Hoexter wrote: > > # Blackdown JDK > > deb ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/languages/java/linux/debian woody main non-free > Well this is not real open source software and it's quite far away from being > compatible with the DFSG. > > Should we include sources with non-free packages? IMO we should not d

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Stefan Gybas wrote: > Here is my list: > > # Blackdown JDK > deb ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/languages/java/linux/debian woody main non-free I believe we should only distribute software which is considerably free. One of the r

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

* Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030609 01:20]: > > # Blackdown JDK [..] > Should we include sources with non-free packages? IMO we should not do it but > I would like to here some other comments on this issue. No. Mention www.apt-get.org, but please don't add apt-sources for nonfree Software.

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:20:42AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > Should we include sources with non-free packages? I'd say no. We are only talking about documenting them in /etc/apt/sources.list though, right? Otherwise, it woul be clear 'Never' of course. Michael -- > gibt es eigentlich einen

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 04:32:07PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi Stefan, hi *, thanks for the list. I'll include the entrys for Gnome and KDE. Apache 2.x and subversion is not very interessting for new users so I'll skipp the entry. > >As always please give me feedback and

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:21:17PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > ah and btw, I would include the upcoming backport of 1.0.3-3 which is > > ^ > >

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:21:17PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi again, > > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > ah and btw, I would include the upcoming backport of 1.0.3-3 which is > ^ > if it is ready a

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi again, Rene Engelhard wrote: > ah and btw, I would include the upcoming backport of 1.0.3-3 which is ^ if it is ready at the time the CD is to be pressed

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Stefan Gybas wrote: > > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > > > >As always please give me feedback and I'm still waiting that > > >somebody sends me a list of nice apt-get able backport archives > > >wich work without major problems for inclusion in our list. > > > > # OpenOffice

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, Stefan Gybas wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > >As always please give me feedback and I'm still waiting that > >somebody sends me a list of nice apt-get able backport archives > >wich work without major problems for inclusion in our list. > > # OpenOffice.org > deb http://ftp.freenet.de/pub/f

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Sven Hoexter wrote: As always please give me feedback and I'm still waiting that somebody sends me a list of nice apt-get able backport archives wich work without major problems for inclusion in our list. Here is my list: # Blackdown JDK deb ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/languages/java/linux/debian woody m

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:03:42PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > Am Fre, 2003-06-06 um 07.26 schrieb Josef Spillner: > > Hi, > > > > > I have asked around and quite a few games people are interested in a > > > > discussion about the topic, a

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:03:42PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Am Fre, 2003-06-06 um 07.26 schrieb Josef Spillner: Hi, > > > I have asked around and quite a few games people are interested in a > > > discussion about the topic, about 45 or 90 minutes. > > > Would t

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, ok I've just uploaded v8 We've now a new build of the bfs with several sec patches for the Linux Kernel. I've installed this image only on my test machine at home so there might be bugs. If you find one or more please report. ATM I only know that the bfs report at the end of the base-system ab

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

* Josef Spillner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030606 07:26]: > I have asked around and quite a few games people are interested in a > discussion about the topic, about 45 or 90 minutes. > Would this be appropriate for a workshop slot? > (Using "Freie Spiel- und Lernsoftware und der Jugendschutz" or a sim

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Am Fre, 2003-06-06 um 07.26 schrieb Josef Spillner: > > I have asked around and quite a few games people are interested in a > > discussion about the topic, about 45 or 90 minutes. > > Would this be appropriate for a workshop slot? > > (Using "Freie Spiel- und Le

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, Am Fre, 2003-06-06 um 07.26 schrieb Josef Spillner: > I have asked around and quite a few games people are interested in a > discussion about the topic, about 45 or 90 minutes. > Would this be appropriate for a workshop slot? > (Using "Freie Spiel- und Lernsoftware und der Jugendschutz" or a

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Hi, On Friday 06 June 2003 02:32, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Well... In those days I'm not that sure. Somebody might see a > difference between a OS containing 5 (?) small games, and a OS, > containing over 300 games (anybody counted them? greping to the > Package-File counts 430 packages). There

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

* Nicolas Kratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030606 01:41]: > > So, tell me, where is (at this poin) the difference between Windows and > > any other Linux distribution? > Nowhere. I read this as a normal (read: bend- and stretchable in all > desired directions) politicians statement. It speaks in our fav

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 10:49:22PM +0200, Christian Weerts wrote: > Have you ever read the FAQ on www.usk.de? Here is a little > snapshot (ony in German - sorry): > 6. Frage: > Sind nach dieser Abgrenzung Produkte wie Windows, die neben einem > Betriebssystem auch Spiele enthalten, kennzeichnung

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Michael Bramer wrote: > > Again a few words on the "Jugendsch(m)utzgesetz" > > I decided that all "games and eductional software" will stay so I'm feeling > > sorry for all underaged people. Please take your parents with you so that > > they > > can grab a CD for you at the exhibition. > > Ok, I

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Michael Bramer wrote: > > > But we need some sponsors! Can someone phone the old sponsors and ask if > > > they will support us this time again? I don't have really time for this. > > Christian has offered some help with this but he would like to have the > > contact persons and telefon numbers. >

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

[Eduard Bloch] > Did anyonene try to replace base-config with the Sid version in a > Woody basedebs chain? Does it work? If no, would it be possible to > extract the i18n changes and apply them to the Woody version? Skolelinux uses a backported version. It is available from this source: deb ft

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

Moin Petter! Petter Reinholdtsen schrieb am Thursday, den 05. June 2003: > base-config on the other hand is fixed to handle translations, so this > part of the problem is fixed (is Sarge and Sid, not Wood). Did anyonene try to replace base-config with the Sid version in a Woody basedebs chain? Do

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Re: status update LT 2003 CD]

- Forwarded message from Marcus Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: "Marcus Moeller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Eduard Bloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Michael Bramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Re: status update LT 2003 CD Date: Thu,

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: status update LT 2003 CD]

- Forwarded message from Marcus Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: "Marcus Moeller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Petter Reinholdtsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Michael Bramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Eduard Bloch" <[EMAIL PROT

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: status update LT 2003 CD]

- Forwarded message from Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:02:13 +0200 From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Marcus Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Michael Bramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: status update LT 2003 CD Moin Marcus

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:02:13PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Moin Marcus! > Marcus Moeller schrieb am Thursday, den 05. June 2003: bitte auch an die Liste antworten. I forward all mails also to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't make the LT-CD myself. Please send all mails also to the ML. Gruss Grisu

Re: status update LT 2003 CD

[Eduard Bloch] > Pere? I've since moved on to the new installer, and concentrate my effort there to make sure it's translation support is ok. I am sure my patches for b-f are floating around somewhere. I leave the tracking of the patches to someone with interest in this area. I do no longer re

  1   2   >