Michael Banck writes: > Couldn't you get the problematic outdated packages (I assume this is > the case if you're talking about [testing?] transitions) removed > temporarily?
No, that would not solve the problem. The problem, as the subject line says, is that the buildds are not building my packages on all architectures. I need to see the build logs on all archs before I'm satisfied that my packages are in good shape. The Ada transition does not require the removal of any package. >> If Ryan is the only person who can fix this, then Debian has a >> problem; > > I assume the Debian administration team is responsible for this > task, but as Ryan is also a w-b and p-a-s admin, it sounds > reasonable to expect he will tend to it. Someone else (lamont) did the changes I requested on p-a-s; now the only remaining problem is that the buildds are not taking the new version of p-a-s into account, because they can't talk to the CVS pserver. >> it would be nice to put a w-b admin *team* in place, for redundancy >> and no single point of failure. > > I don't think we should talk of `failure' really, at most this is a > hold-up. Ah :) Well so far I have failed in executing my planned Ada transition, because of this hold-up :) But it is not too late to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat :) -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
