On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:03:42PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Am Fre, 2003-06-06 um 07.26 schrieb Josef Spillner:
Hi, > > > I have asked around and quite a few games people are interested in a > > > discussion about the topic, about 45 or 90 minutes. > > > Would this be appropriate for a workshop slot? > > > (Using "Freie Spiel- und Lernsoftware und der Jugendschutz" or a similar > > > topic.) > > Well, if it should be a discussion, you should find someone that is pro > > the new Jugendschutzgesetz, or the whole discussion will not be too > > interesting. But I have no idea where to find such a person :-) > > In general I like the idea. I don't like it. IMHO those "regulations" or "protections" are nothing more then censorship with a bright shiny looking. It's at the parents to protect there children and if the children are able to circumvent the protection they should have the right to do/look what they want. If they decide that they want to look this brand new action-murder-blood-splatter movie they should. Ok that's my own opinion and I guess that's quite off topic here. Please, if you feel that you need to comment on it write a pm. > You should try to find somebody from the FSK/USK > to attend and/or some politician (see the last but 1-3 c't magazines that > listed some). A panel discussion does only make sense if both sides are > represented (pro and contra). Well having people from the USK there in a discussion would be nice but I guess that they don't know very much about OpenSource so this might be a chance to open the mind of a few persons bevor we go into a discussion without a base. As long as they don't understand what opensource is and where excatly our problem is the discussion would be worthless. Sven -- It really sucks to give your heart to a girl You want to know her like she knows the whole world But 10 seconds in, it's obvious, your going nowhere... [Bowling for Soup - Drunk Enough To Dance - I Don't Wanna Rock]