On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 14:39]:
> >> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> >> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can
On 5/18/06, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 18, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To make this speed up available to everyone, we have 2 main choices:
>
> 1. Make /bin/sh point to /bin/dash
> 2. Change #!/bin/sh for #!/bin/dash in the scripts
We have an even simple
Well, great we're now in Slashdot as new Java license supporters[0].
Of course, somebody noticed the error[1], but it isn't enough. The
original article[2] contains "DLJ also has support from Gentoo and
Debian.".
I haven't endorsed anything, so for those who prepared this and
submitted an announc
On 5/19/06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> > (b) the Software is distributed with your Operating System, and
> > such distribution is solely for the purposes of running Programs
> > under the control of your Operating System and designing,
> > developing
On 5/25/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
>> So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
>> script?
>
> Please go ahead. Anything relying on it
On 5/27/06, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Looking on packages.qa.debian.org, I'm seeing some confusing
information and am hoping someone can help me figure out what's going
on.
The bacula page lists a depends on openssl, which is accurate, and
says "not considered" -- which I g
On 6/1/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am faced with the problem on how to tackle multiline output from
an init.d script, which I have just converted to LSB. Since the
package is mdadm and RAID is kinda essential to those that have it
configured, I'd rather not hide informat
On 5/30/06, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nico Golde wrote:
> Would be useful if you could provide the package lists for
> the two images so we can see whats already included and send
> you patches.
The small one contains the standard system only, means, packages which
have Priority:
On 6/6/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(this report is a little bit late as it took time to finalize
it...sorry for the inconvenience)
The work on internationalisation (i18n) and localisation (l10n) at
Debconf6 has been particularly interesting and productive.
(...)
You wrote
On 6/6/06, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Agreed. Btw, it would be better keep Etch package descriptions updated
> during its support cycle, but i think it's impossible with the
> infrascture we&
On 6/6/06, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/6/06, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Agreed. Btw, i
On 6/6/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ Adding -i18n ]
On 06/06/2006 02:04 PM, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 6/6/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (this report is a little bit la
On 6/6/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2006 04:02 PM, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 6/6/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On 06/06/2006 02:04 PM, Gusta
On 6/6/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 02:04:09PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> You wrote a good overview about the possible workflow, but i still
> miss exactly how we (or the coordinators) will merge from third
> parties (eg: Rosetta) and
On 6/7/06, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 03:21:45PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Nice, thanks. While we're at this subject, what's your view on the
> Ubuntu language packs? Are we going to extract the translations from
&
On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
And works properly in Debian since what? Weeks? Months?:-)
It doesn't really work properly anywhere, does it? :-P
regards,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On 6/29/06, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I've got hold of an intel mac that I'm interested in getting Debian
running. I've seen quite a few folks running Debian on MacBook Pro at
Debconf in Mexico, and I'm surprised that there aren't Debian
packages.
The things I'm planning on
On 6/30/06, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
On 6/29/06, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:25:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mer 28 juin 2006 23:20, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>> So you don't have any excuse to not update your packages any more.
>> About 60% of the Python modules have already been updated,
On 6/30/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
> "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier
On 7/17/06, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
New derivatives keyword
---
[...]
The Ubuntu distribution will be the first to make use of this new feature.
Each time that a new package is uploaded to Ubuntu, the PTS will receive
the diff between the new version a
On 7/17/06, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> New derivatives keyword
> ---
> Each time that a new package is uploaded to Ubuntu, the PTS will receive
> the diff between the new version and the prev
On 7/17/06, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:59:41PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-patches/
That's indeed great to address my concern but ...
> >A dumb way to implement that is of course s
On 7/17/06, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-07-17 20:48, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 7/17/06, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > New derivatives keyword
> > ---
> > [...]
> > The Ubuntu
On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> here are some news about the latest changes made to the Package Tracking
> System.
>
> New derivatives keyword
> ---
>
> The PTS will be
On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:33:45PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> Hello everybody,
>
On 7/18/06, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The NEW queue is down to *22* packages, which is totally unheard of.
