nk that a 2 month freeze
should be enouogh, but what I want to show is how both testing and
freeze could be used together.
Regards,
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-custom/2004/09/msg00033.html
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
-05-14.
> This is what I wondered every week but was to lazy to ask. Either something
> is broken or our both email systems are broken.
AFAIK, no one is receiving that mail. It must have been eaten
somewhere in the MXs or list servers.
Regards,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EM
ring them now will mean a lot of work, that we should concentrate
in releasing Sarge, not in other different stuff.
>
> [0] Please note that I am not a DD, and if I had been at the time of
> the vote, I would have voted for Proposal F.
Whatever you had voted, what counts is what has b
El miÃ, 17-11-2004 a las 23:26 +0100, Marco d'Itri escribiÃ:
> On Nov 17, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And documentation is not software.
> Since the "editorial changes" (LOL) general resolution, for Debian
> everything is softw
El miÃ, 17-11-2004 a las 22:44 +, Brian M. Carlson escribiÃ:
> Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > El miÃ, 17-11-2004 a las 19:27 +, Brian M. Carlson escribiÃ:
> >
> > [...]
> >> > Without wishing to start/take part in a h
sliterate for the name, if you don't use a
latin charset (Greek, Arabic, Japanese, Chinese...)
So I don't really see your point here. That you can write your name in
your native alphabet doesn't mean that from now people could write their
rules files in Chinese, or whatever.
Cheers,
-
El miÃ, 08-12-2004 a las 12:30 -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez escribiÃ:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 05:21:56PM +, David Pashley wrote:
> > On Dec 08, 2004 at 17:15, Luis R. Rodriguez praised the llamas by
> > saying:
> > >
> > >
> > > Its been more than a year now. What's the status of this ITP? Thi
ot of times, changelog is not a place for closing lists of
bugs without explanation.
Thanks,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Could you please fill in the template?
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
a HDD or in a magnetic device like FlashROM in your
device. In both situations the driver loads the blob or initialize it.
And won't work if it is not present. Well, it will work. It will tell
you that the device doesn't work because it lacks the firmware.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carl
mware from
hardware vendor CD. This is not optimal, but not being able to see what
you needs and what hardware hurts our users more, IMHO. And, after all,
we are not distributing any piece of non-free software, which is what
should concern us.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
x27;s words are applicable here, as
Thomas want to do.
With your criteria that you cannot use phrases said by other people in
a military context in a "civil" one, you will lost a lot of ways of
speaking... I guess you won't be using DMZ, firewall or another concepts
usually em
t discovery. But I think that this
tool is not very known yet. Perhaps you (as alsa maintainer) could add a
note to README.Debian in modules-source, explaining how to compile them
using module-assistant. (I don't know if it is already there, I'm
writing this offline and I don't have th
ject to identify a set of features for
> the new release. For example, had prestable existed for 3.1 the new
> installer would have been listed as RE.
>
> So ... Debian would still release "when its ready" but everyone has a
> better idea of what "ready" means simply by looking at the RE package
> list.
Why don't you put this idea in Debian Wiki?
(http://wiki.debian.net/?ReleaseProposals)
Thanks.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
El miÃ, 05-01-2005 a las 23:13 +, Matthew Garrett escribiÃ:
> Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I agree with you on this. People using stable can not cope with
> > upgrades each 6 months or so.
>
> The issue isn't the frequency of
kage.
So please, stop trolling.
Thanks,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
that tries to avoid those problems. When you use a low level tool, you
have to know how to use it, and which can be the effects of using it in
some way or another.
>
> Can I count on foo-utils Suggesting foo-source?
> Is there a policy I can read?
Yup, it is called Debian Policy.
each release, which also
means that a lot of people doesn't remember that release infraestructure
has also te be kept in good shape.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
ff eating their time (work, studies, ...)
Perhaps we should try to push some other teams in other key areas of
Debian (I can not think of any right now, but I am sure that they are),
and also in the infraestructure part. Of course, installer team is also
a key.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
have to use .commands files and try to upload one more time.
>
> SSH/SCP has very high priority in our LAN, so this way would be great for
> me... is it possible to use it?
