a PERSON on
the list, rather than keeping it off the list. If you feel the need to insult
someone, then PLEASE, do it in private e-mails so it doesn't get out of hand.
David Bristel
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
These two lines should be run after you update your /etc/apt/source.list to
point to unstable.
Dave Bristel
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, [iso-8859-1] Staffan Hämälä wrote:
> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 20:44:48 +020
> "Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> I just did an upgrade. The menu pkg ate memory like no
Adam> tomorrow.
[...]
Adam> Cease and desist at all costs.
Adam> I have just been informed on irc that a fixed menu is in
Adam> incoming. So, it should all b
s gated which install
themselves in /etc as the default also drive me crazy. Now, back on topic, if
you need to share a file NIS/NIS+ will work. Someone else may have a better
solution, such as Samba.
David Bristel
> Apart from /etc/mtab (which ca
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "A. M. Varon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Could we have a potato mailing lists?
>
> That's part of what debian-devel *is* for. Why would we want another
> list for it?
Ben answered on _debian-devel_, but not on _debian-user_; I hope he
doesn't min
;t
influence the possibility to edit the file in another program, however.
> - just curious: what other times do you need to change this file type?
The time is stored in the resource-fork on the Mac, and sometimes it gets
screwed (programs that can't transfer dual/multi
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 02:34:20AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
[...]
> > unreproduced
> > reproduced
> > possible fix
> > known fix
> >
> > Basically I see bug fixing as proceeding sequentially down this list.
> > There's a state above "unrepr
If no, I download the sources and make a new
> packages...
If you look in woody, you'll find this version of fetchmail.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
27;re not the
same, then you have a problem. I don't see how this fits
with what you're saying.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
The solution to this is that we ignore woody for the moment, and begin an all
out effort to get the 2.4 kernel, XF4.0, and Apache 2.0 into Debian as STABLE.
The work for these things can also incorporate the work needed to re-add the
packages that were removed because of bugs. I know people LOVE t
I agree, we shouldn't care about "keeping up with the other dists" when
stability may suffer because of it. At the same time, as you have noticed,
there are a number of commercial packages out there that may require the newer
kernel versions, or apps. We do NOT want people to choose Redhat over D
Do you remember GNOME 0.30? I do because it was in stable after 1.0 was
released. What would YOU call the more stable version? Just because something
makes it into stable doesn't mean it's really a fully stable package. And just
because something is NEWER doesn't mean it's not stable, or even "
8:25 -0800
> From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: David Bristel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!
>
> David Bristel wrote:
> > The solution to this is that we ignore woody for the moment, and
ble is set correctly.
- Dave
--
+--+-------+
| David Webb | The believer is happy; the doubter is wise. |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - Hungarian Proverb |
+--+---+
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 01:36:49AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> David Webb wrote:
>> I had the same problem. Installing libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 fixed it on my
>> system.
>
> I cannot reproduce this. Works fine for me without that library installed.
>
>> You also have to
would
guess it's something on your side.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What happened to the ITP for it? I didn't see a package yet.
I started working on it, but didn't get very far (due to lack
of time, not any particular problem). If you'd like to take
it over I'll pass what I've done to you; otherwise I will get
back t
Package: general
Version: 2323
Severity: important
Partial output of
apt-get install ssh
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
ssh: Depends: gmp2 (>= 2.0.2)
E: Sorry, broken packages
There appears to be a libgmp2 package which replaces gmp2. Apt-get does not
substitut
nd of PGP output --]
GnuPG bug or local configuration problem?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:08:10AM -0600, David Starner wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:32:13PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
>
> Did this message mess with GnuPG on any one else's system?
