|| On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:55:40 +0100
|| Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
re> I don't think so. Your package doesn't need pkg-config. It can be used
without
re> it. If you use pkg-config in the app using the lib you can build-depend on
it
re> extra at that package...
>> Should I fil
|| On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:42:47 +0100
|| Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pr> If it is possible, I'd like to upload the packages to the experimental
pr> archive.
I think is the right place to put it.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
|| On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:18:24 +0100
|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
l> Otavio Salvador agreed to sponsor this package.
l> We decided to wait one week before upload it to the archive, in order to
l> get some more feedback. Probably we can already upload it. What do you think,
l> Otav
|| On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 15:51:15 -0500
|| Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And which I doubt we will get with LCC, since the kernel is the most
>> important piece which needs to be certificated.
im> The common core will include a common kernel. See the FAQ at
im> http://componentizedlinu
|| On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500
|| Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
km> Hi Folks,
km> I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
km> appreciated!
IMHO have one wrong information on that. When the package go to
experimental, it comes from DD .deb like when
|| On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:47:27 +0100
|| martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mfk> Based on the work of Kevin Mark (URL not available, sorry), I have
mfk> made a graph of the life cycle of a Debian package for inclusion in
mfk> my forthcoming book (http://debianbook.info). You can find the
|| On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:50:56 +0100
|| martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mfk> also sprach Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.1842 +0100]:
>> I think you might change this:
>>
>> incoming -> package source -> buildds -> package up
|| On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:36:59 +0100
|| Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pr> (If only Ubuntu would do an effort to get their "home-made" packages
pr> like xresprobe into Debian. :)
I talked with Daniel Stone about it and I'll maintain it inside of
Debian.
The current lack is it h
|| On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:00:37 +0100
|| Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mh> On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:16:31 +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mh> wrote:
>> * Torsten Landschoff:
>>> Wanted to do that - but! Does svk handle symlinks? Thinking of
>>> /etc/rc?.d and /etc/alternatives...
|| On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:39 +0100
|| Paul van der Vlis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pvdv> Hello,
pvdv> During install my videocard is not detected by Debconf. It is a cheap
pvdv> Nvidia compatible videocard what uses the "nv" driver.
pvdv> How can I tell the Discover-developpers about this vi
|| On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:09:07 +0100
|| Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tl> Hi Joey,
tl> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:42:49PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>> I've done this for years using the attached script (which will work with
>> both svn and cvs (less well), and can also tag release
|| On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:16:09 -0300
|| Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hdmh> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
>> painful to the installation team, I mostly wanted to ask: Is xprintorg
>> still needed to print from mozilla, openoffice, firefox, etc, or has
>> that bee
|| On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:13:46 -0300
|| Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hdmh> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> The problem is larger then that. Leave it on task will require update
>> of installation manual and update of all translation
|| On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:56:46 -0800
|| Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kp> Around 14 o'clock on Mar 10, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Back history: I added xprt-xprintorg to the desktop task at the end of
>> January after receiving bug #226605 which stated that
>>
>> More and more applications
|| On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:37:16 -0500
|| Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jh> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Not really. Like you did remember, exist some language that need it
>> for printing and in this case i think it should be included.
jh> What languages (and why)?
|| On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:27:49 -0500
|| linux romeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lr> Hello Marco/List,
lr>I am willing .
lr> I wish to work on a project which incorporates
lr> 1) State linux (http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/stateless/)
lr> 2)Meets most of OSDL Desktop Linux
Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On November 11, 2005 19:53, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I prepared a new package of grub for upload in next days. It still
>> needs some work but looks like a good improvement.
>>
>> Would be good if you could
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A lintian-like test to see if the listed bugs match the package before
> uploading seems more useful to me. It would have prevented this
> particular problem.
IMHO, is the best and easier alternative.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> I agree with "similar things being said" but i'm yet to hear about the
>> lack of collaboration and give Debian something back. For example: I
>> don't remember too much people caring about PGI (Progeny) and after
>> that anaconda "p
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would very much appreciate if folks would review
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00260.html and consider the
> points that I raise there. I put some effort into collating the issues
> which came up the last time and presenting them.
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * 1 FETCH (BODY[TEXT] {1008}
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> In my point of view, maintainer field just need to be change when
>> Ubuntu does a non-trivial change on it. Otherwise, at least to me, is
>>
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> In case of CDDs, the only exception is it isn't build against other
>> libraries but it is installed by different cd set and downloaded from
>> another location in many cases.
>
> If it is a CDD than it is installed from a Debian mirror and nothing else
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> Debian-EDU is available in Debian but also outside of it since they
>
> Well, that's a "temporary" hack until we have implemented solutions which
> makes this sup
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio, you seem to have been his sponsor, do you have any news from
> him in the last 6 months (or since January, 1st 2005, for that
> matter)? Anybody else?
