El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 17:09 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen escribió: > [José L. Redrejo Rodríguez] > > Obviously, you're free to do it. From my point of view, these are > > not good news. In the future, in our schools we're not going to > > switch back to use bind9 and will keep the current setup with pdns. > > Having all the infraestructure and information stored in ldap is > > very safe when you have several thousands of ltsp servers and don't > > want to manually modify configuration files whenever a new server is > > placed or moved. More things are in ldap, less things we have to > > touch. > > Note that DNS info will still be in LDAP, also with bind9. But the > LDAP schema used is differet with bind9 than with powerdns. The LDAP > info is transfered to bind9 config files using the ldap2zone package. >
Sorry I haven't had time enouth to even take a look to these changes. Will ldap2zone remove previous zones in a bind configuration. I.E. not installing a new server, but moving it from a classroom to another or from a school to another, will it remove previous configs and create new ones? Anyway, at the end of it, I don't see any benefit from going back to bind9 and having to change the configurations again, and having to train the technical stuff again... If the change is due only to an admin tool, and not because the dns solution is better, I can't see a reason to change, as I can not use that admin tool. > Happy hacking,
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