Only three packages have been waiting longer than a month -- so
Javier's package is no longer in the 'endless wait' state.
At the same time, the RM bugs are in fairly good
On 7/19/06, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-07-18 00:10, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Thanks Scott, i'll stop scottwatcher and update the current page[0]
> with details about the new stuff.
>
> [0] =
> http://people.debian.org/~stratus/scottwatcher
On 7/19/06, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-07-17 20:39, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The Ubuntu distribution will be the first to make use of this new feature
No, i've told him (and jvw if i recall correctly) about the
scottwatcher's idea / PTS integration and they decided
Katrina,
We accept crack pipe donations.
thanks,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be a developer to
start/maintain a new subproject and follow (obviously) the DFSG and the
decisions of the entire project.I'm just trying start some points to be included
in the "Debian subproject guidelines".
Cheers,
Gustavo Franco
ian.org, alioth, and *.debian.net being a few popular
> alternatives).
Yes and it isn't only a list containing these projects.As i said, we need the
guidelines to subprojects too.
> [...]
Cheers,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
oject-howto can be the start to 'Debian
Subproject Guidelines' or 'Debian Subproject Policy'.What do you
think, Ben?
Cheers,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
7;)
requesting the new packages.Wait the maintainer response, if is MIA
you will know.
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
aintainers are DDs too.
Closing, congratulations for both teams anyway.
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
y maybe using a
different approach if the user change his video card, plug a new input device
or whatever.
Closing, what are the side effects (if any) that this split up and
modularization will
put on the loop for stuff like lessdisks and ltsp ?
--
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
kernel team. It isn't my point,
my problem is with this "didn't you know, read X stupid!" approach.
Just reply or let anyone else help the developer or user asking us.
Didn't he asked the rationale behind it? Just inform on this list and
will you sound way better.
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco
rude to assume it was without investigating first.
Frans,
I understand your point now, my response was more a 'wake up call' to
stop being rude even when anyone try to start yet another nonsense
flamewar.
Cheers,
Gustavo Franco
n't need to know the results of
all the Debian users to prepare detailed reports about package
usability (in percent), but is there anyone in the project with
academic background about this subject ? I'm just curious, because i'm
working in a similar project that's is not related (directly) with
software.
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
but it would be cool if popcon data was available in more script
friendly formats.
--
Gustavo Franco
d systrace in Debian but the related packages were orphaned a
while ago and it was removed[0] because nobody cared to maintain the
packages. If you're interested in a replacement, there's a ongoing
effort to add selinux support for etch.
[0] = http://bugs.debian.org/289539
Best regards,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
> Squeeze.
>
> Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
> but I have not discussed this with him)
> Issues to
(...)
Reminder: DebConf7 Registration
---
(...)
If you are applying for travel sponsorship, make sure you have entered
your full travel details and costs.
Hi Moray,
Could you confirm that my form has enough information? I felt the lack
of feedback on this matter, si
On 1/28/07, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10914 March 1977, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> If you are applying for travel sponsorship, make sure you have entered
>> your full travel details and costs.
> Could you confirm that my form has enough information? I felt t
On 2/5/07, GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers wrote:
Hello, Debian world!
This is a status update for the Debian GNU/FreeBSD port[1]. This port
consists of two architectures: kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64.
(...)
Do you know if there is a way to build Debian GNU/kFreeBSD Live cd
images using live-pac
On 2/6/07, Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alle 11:03, martedì 6 febbraio 2007, Daniel Baumann ha scritto:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > Do you know if there is a way to build Debian GNU/kFreeBSD Live cd
> > images using live-package's svn tree ?
>
> un
On 2/6/07, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco a écrit :
> On 2/5/07, GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers wrote:
>> Hello, Debian world!