I didn't have any news from him. :(
I think would be fine if you take over the package.
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The remaining question is the equivs package, which is NMU-maintained
> these days. I suppose that the qa group should take it after a week or
> two?
Hijack it?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
---
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should I file the mawk patch, attached, as a wishlist bug against
> mawk[3] ? It would be nice to be able to integrate the tests for each
> package as far upstream as possible; at the moment, that probably
> means putting it in the Debian packages.
If yo
Fernando Ike de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> retitle 335018 ITP:GNU Ferret - GNU Free Entity
This should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 2
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sick of this entire situation. It makes me ill, angry and utterly
> frustrated. It causes me being frustrated of Debian and unable to work on
> other issues, needing a rest more often that planned. I should do better
> with my limited life. Henc
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To continue the service of stable point releases to our users, Andreas
> Barth and I took over the Stable Release Management. We will try to add
> other people to our team, improving responsiveness and quality.
What will the process to someone who
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I strongly oppose to such an expulsion.
>
> It amazes me that people oppose expulsion, but are perfectly happy to
> allow the DAMs to decide whether or not a NM is to be let into the
> project. Why do we trust the DAM's judgement in one scenario but n
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]:
>> It seems that the project is splitting in two groups basically:
>> The people that wants to work together and release Etch, and the
>> people that with a reason or not wants to
|| On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:37:49 +0100
|| Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
gvb> Then the maintainer gets a bugreport saying they should
gvb> Replace/Conflict/Provide the silly name. Also ftp-mster could get an
gvb> automatic notice about new debs and a 3 day window to veto it or
gvb
|| On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:31:55 +0100
|| Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
gvb> How often does it actualy happen that ftp-master rejects the name of a
gvb> package? Did anyone have that happen to him/her when adding a new deb
gvb> to old source ever?
>>
>> This is not the only prob
|| On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:53:25 -0500
|| Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jh> The Debian Installer team is proud to announce the third release candidate
jh> of the Debian Installer for Debian GNU/Linux Sarge. We love doing this so
jh> much that we couldn't resist updating the installer one mo
|| On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:04:52 +0200
|| Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mz> I am currently on that (started last weekend). Jeroen sent me the CVS
mz> tarball. I hoped to finished it at the weekend but it's more than
mz> expected and i did not yet understand all code.
mz> Perhaps i
> "wesley" == Wesley J Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wesley> On Wednesday 13 April 2005 08:12, Patrick A. Ouellette
wesley> wrote:
>> PROPOSAL FOR DISCUSSION:
>>
>> I suggest we can eliminate the traditional concept of a
>> "release" with the addition of another
> "martin" == Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
martin> Hi all,
martin> On Monday, 04 Apr 2005, you wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2005 4:04 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I am currently on that (started last weekend). Jeroen sent me
>> the
Hello folks,
Like I proposed, I converted all CVS repository to Subversion[1].
1. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddtp/,
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
Current layout of the repository is:
- branches/
. a/ included on original source. We need to decide wh
> "steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
steve> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:06:31PM -0400, sean finney
steve> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >
>> The according bug is #306608.
>> having read through the bug report, it
> "daniel" == Daniel Macêdo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddtp/,
>> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
>> svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
daniel> I tried access now but the server is not available :(
daniel> [...]
I hope it come b
> "adeodato" == Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adeodato> * Bernhard Fischer [Fri, 20 May 2005 18:23:14 +0200]:
>> Hi,
adeodato> Hi Bernhard, I'm not a dpkg person at all, but the
adeodato> following advice sounds like common sense to me, and
adeodato> perhap
> "humberto" == Humberto Massa Guimarães <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
humberto> * John Hasler ::
>> Wouter Verhelst writes: > In practice, many third-party
>> applications will make assumptions > about the availability and
>> configuration of runlevels...
