Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> Where should I ask for help? Neither buildd.debian.org nor >> www.debian.org/devel/buildd, mention where the buildd admins can be >> reached; and lists.debian.org does not have a "buildd@" list. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I just committed a change to the > wanna-build-states page to that effect.
Thanks; I was aware of these, but the problem was not with any one architecture in particular; it was with Packages-arch-specific. Luk Claes pointed me to it, and I've submitted a request to the admins. (BTW, thanks, Luk.) It would perhaps be a good idea to mention the existence of Package-arch-specific, how it works, and who admins it on the buildd.debian.org front page, don't you think? Also, I would propose that a list, [EMAIL PROTECTED], or even better, a pseudo-package, buildd, be created for such issues. buildd would complement ftp.debian.org as a central place for buildd-related requests. >> I will upload ~20 source packages in the next few weeks, adding >> support for more architectures to each package. So I'm really looking >> for a general solution and not one that only applies to asis. > > There is no such general solution. See > <http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/wanna-build-states#not-for-us> Thanks. I had already read that. It says: ! A package in not-for-us or packages-arch-specific will not leave ! this state automatically; if your package specifically excluded a ! given architecture in its control file previously, but now includes ! more architectures, it must be manually requeued". But it does not say how I should go about "reque manually". -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