>>
>> This is a status update for the Debian GNU/FreeBSD port[1]. This port
>> consists of two architectures:
On 3/15/07, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm willing to present a Debian project proposal for the Google Summer
of Code [1] for implementing a web frontend for reporting bugs to the
Debian BTS. I'm volunteering for being a mentor for such a project. I've
expertise in th
On 4/2/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As some of you may have noticed, the patches.ubuntu.com website and
equivalent mailing of changes to the Debian PTS and ubuntu-patches
mailing list has been offline, or at least intermittent, for a few
weeks.
This was caused by the hostin
On 5/9/07, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to craft an hypothesis about number of Debian users, from
apt-listbugs logs. I've analysed merkel.debian.org access logs. Since
etch was released, 3 unique IPs were used to access
merkel.debian.org using apt-listbugs. Accord
On 5/9/07, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On mer, 2007-05-09 at 17:49 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> What do you think?
> We think this is one of the available ways for a best desktop
Hmh, a nice idea would be to add preview thumbnails next to each item,
because
On 5/9/07, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.09.2249
+0200]:
> After some comments in debian-desktop list[1], the DebianArtwork Team[2]
> prepared the DebianArt.org site[3].
Why not art.debian.{net,org}?
Feel fre
On 5/30/07, Joachim Breitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone still uses the re-ordered ubuntu patches
provided by the Utnubu team at
http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/
If nobody finds this useful, I'd probably do the alioth admins a favor
if I stop the cr
I would like to ask you interested in our next release to stop and
look at 'testing' for a while. I believe that now, during the start of
a development cycle and during debcamp/debconf we've a interesting
opportunity to review pros and cons of our current approach.
We believe that 'testing' means
On 6/11/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> * testing metric is too simple, packages are allowed to enter testing
> only after a certain period of time has passed no matter if much
> people tested it before that and just when they don't have
>
On 6/12/07, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) The 'remove experimental' proposal
>
experimental is not a 'full' branch like stable, testing or unstable. It
only has a handfull of package built for it (at least that is what I
have seen from reading debian-devel-changes)
Also, there is n
On 6/12/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Sorry, i forgot CUT it looks like a 0 proposal since it came first.
> How and when do you plan to start a team for that and have you
> considered who from other teams will need to join/agree on the
Hi Luk,
On 6/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
> * Switch unstable (release) for not automatic updates
They are only automatic as far as the Release Team wants them to be as
explained earlier...
I'm not writing about "automatic"
On 6/12/07, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:29:59AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Considering that we know that experimental is not a full branch and
> there's no migration from experimental to unstable, do you agree then
> we could rem
On 6/12/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Do you think that the numbers are positive in terms of testing usage,
> really? I see the numbers even if not that reliable as proof of my
> argument that just a few (almost half if compared with unstable)
On 6/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 6/12/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> > Do you think that the numbers are positive in terms of testing usage,
>> > really? I see the numbers e
On 6/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Hi Luk,
>
> On 6/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Gustavo Franco wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>> > * Switch unstable (release) for not automatic updates
>>
>&
On 6/12/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 21:40, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > * What effect do you think removing experimental will have on
> > unstable? * How do you think it will have that effect?
> >
> I think it will have a positive eff
On 6/12/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 04:40:54PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> >* What do you mean by "switch unstable automatic nature to not
> > automatic"
> In a few words, move the 'NotAutomatic: yes'
On 6/27/07, Frédéric PICA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greets,
I have some interrogations about apt :
I want to develop a centralized system holding what packages operations
happened on a remote debian system (in a database).
I'm using the DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs apt option to get information about
On 6/27/07, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
as discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED], we're looking for a copy of dpkg's old
arch repository used while Scott James Remnant was dpkg's maintainer.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2007/06/msg6.html
If anyone has a copy of it, pl
On 6/28/07, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ter, 2007-06-12 às 10:26 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
> Any idea on how to collect more reliable data in a opt-in base? Does a
> survey on pentabarf (or public acessible) during debconf makes sense?
Huh How can "opt
On 7/4/07, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2007 at 09:14:24 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. It's a
> > critical bug, which should norma
On 7/10/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Also, why don't we create a meta-package in the BTS for priority
> > changes?