>>
>> Seems to
> "humberto" == Humberto Massa Guimaraes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
humberto> IMHO, there is a series of (serious) problems in such a
humberto> plan, such as:
humberto> * testing and unstable are not installable by
humberto> non-tech-folk, all the time, really. There can be t
> "steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
steve> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:00:43AM +1000, Paul TBBle
steve> Hampson wrote:
>> I just wanted to confirm my recollection that now that stable
>> has been released with support for ~ in package versions in
>> dpkg
> "adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adam> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:00:43AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson
>> wrote: > I just wanted to confirm my recollection that now that
>> stable has been released > with support for
>>>>> "colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
colin> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:04:32PM -0300, Otavio Salvador
colin> wrote:
>> >>>>> "adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adam
> "roberto" == Roberto C Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
roberto> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 04:47:39PM -0500, Adam Heath
roberto> wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:00:43AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> > > I
>>>>> "os" == Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>> "colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
colin> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:04:32PM -0300, Otavio Salvador
colin> wrote:
>>> >>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: buildbot
Version : 0.6.6
Upstream Author : Brian Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://buildbot.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description
> "lars" == Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
lars> la, 2005-06-18 kello 22:53 -0400, Joey Hess kirjoitti:
>> I want to run a test that installs each package in woody in
>> turn, upgrades them to sarge, then to sid, then purges it, then
>> looks for /usr/doc and /usr/i
> "aurelien" == Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
aurelien> Andreas Barth a écrit :
>> release blockers: - toolchain transition - xorg - sorting out
>> docs-in-main vs. the DFSG - SCC; amd64 as an official arch
aurelien> So SCC is now a fact, not a proposal anymore?
>>>>> "andreas" == Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
andreas> * Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050619 18:32]:
>> >>>>> "aurelien" == Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Helmut Wollmersdorfer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> A GUI can have better usability. E.g. some beginners don't know, how to
>> mark an item in a list for selection in the current installer. O.k.,
>
>
> Right. This has been reported quite often
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > This week, we will change the GCC default versions from 3.3 to 4.0
>>
>> Would it break kernel 2.4 builds somehow ?
>> I've not been quite following; but the thread almost a month ago
>> seems to indicate thus:
>> h
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Neither Ubuntu nor Debian do anything special to get hardware support
>> that is provided by the kernel proper and tools that neither group
>> created.
>
> That's not actually true. I do a lot of work in U
"Katrina Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I keep seeing your arguments about how some people want on;y a 100 MB system
> by
> default. But you do give an option to have a Desktop, even Laptop install.
> What not make those installs have better support for Desktop and Laptop
> Users.
> F
"Katrina Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/28/06, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> This is done by Desktop environmnet task. You might give a try to
> Debian once d-i beta3 goes out and then redo your comments.
>
> I
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>
>> On Jul 28, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> * xen integration
>> Everybody that matters is doing this.
>> BTW, where is this integration visible?
>> Do we have a VM provisioning system?
>
> Just
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 à 17:02 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
>> The Marketing thing behind Ubuntu works very well and we should
>> learn with them. We have a team to deal with Press and that might work
>> better. Ot
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, Christoph, I think you argued a good case!
>
>> I'll probably use bzr when I need to keep something revisioned
>> without much fuss just to save the time for "svnadmin create" and
>> a DAV share on my Apache. But for everything else I think I'l
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
> branching, merging, commiting and uncommiting (gotta love that) that
> they want, and when they're done, do e.g.:
>
> % bzr push sftp://costa.debian.org/bzr/pkg-xiph/vorbis-tools
W
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:31:37PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> Right, bzr is great when you have a designed person to integrate
>> contributor's changes after review.
>>
>> But if you have a set of equal developers, bzr can be also used in a
>> very s
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:36:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > Darcs has a nice way of pushing patches via e-mail, with GPG signatures
>> > even. These can be processed in an automated way on the server,
>> >
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:12:34PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > diff also doesn't preserve permissions, so some are using debian/rules
>> > anyway.
>>
>> Indeed but that can make thing broke due the wr
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> > But you lose debian specific patches to be clearly separated from the
>>> > upstrem source (digging diff.gz for that is not fun), unless one knows
>>> > where to find
>>>
>>> First, what is a "Debian-speci
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Otavio Salvador [Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0300]:
>
>> Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > Then each developer can prepare a set of changes offline, do all the
>> > branching, merging, com
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
> will operate over either a socketpair - i.e. tunnelling via ssh (which
> can still be done without granting shell access), or over plain http via
> an apache rewrite rule.
Is it al
Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, as a side note on this thread: *darcs is just far t
> slow* for decent maintenance of large pieces of software. I tried once
> to create a mozilla repository, do some work with it and it was completely
> unusable. I am not talking about minu
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > bzr is also working on a high performance server at the moment, which
>> > will operate over
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Anyway, as a side note on this thread: *darcs is just far t
>>> slow* for decent maintenance of
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
>> reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
>> designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
>> that moment.
>
> Then don't call it renic
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After every upstream merger, I have to review every patch applied to the
> package *anyway* to make sure that it's still sane, and I find that easier
> to do by reading through the contents of debian/patches than by running
> filterdiff on diff.gz and the
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The suggestion to use "nodaemon" as default for exim4 when only handling
> local
> mail will probably be rejected?
