El mar, 14-06-2005 a las 15:12 -0400, Eric Dorland escribió: [...] > > Let's say we call it mozilla-firefox (assuming we are allowed to in the > > first place) and downstream (making some modifications) is not allowed > > to call it mozilla-firefox. If we call it debian-firefox then downstream > > is still not allowed (under the same conditions) to call it > > mozilla-firefox. The difference is not that huge to me. (but naming the > > package just firefox seems to me like a good idea in the first > > place) > > The difference is we have perhaps compromised our principles to keep > calling it Firefox. > > BTW, don't be fooled into thinking we'll be able to call it > debian-firefox. If we have to rename it will not be able to include > the string "firefox" anywhere in that name.
Then rename it to firebitch and make a campaing on WSJ to let people know about the new software? How is then people going to get the software? I cannot install anything that I don't know how to it is named. I even cannot search for it... or are we going to call it "the browser before known as firefox"? -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