>
> It would actually just be enough to create a set of usertags for
> priori
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Looking at http://popcon.debian.org/ >, it seem to me that the
> number of stable installations is dropping fast. The graph
> "popularity-contest versions in use" show this, with version 1.41
> being the one in stable.
>
> When the ver
On 8/1/07, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (...)
> > I tried the sample commands and apt wanted to add HALF A GIGABYTE of
> > unnecessary stuff!!! Others may consider hard disc space cheap but, in
> > truth, hard disc space is not infinite
On 8/8/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tim,
> > In addition, there is not reliable solution for suspend/hibernate,
> especially
> > from X. There still some way to go for X and the kernel to get to there.
>
>
> The bundled suspend scripts seem to be improving somewhat, but they need
>
On 8/8/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Tim,
> I'm a new (though fairly knowledgeable) Debian user and possibly a
> prospective developer. Anyway, though I do like Debian a lot, one thing is
> obvious - it lags somewhat behind as a desktop (or laptop) distribution as
> compared to
On 8/8/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (...)
> >
> > It seems that we have no support for FAAC in main yet. Could you point
> > out a package, set of packages or upstream projects that I should look
> > for?
>
> I meant faad, sorry. Here's the main lib:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/u
On 8/9/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > - driver detection
> > We've driver detection, what's wrong with this feature in your use
> > case scenario?
>
> I was talking about driver detection with out-of-tree drivers that must be
> built with "module-assistant". It actually looks li
On 8/9/07, Tim Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > My browser (iceweasel) does include .mov as a supported format. All the
> files I try to play open a player applet, but it does nothing. Trying to
> open them manually with Totem results in a "Video Codec Advanced Video
> Coding (H264) is n
On 8/9/07, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> > Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu:
> > > Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has nothing with
> > > multimedia (means: surprise, you can use
On 8/9/07, Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Qui, 2007-08-09 às 14:10 +0200, Michael Banck escreveu:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> > > Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu:
> > > > Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has
On 8/9/07, Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 08 August 2007 23:02 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> > [Julian Andres Klode]
> >
> > > We should try to use binary packages provided by linux-modules-* or
> > > other modules packages by default and fallback to m-a.
> >
> > You migh
On 8/9/07, Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:20 -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
> >
> > We already have this on the desktop, from what I can
> > see (there is evidence of a
> > scaling-module-loading-thingummy running on boot)
Do we have an up-to-date dump of packages metadata (name, version,
short and long description) somewhere in a similar form popcon is
generating and keeping its information available at popcon.debian.org
for download?
thanks in advance,
-- Gustavo "stratus" Franco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:36:23PM -0800, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> Do we have an up-to-date dump of packages metadata (name, version,
>> short and long description) somewhere in a similar form popcon is
>> gener
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:39:31PM -0800, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> Would it
>> be possible to add more fields if passing more flags
>> ?format=txt.gz&extra_fields=maintainer ... ?
>
> IMHO a quite flexible way to get the information yo
package[0], it shows 1.4.1-1 (unstable)
but looking into [1] it points to 1.4-1.
[0] = http://packages.debian.org/moodle/
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/moodle
--
Gustavo Franco
L for further information.
[0] = http://packages.debian.org/tz-brasil/
Hope that helps,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:50:44 -0300, Rosilene Oliveira
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to know if there is a version to convert the time o
> [...]
>
> [0] = http://packages.debian.org/tz-brasil/
I'm sorry, the right url is "http://packages.debian.org/tz-brasil";
that slash in the end doesn't exists.
--
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it official or unofficial?),
"ddtp", ...
Comments?
Regards,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2003.05.23 12:51, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
> and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful
Agreed and please don't forget Eucalyptus[0].
[0] = http://eucalyptus.cs.ucsb.edu/
2009/3/28 Obey Arthur Liu :
> Edouard Nemours a écrit :
>> Dear List,
>>
>> i'd love to raise awareness of the fact that many companies and users of
>> debian hosts move their systems to "the cloud" (for instance a
101 - 189 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