Yes, scp to gluck (or other debian machine) and use dupload/dput from
there.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EM
ol mentioned is in elfutils, which is non-free. Blah.)
dh_strip does that. (man dh_strip)
We are using it for generating -dbg packages for both pwlib and
openh323, reducing their size in a factor of 35, and also speeding up
compilation, as no other libs must be rebuilt.
Regards,
--
Jose Carlos
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libapache-mod-choke
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Nathan Shafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copyright : Cyberheat, Inc
* URL : http://os.cybe
o wait for you package to be
processed in the NEW queue. There were a proposal for that to happen
(old sources don't traverse NEW when a binary package is added) but
nothing happened.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
ts needs. Supporting many architectures is only perhaps 10%
> of those needs.
And for statarting d-i I want to give you a great THANK YOU.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
FYI GNOME is not a unique source package but a bunch of source
packages, that can be (and are) upgraded independently. The only point
when almost all them must be uploaded together is when a new release is
made, and even then things don't need to go in a one push upload.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gloox
Version : 0.7.1
Upstream Author : Jakob Schröter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://camaya.net/gloox
* License : GPL
Description : C++
a will be package once a
final version is release and new versions of libraries it relies on are
also packagd and in good shape.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
some way or other).
BTW, if we start being more intregrist than those burning consulates
because of some drawings, we should start by removing GPG signatures and
md5sums from main, as those are invariant bits.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
a bit moron admin/user or a problem of the box being r00ted?
Thanks,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: evolution-sharp
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/evolution-sharp/
* License
o firebitch and make a campaing on WSJ to let people
know about the new software? How is then people going to get the
software? I cannot install anything that I don't know how to it is
named. I even cannot search for it... or are we going to call it "the
browser before known as firefox"?
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or Mozilla or Mozilla Firefox.
BTW, we should remove any gecko based browser too. After all they
depend in MOZILLA-browser. Not only firefox is going to be blamed here.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W; if we make snapshot.debian.net a .org service, we're shipping
sources yet. You have to distribute it, you don't need to mirror it all
around the world.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
such a deal as a project? Does the DFSG allow us to?
Yes and yes.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
El mar, 14-06-2005 a las 18:07 -0400, Eric Dorland escribió:
[...]
>
> I never claimed the renaming would not be confusing and
> painful. Sometimes we have to do painful things because they're the
> right thing to do. I think everyone realizes a rename would suck the
> big one. That's why I'm appr
does not run any daemon or anything else that can make your
system slower. It is only diskspace.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pyspi
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Zack Cerza, Chris Lee and Lawrence Lim (C) Red Hat
* URL : http://gnome.org/projects/dogtail
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dogtail
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Ed Rousseau and Zack Cerza
* URL : http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang:
n on the case, so we've removed all downloads from this page and
we ask everybody who have ever downloaded gaia 0.1.0 and prior versions
to delete all files concerned with the project, which include source
code, binary files and image cache (~/.gaia).
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
told me that
they were going to fix that ASAP, so we should check if this is true any
longer.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and not doing so was entirely my error.
And this deserves applause. Recognizing errors, or lack of
comunnication due to one, and showing a positive attitude is something
that has to be more spread on this project.
David, Daniel and other X team guys, my thanks for your great work,
effort
hey have even recognized their responsability!
Almost every person using unstable has been hit by this,
in one way or other, but I think that we should try to push in the
same direction.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
;
> apt-get install pbuilder cowdancer
>
> Then create the chroot image in /var/cache/pbuilder/base.cow/ with
>
> cowbuilder --create
Could this made configurabe as it is in pbuilder?
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gsf-sharp
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Martin Willemoes Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://svn.myrealbox.com/source/trunk/gsf-sharp/
* License
still don't get where is the problem with the example you are
trying over us once and another. If you are using the device you are
compiling the modules for, YOU HAVE the utils package installed yet.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
containing full
> information about the subprojects considered mature.
>
> [1] = "Mono for Debian", ipv6 (is it official or unofficial?),
> "ddtp", ...
Just because nobody proposed it? debian-lex started no so much ago,
and it was simply somebody proposing it and cre
> It is designed to utilize the new features of GNOME 2.0 including GConf
> and GTK 2.0.