> I had to kill gpg (1.0.1-2) to get mutt to continue, and then
> I got
>
This is one of the reasons why I've been happy I bought a Smart-UPS, not only
does it provide more information(ammount of battery power and UPS load as well
as other information), but the apcd package for APC monitoring worked
on it out of the box for slink.
wrote:
> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:45:41 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: David Bristel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Thomas R. Shemanske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Debian Development liste
> Subject: Re: UPS setup problems (ap
ask this list for someone to sponsor it
into Debian. Assuming that it has a DFSG (Debian Free Software Guidelines)
compliant license and it's packaged right, someone should be willing to
do that.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
s
ing, a lot of admins may not like the arbitrary
enabling of executable formats in the kernel. This is true especially
in its experimental phase (sort of like debconf is now.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that&
can be recompiled locally, it wasn't worth the archive
space or the manpower or extra trouble.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
-- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:35:08AM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Apr 2000 20:28:41 David Starner wrote:
>
> > Um, that's not what I've heard. Since optimizing for the Pentium
> > will sometimes pessimize the Pentium (Pro, II, III), and the
> > spee
to take these over, please drop me a note in the
next few days.
David
--
David Engel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 05:34:01PM -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> So, is there any plan to use them (like recompiling the package on the user's
> machine)?
Yes, that is the plan. No, there is no other plan.
(Why can't we have cool undying threads like, I don't know,
ed enough usage
through other channels to be raised to standard.
Speed reasons - gzip is significantly faster than bzip2, which matters
for old ix86 (x=3,4) and m68k machines which run Debian.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.net.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night t
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 05:06:34PM +0600, Sergey I. Golod wrote:
> David Starner wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 03:15:10PM +0600, Sergey I. Golod wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Why apt/dpkg doesn't use bzip2 for Packages file?
> > >
&g
se the only bug
on it, if any one wants to upload it, or sponsor me (I am in
new-maintainers now.)
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye.
problem with the music: it is free distributable but the author
> does not want it to be changed. Is there any license that conforms
> to DFSG but does not allow modification of code (=artwork in this
> case) ?
Huh? No, definetly not. Such would, without question, go against the
spirt
re
> October 15th or so. Please.
Um, then can someone do an NMU? It should be a recompile.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried forever,
It was blinding with snow on the night that they screamed goodbye.
-
didn't see if it was installed.
I was wondering what happened to it? It didn't appear in the
archives, it wasn't moved to REJECT or DONE, it just disappeared.
I was wondering if there was some long flame war on debian-private
that I was missing.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:29:32AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> packages into unstable. Helix is too stable for unstable, and too unstable
> for stable.
Not exactly true, as Helix Gnome is usually more cutting-edge than unstable
Gnome.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
er science lab. Regularly too, I might add.
I take it this is LART-worthy incident, as I don't think I can
load my .xsession in under 6 seconds. Since *dm requires you get a
username and password (bwahaahaa!), use it.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
It was sta
hed over
to the GTK plugin, not because it looked better (because it doesn't), but
because QT is 5 MB in memory, more than GTK + Glib + Gnome libs. At least
we can stop the idelogical arguments.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 09:21:02AM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:05:27PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> > > > I guess RevKrusty may want to put his packages into Debian?
> > >
> > > He already uploaded kdelibs, I didn't see if it w
nstable libraries. If you want to build them so that potato users
can use them, do so and store them in a directory on master or
a private machine and tell people how to get them.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
It was starting to rain on the night that they cried
t.
> We have pandora for that, and I remember Wichert agreed to this use.
> What still needs to be done to have a debian section for software
> covered by software patents?
The problem is not "patents", it's that this particular patent also
applies in Germany, meaning we ca
would want to regenerate them, not edit the
> unwieldy auto-generated code.
Then it could go into contrib. It's free, but depends on something
outside of Debian to build.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
I knew all of the floors in my high school, and none of
hat downloads them & installs them. (Or
> both.)
If the program needs one to run, then at least one should be packaged.
I'd prefer not to see a lot of installers that download free software -
the one's that download non-free stuff are annoying and cause enough
problems as it is.
-
bugreport.
http://bugs.debian.org has complete instructions on how to do that, or
you can run bug if it is installed.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning.
;fixed" events in the Jewish calendar.
> >
> >Julian
>
> And events in the Wicca 'calendar' are based on the solstices and
> equinoxes and would not be fixed either.