I guess you meant nullmailer.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAI
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> e.g.
> build: test_stable patch build-stamp
> instead of
> build: patch build-stamp
That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it
more flexible to allow it to work for CDDs too but I liked it very
much :-D
--
O T A V
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it
>> more flexible to allow it to work for CDDs too but I liked it very
>> much :-D
>
> It does not look right to me, though.. what about buildds? And what
> about people forge
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Copyright (c) 2006 Manoj Srivastava
>
>Revision History
>Revision 1.0.5 4^th November 2006
Setember?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:46:56PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>> Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> >> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:40 +0200
>> [...]
>> > After the second time, there is no plausible excuse.
>> > Do you have an excuse?
>>
>> Why do you ask if y
Rodrigo Tavares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I read many tutorials about debconf, but i´d like to
> know ro create the packages using debconf .
> I know the build package must be postinst, preinst,
> prerm, postrm, conffiles and config.
> Taking this tree, how i can to build a packag
Rodrigo Tavares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I alrady read this manual.
> In step called : advanced programing with debconf,
> show a algorithm is in config file, then i set
> postint, preinst, postrm, postinst, conffiles,
> templates.
> I want to know, how I'll create the package and
Rodrigo Tavares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> More one thing, i´m creating a package customized,
> where the script is run, them it it´s removed.
> When i try to remove this package, ask a question for
> user. I make it in bash. And i want to make using
> debconf. The all manuals about deb
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think this is best left to unstable/experimental. Adding yet another
>> layer of distributions would just increase the workload managing them.
>
> I didn't suggest it as a layer in the
> stable/testing/unstable/experimental spectrum. Rather, it is me
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Even if it's with versioning information? It would be usefull to keep it
>> until the buggy version is available in the archive, what do others
>> think?
>
> Archiving is currently disabled until the exact mechanism of its
> operation with versioning is
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> What's the current consensus right now?
>>
>> IMHO, we should display every bug that still affect stable so we won't
>> receive duplicated reports so often
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Christoph Haas schrieb:
>
>>>* NTP server
>>> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
>>> NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
>
>> I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>>
>> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
>> > FYI:
>> > 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
>> > clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a package ready at the moment. However, it only cleanly builds
> with the version of gcc in Sarge. I have been assured by upstream that
> a new release is forthcoming which fixes the build issues with gcc 4.x.
> Once it is out, the packa
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:05:13PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
>> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:12:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:22:51AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
>> > > Steve Langasek schrieb:
>> > > >>Package: oldpkg
Hello Folks,
I did the upload of our new LTSP version. Of course, I'm very happy
with it! It does a great job and will have a lot of new bugs since we
redid a lot of code.
Personally, I would like to thank firstly to Vagrant (vagrantc) who
spent a lot of time working with me at Debcamp and to Gus
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello Folks,
>>
>> I did the upload of our new LTSP version. Of course, I'm very happy
>> with it! It does a great job and will have a lot of new bugs since we
>> r
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also, there's some tools from ltsp-utils that might be good to have in
>> but then would be good if you join pkg-ltsp project and coordenate
>> with the rest of people what to get in.
>>
>> See you there ;-)
>>
> OK. If that is the case, pleas
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Agreed. Btw, it would be better keep Etch package descriptions updated
> during its support cycle, but i think it's impossible with the
> infrascture we've, right ?
No. We already have the previous working structure all up and
running. What we want t
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/6/06, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Agreed. Btw, it would be better keep Etch package descriptions updated
>&
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nice, thanks. While we're at this subject, what's your view on the
> Ubuntu language packs? Are we going to extract the translations from
> the packages creating language packs? It has pros and cons, and
> the best thing i see is the possibility to ke
"Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ otavio CCed ]
>
> On 06/18/2006 09:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
>>
>> Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
So
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>[Don Armstrong had a different suggestion here: Make the default view show
>anything applicable to unstable, _plus_ anything that is not marked as
>fixed in any version. I don't believe the difference is all that
>big.]
Since our
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:15:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Since our default development suite is unstable, IMHO, does make sense
>> to see bugs in previous versions that are solved in unstable.
&
Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:38, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to merge this with apt-cacher and combine your
>> skills and time? They do seem awfully similar in what they do if not
>> how they do it.
>
> Well, when apt-cacher started
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So before diving into into regular expressions any further (I have no
> practical experience with lookahead patterns for example) I would like
> to know if anyone else has worked on this. Perhaps even some Debian tool
> does this parsing. I need an impl
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:15:41AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > So before diving into into regular expressions any further (I have no
>> > practical e
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:04:54PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:15:41AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > > So befo
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