If it's for GNOME you don't need to claim that it uses "new GNOME2
features", more when they're not so new ;-)
I'd remove that last sentence.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpX68ZseDbR8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
x files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old
> ones used instead.
>
> A alguien le suena algo ? Gracias de antemano.
>
> --
> Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpRoahcyaHHM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d like to see your solution ...
This is cool. And how about adding some way to also being able to put
in those metapackages configurations for those packages being
installed?
I'm thinking in projects like Debian-desktop and such, which can need
a way to configure some packages to fit their needs. Or a Live-CD
O:-)
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpzwNyy5pbxz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
EPTED
mail from Katie telling you that, and you'll be able to see it in
http://incoming.debian.org
Having a page showing that isn't very important, as the only info you
can show is the same you know yet: the package is in NEW or in
ACCEPTED queues.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp4zWEI7w6hb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
here :)
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpQzx0PgpmHL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gt; grepping mips and mipsel build logs for the warning).
> >
> > gphoto
>
> gphoto has been removed from unstable and will not be in the next stable
> release.
Why gphoto2 is still called that way? Shouldn't it be gphoto?
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL
ey loan you the air you breath?
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpSGETWDYD2w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n be perfectly
valid. If not, you can consider that a bug, as usually package should
have the same version than upstream's distributed sources.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ve, using the dash in the upstream version is not
a good option.
>
> The epoch number is not supported in the official fvwm sources.
You can also add the epoch number to your own packages. Thus, they will
be always newer than those coming from Debian, so they won't be
upgraded.
Hi,
First of all, sorry if you get this mail more than once.
I have just created the skeleton of what AMD64 certification page will
be [1].
Please, fill in the gaps.
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/amd64EtchReleaseRecertification
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED
; And here comes the lack of disk space...
Sorry, Joss, but I can't believe disk space can be a problem nowadays.
Of course you can be short of disk space, but a 160GB HDD is quite
affordable, and you can cache Debian lot of times there.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
sbackup has been merged and superseded by nssbackup, which is not yet
in Debian. I will see if I can get a version properly suited to be
packaged in Debian, and I will ask sbackup to be removed from archive.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rdup
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Miek Gieben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.miek.nl/projects/rdup/
* License : GPL version 3 only
only uploads, it was really obvious that a
> large number of them hadn't even been test built, never mind
> installed or used.[3][4]
I also think so, but as we say in Spain, you cannot be at the same
time tolling bells and at procession.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: conduit
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : John Stowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.conduit-project.org/
* License : GPL
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: goocanvas
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : Damon Chaplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/goocanvas
* License : LGPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pygoocanvas
Version : 0.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Gian Mario Tagliaretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[
s lenny
> will stop supporting threading on 2.4 within days/weeks of the etch
> release.)
And as I suppose, every package using this will need to be recompiled,
isn't it? Are this transition being coordinated in some way, or it will
be a wild transition?
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) stuck at
> >> master:
> >
> > You missed my talk on irc, and you missed the thread on private.
>
Here is some kind of explanation:
http://www.tribulaciones.org/blog/computers/ext3-performance_27-09-2004.html
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
(bayesian and so), SA2 is
not so obsolete, and basically *works* in machines in which SA3 won't.
(And my "home server" is a AMD K6-II 450, with 192MB RAM, not bad for my
own amount of daily mail)
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta p
s that it works, and though there are some
glitches that people would like to see fixed, writing another different
tool is only that: rewriting. And using the same language, i.e. there is
no perl vs. python, perl vs. php, ...
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
onclusion is that debconf is not particularly well suited to
> integrating several otherwise-unrelated packages and I am unsure whether
> working around the problem, or helping to improve debconf, or doing it
> some other way entirely is the better approach... thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
&g
and fills FTBFS bugs
on packages. Perhaps you could help them.
And if the only thing you like is to use the latest version of a tool,
please, get the CVS version, and help upstream to improve it.
/me, tired of Gentooers
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ith GNU?
It's very easy to say: "I switch" and then start to say that Debian
is blah, blah and blah, instead of helping to make things work.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:04:52PM -0800, Jon Kent wrote:
>
> --- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Could you run X 4.2 in, say, s390 that date? FYI,
> > X is supported in 11
> > archs in Debian, a lot more than upstream
>
se don't suggest that that removes any validity or
> value of the suggestion.
