http://bugs.skolelinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1013
Andreas B. Mundt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
Hi,
On Sonntag, 13. Februar 2011, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> It is technically not very hard. It would involve asking a debconf
> question before pkgsel is running in d-i, and setting the
> tasksel/desktop debconf value. This is the same operation that is
> done based on the desktop=kde/gnome
Hi,
during the Debian Edu meeting here in Zweibrücken we discussed #602863 and how
to solve it. I've asked about 15 people what they'd think about us previously
using bind9 (until and including etch), then moving to powerdns (in lenny)
and then switching back to bind9 in squeeze. Everybody exce
[Holger Levsen]
> Thats what we thought at first too. Sadly powerdns and bind9 also
> need different values (!) for the cNAMERecord attribute...
Your comment was about kde vs. gnome, right? That was what I was
answering.
The rest of your comment now seem to be about powerdns vs. bind, which
was
Accepted:
education-astronomy_0.852~svn72937_amd64.deb
to pool/local/d/debian-edu/education-astronomy_0.852~svn72937_amd64.deb
education-chemistry_0.852~svn72937_amd64.deb
to pool/local/d/debian-edu/education-chemistry_0.852~svn72937_amd64.deb
education-common_0.852~svn72937_amd64.deb
to poo
Hi,
On Sonntag, 13. Februar 2011, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Your comment was about kde vs. gnome, right?
no.
> LDAP, while bind give us delayed updates. I would very much like to
> have LDAP changes take effect imedidately in DNS.
If you (or anybody else) needs undelayed updates, get a ro
http://bugs.skolelinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1379
Klaus Ade Johnstad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kl...@skolelinux.no
--- Comment #1
Hi,
during the meeting in Zweibrücken we also discussed the need to be able to
manage netgroups with gosa and thankfully Mike volunteered to work on this.
Yay!
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
package: debian-edu-config
severity: wishlist
Hi,
to ease maintainance (no more adding of workstations to be able to access home
shares) and to improve security, it would be desirable to use kerberized nfs4
mounting.
This bug is for tracking this issue, ie by documenting the needed steps.
It
Hi,
does anybody already have experiences with running full classrooms of thin
clients with kde4?
Klaus Ade believes its not feasable to do this (even on very powerful server
hardware), as the UI feels very slow once multiple users are working with it.
But Klaus Ade only tested it and this d
http://bugs.skolelinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1379
Holger Levsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
Package: debian-edu-config
Version: 1.446~svn72930
Severity: minor
Tags: squeeze
For integration of Kerberos5 libpam-krb5 needs to be tweaked in
a way that it will only apply krb5 pam rules to uidNumbers greater than
1 (presuming that LDAP users on the Tjener start with 1).
The current
Hi,
during the Debian Edu meeting in Zweibrücken in Rheinland-Pfalz we obviously
also talked about the upcoming Debian Edu Squeeze release. The consenus was,
that it should happen rather soon. No new features should be added anymore,
instead we should try to release in March or April (2011).
I
El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 12:45 +0100, Holger Levsen escribió:
> Hi,
>
> during the Debian Edu meeting here in Zweibrücken we discussed #602863 and
> how
> to solve it. I've asked about 15 people what they'd think about us previously
> using bind9 (until and including etch), then moving to power
[José L. Redrejo Rodríguez]
> Obviously, you're free to do it. From my point of view, these are
> not good news. In the future, in our schools we're not going to
> switch back to use bind9 and will keep the current setup with pdns.
> Having all the infraestructure and information stored in ldap is
El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 17:09 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen escribió:
> [José L. Redrejo Rodríguez]
> > Obviously, you're free to do it. From my point of view, these are
> > not good news. In the future, in our schools we're not going to
> > switch back to use bind9 and will keep the current setup w
[Mike Gabriel]
> For integration of Kerberos5 libpam-krb5 needs to be tweaked in a
> way that it will only apply krb5 pam rules to uidNumbers greater
> than 1 (presuming that LDAP users on the Tjener start with
> 1).
Why? UIDs >= 1000 are supposed to be in LDAP, while the range from
500 t
? UIDs >= 1000 are supposed to be in LDAP, while the range from
500 to 1000 are supposed to be local users. So for me, the current
default in libpapm-krb5 seem correct.
My DebianEdu squeeze (which was a DVD snapshot install from today -
20110213) adds local users starting with uidNumber=1
[Mike Gabriel]
> My DebianEdu squeeze (which was a DVD snapshot install from today -
> 20110213) adds local users starting with uidNumber=1000.
>
> Thus, user creation in LDAP and in /etc/passwd start off with the
> same uidNumber. I recommend setting the first LDAP uidNumber to a
Hi Petter,
On So 13 Feb 2011 19:47:21 CET Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Mike Gabriel]
My DebianEdu squeeze (which was a DVD snapshot install from today -
20110213) adds local users starting with uidNumber=1000.
Thus, user creation in LDAP and in /etc/passwd start off with the
same uidNumber. I
[Mike Gabriel]
> Wrong is a matter of context here.
Well, I would claim it is more a question of expectations. You seem
to expect something not guaranteed by adduser.
> I just use the Debian defaults and they uidNumbers>=1000 for
> /etc/passwd... Skolelinux-LDAP should not conflict with the Debi
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 04:17:44PM +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
Our servers still remain in lenny and our plans to move to squeeze (or
wheeze) include the development of a lwat replacement. We need to
develop it to fit our needs as we have to create accounts massively
every beginning
Hi Petter,
On So 13 Feb 2011 20:16:39 CET Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
As far as I can tell, it isn't in conflict, and everything is working
as documented. The 500-1000 range is for local users, while 1000-> is
for global users. For Skolelinux, these users are in LDAP, and
adduser should not be
Hi,
On 02/13/2011 04:17 PM, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
[...]
> #602863 is not important for us. Our servers still remain in lenny and
> our plans to move to squeeze (or wheeze) include the development of a
> lwat replacement. We need to develop it to fit our needs as we have to
> create acc
Hi,
On Sonntag, 13. Februar 2011, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> Having all the infraestructure and information stored in ldap is very
> safe when you have several thousands of ltsp servers and don't want to
> manually modify configuration files whenever a new server is placed or
> moved. More
25 matches
Mail list logo
