ld like to help maintain
Ada-related packages. In time, such people might prove worthy
enough that I might advocate them :)
My GPG key has been signed by a Debian Developer:
$ gpg --list-sigs brenta
pub 1024D/9DFFAAD4 2003-07-10
uid Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROT
ackages,
11 RC bugs) for about 3 weeks now, and I'd really like to be able to
proceed.
If Ryan is the only person who can fix this, then Debian has a problem;
it would be nice to put a w-b admin *team* in place, for redundancy and
no single point of failure.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To U
ly, at most this is a
> hold-up.
Ah :) Well so far I have failed in executing my planned Ada
transition, because of this hold-up :) But it is not too late to
snatch victory from the jaws of defeat :)
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:47:13AM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>>
>> This issue has been blocking the Ada transition (19 source packages,
>> 11 RC bugs) for about 3 weeks now, and I'd really like to be able to
>> proceed.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 49a98df6-2bd4-40c8-a559-7e15212dbd26
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Recall the project leader
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Further discussion
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> a65763d3-b1e2-4530-8ff8-aa5915274eb4
> [ 3 ] Choice 1: Re-affirm DPL, wish success to unofficial Dunc Tank
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: Re-affirm DPL, do not endorse nor support his ot
nd not one that only applies to asis.
Thanks for any help.
PS. Please reply to me directly, as well as to the list.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor
>> www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be
>> reached; and lists
It has been a week since I sent the request below, and I received no
answer. I am resending to the three maintainers of
Packages-arch-specific, and CCing debian-devel.
I've restricted the list of supported architectures to those where
gnat-4.1 not only exists but also builds its shared libraries.
after
all. Or, is the 'dak' package an appropriate place for such requests?
Does anyone on this list feel like joining the packages-arch-specific
maintainers, in order to improve response time?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &
Aurélien GÉRÔME writes:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:56:06PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> So, my idea of a buildd pseudo-package in the BTS was a god one after
>> all. Or, is the 'dak' package an appropriate place for such requests?
>
>
transition of Ada packages.
Please respond directly to me as well as on the list.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g the situation).
If you plan to do an NMU of any of my packages, please wait until I
return, so you can coordinate with me. I *do* welcome NMUs, patches
and suggestions.
Also, please see http://www.ada-france.org/debian/debian-ada-policy.html
before considering an NMU.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
(signing
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 01:46:53 +0200
Source: gnat
Binary: gnat libgnat-3.15p-1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.15p-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 02:55:06 +0200
Source: gnat-doc
Binary: gnat-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.15p-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2003 03:42:16 +0200
Source: gnat-glade
Binary: gnat-glade
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.15p-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
gnat-glade - Distributed Systems Annex for G
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 03:10:47 +0200
Source: gnat-glade-doc
Binary: gnat-glade-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.15p-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
gnat-glad
PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2003 15:22:16 +0200
Source: asis
Binary: libasis-3.15p-1 libasis-3.15p-1-dev asis-programs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.15p-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chan
rebuilding it without gtk+extra2 and with
> Gtk3.0.
libgtkada2's upstream includes a copy of gtk+extra2; I don't know how up
to date this bundled version is. That's why, for the last uploads, I've
built libgtkada2 against the packaged gtk+extra instead of the bundled
copy.
coexist?
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2009/04/msg6.html
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
TK+3 are in Debian? My intention is neither to take over maintenance of
gtk-extra nor to remove functionality from GtkAda; rather to try and give a
clear roadmap for upstream to plan the necessary changes, i.e. reimplementing
some of GtkAda's widgets with GTK+3 instead of gtk-extra.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Selon Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> So, my understanting was correct then: gtk-extra2 will FTBFS only when
>> you remove GTK+2 from Debian, not when you introduce GTK+3.
>
> Yes, but that will also mean package using gtk-extra2 will not be able to
>
.org/~lbrenta/debian-ada-policy.html
[2] http://www.adaic.com/standards/05rm/html/RM-10-1-4.html, clause 5
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ljb78ysx@ludovic-brenta.org
Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>
>> Over the last two weeks I have been testing upgrades of
>> Ada packages from Lenny to Sid and Squeeze in a chroot.
>> The picture is not as pretty as it should be. In a
>> nutshell, when you change /e
Stephen Leake wrote:
> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>> The reason for all this is that when a package libX2-dev Conflicts:
with
>> and Replaces: a package libX1-dev, aptitude does not remove libX1-dev
>> and install libX2-dev; instead, it marks libX1-dev as broken and leaves
>
new version of a -dev package
(i.e. libX2-dev) is *not* a complete replacement for libX1-dev,
therefore we must use neither a dummy transitional package nor a
Provides relationship.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
David Kalnischkies writes:
> 2010/5/29 Ludovic Brenta :
>> David Kalnischkies writes:
>>> No. Replaces is used to say to dpkg: It is okay that this package
>>> overrides files of the other package - otherwise dpkg would complain
>>> loudly for good reasons
David Kalnischkies wrote:
> 2010/5/30 Ludovic Brenta :
>> The consequence is that, despite the fact that these packages are
broken
>> (without the need for a Breaks: in their successor packages, BTW),
>> aptitude prefers to leave them installed rather than remove them; t
age, which ones of
Conflicts: and Replaces: should I also specify? (currently, both
are specified; the new packages replace almost all files of the
old packages). The goal is, of course, to make unattended upgrades
that delete the old -dev packages and install the new ones possible.
Thanks for any he
Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
> David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> 2010/5/31 Ludovic Brenta :
>
>>> Option 1: upload a new package "gnat" that Breaks: all -dev
>>> packages that were present in Lenny but are no longer present in
>>> Squeeze. T
David Kalnischkies writes:
> 2010/6/6 Ludovic Brenta :
>> Package: gnat
>> Architecture: any
>> Depends: gnat-4.4 (>= 4.4.2-1)
>> Recommends: ada-reference-manual, gnat-gps
>> Breaks: libadasockets-dev (<= 1.8.6-2), libasis-dev, libaunit-dev,
>>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcharles0
Version : 0.0.20030813
Upstream Author : Matthew J. Heaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://home.earthlink.net/~matthewjheaney/charles/
* License : GPL
Description : Data structure library for
32 matches
Mail list logo