This way the version of packges installed will bounce back and forward
again. And I'm sure there is more problems I cannot see.
AH! If that package is a lib, you must also move all p
're not stuck with GNOME System
Tools, so they can also be used to write a KDE frontend. I do't like
to see so much people reinventing the wheel. GST also needs an util
for configuring the printers, so any help will be welcomed. And, FYI,
current GST developers are using Debian for
imilar
> probably won't be hard to whip together (although I guess we probably
> have half a dozen "graphical su"s in Debian already).
>
> FWIW, the GNOME System Tools root prompts don't seem to work for me...
It works for me quite fine. If there's a prob
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cryptplug
Version :
Upstream Author :
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB
- Design and implementation.
g10 Code GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Packaging and bug
r problem I see with this is that you lose this way the
benefit of having a bunch of mirrors near you. And (if some day)
packages are signed and checked in download time, you couldn't do that
either.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpsAXEte9zEE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
your TODO.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpxlUnAIARBA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
not use webwml? Re: Why DDTP? shouldn't it be
> DPTP? (was Re: spanish translations in DDTP now)
>
>
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:23:33PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> > >
> > > One question I have is why DDTP does not use webwml.
st is worth you can open a
project in alioth in the interim. You could use it also to have a CVS
repo for patches or packages you need to build.
Take a look at it.
Cheers,
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpfvCJEOms6g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e time and seems that there are some
people interested in this, I think that it's better this way.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpyCoNk6DrJT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in and go to ACCEPTED and after
dinstall into the archive or rejected.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgprJyprF5rBS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Wow!!
I only wanted to thank you for this great job (and also for seeing how
this could be used for projects like Metadistros)
Really impressive :D
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpN4OegFi0mR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nly using unstable, but upgrading it so short time before.
But this also shows that unstable works quite well. If unstable were
brokening or broken everyday, people won't upgrade it so often and
carelessly.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpian2kHQoS8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eply on the mail
sent to d-d-a, which is sent here by default.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp1F4EMICcNc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t; Do it using BTS directly.
This use of changelog is fine, IMO.
You make a mantainer upload using the modifications made in NMUs,
which has yet the Closes line. But they only tag the bugs as fixed.
I even think this is written somewore
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PRO
Hello, I have been trying to set Debian to display Euro symbol in X
Window, but I have found some problems.
First of all, I have uncommented in /etc/locale.gen this two lines:
es_ES ISO-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15
When I run locale-gen, this two locales are generated: es_ES
El 09 May 2001 12:03:28 +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo escribió:
> Hello, I have been trying to set Debian to display Euro symbol in X
> Window, but I have found some problems.
[...]
I have posted this to -devel because I think this is not an issue that
each Debian user must solve. The E
El 09 May 2001 13:51:15 -0500, David Starner escribió:
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:03:28PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
[...]
>
> > In XF86config I have the "XkbLayout" "es" in the InputDevice section.
> > This must include the euro symbol in
El 09 May 2001 15:36:59 -0500, David Starner escribió:
>
> This is a volunteer organization. No one's going to object if you
> submit bugs on the packages with patches to make iso-8859-15
> versions. (Remember that iso-8859-15 differs from iso-8859-1 by more
> than just the Euro.) (Bugs without p
El 09 May 2001 23:27:39 +0200, Hasso Tepper escribió:
[...]
>
> As I said something is done already.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0105/msg00712.html
Oh, sorry. I read your mail, and later I forgot it.
>
> iso-8859-15 is very important for Estonian users as well. Of course
> there
El Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 01:23:43PM -0400, Eloy A. Paris escribía:
BTW, Eloy
Do you know if version 2.2.2 is going to be released with passdb LDAP
support? I think that it is going backported from HEAD cvs version, but
I'm not very sure. Would you mind to compile SAMBA with LDAP support i
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Hi debfolks
>
> I'm using this command:
>
> debmirror /users/debian --nosource -h -d woody
>
> in order to have a local copy of i386 stuff for our net.
> What is the damn reason why it copies potato distribution instead?
m68k guys check this, please?
Thanks
PS: I'm CCing this to the m68k list
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpQlG2pSskZc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
93 matches
Mail list logo