Instead of doing this every year, why not write small programs to generate
a new Wicca
I ran dselect, and lo and behold, checkmp3 appeared. A package
with the same name, similar version number (1.97.3 vs. 1.97.2),
same description and same maintainer as mp3check. This is bad -
should I file a bug on f.d.o, mp3check, checkmp3, or all the
above?
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED
e KDE in a matter of what, a week?). You sounded
like some wild-eyed fanatic, not someone pointing out a real problem
and discussing solutions.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org
And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race.
Lost in spa
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:12:45AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 10:47:22AM -0700, erik wrote:
> > I just can't keep my mouth shut about this any longer and the
> > unnecassary divisions (read demolitions) of KDE packages are the last
> > straw
B
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 01:50:04PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> http://nm.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to make a suggestion for the NM pages, but I'm not sure where to
send it.
Would it be possible to post the dates in ISO date format -MM-DD. When
my brain sees 2000-xx-x
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> The problem is L4M3RZ using that broken piece of non-free shit PINE, which
> doesn't appear to respect *any* conventions of netiquette.
Is there a free mailer to replace "that broken piece of non-free shit
PINE" that supports IMAP?
http://www.mserv.org/
License is BSD.
Description: local centralised multiuser music environment
Mserv is a music server designed to do a number of things better than most
systems designed to play mp3s:
.
Supports any type of client using standard TCP protocol
Stores information on mp3
e. But I haven't, even for a speed-up
that maybe as big as what the kernel will give you, and I would
reckon that most of the other people that had the libc-i[56]86
packages installed haven't either. It's analogous to the kernel
problem.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Poi
o break stuff manually configuring
your kernel instead of going apt-get install kernel-2.8.88-i686.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
ndard kernel-image.
But this thread's discussion ducks. It will point to nothing, if noone will
suggest a solution. What's about the kernel images to be pseudopackages
with special configs depending on patches and kernelsource to build a
kernel live when
Sweet! I'm kind of surprised no one packaged it sooner. I'm glad it's on its
way though.
- David Nusinow
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s to only apply to
> 2.4 at the moment.
Hmm, no, but if had read th P.S. you would have seen...
so long...
David
--
__ _ | David "netzwurm" Spreen Kiel, Germany
/ _|___ ___| |__ __ _ _ _ | http://www.netzwurm.cc/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| _/ _
Recent versions of upx can compress a linux bzImage (I've seen 13% shaved off
a bzImage). debian-installer may use it to squeeze more onto the single
floppy (kernel + initrd with modules).
David
Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 06:25:10PM -0700 wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, John H. Robinson,
Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:52:55PM -0700 wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:39:07PM -0700, David Whedon wrote:
> > Recent versions of upx can compress a linux bzImage (I've seen 13% shaved
> > off
> > a bzImage). debian-installer may use it to squeeze more onto the
7;round. We don't have to have a
conference in the Northeast, after all.
- David Nusinow
he NM process
> confused.
Another point of note is that nascent packagers are encouraged to adopt
other software that's already in the archive before packaging new
items. In this case, he is merely following that advice.
- David Nusinow
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:46:45AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Another point of note is that nascent packagers are encouraged to adopt
> > other software that's already in the archive before packaging new
> >
nvoke-rc.d
right now, but the next project I was planning to tackle was an
update-alternatives frontend. If you're interested in collaborating on
this, write me back and we can get started on it. I'd much appreciate
some help. If you want to see an example of how it would work, take a
look at configure-debian as it is.
- David Nusinow
e on the web, but there was debate about
whether or not a list should be included in one of the debconf
packages, or perhaps some other package.
I'd like to hear some comments on this whole idea. It'd help integrate
Debian more tightly, and would provide even more incentive to totally
standardize on debconf for certain tasks. It would be appropriate for
this bug as well, allowing integration of location based data.
- David Nusinow
mprovement:
> I'd suggest /etc/mailname management as an example of something that's
> ad-hoc at the moment. debconf-doc seems like the correct package in
> which to put a registry.
Works for me. Of course, the debconf maintainer should weigh in on the
idea of adding to his package.
- David Nusinow
the arse. Having it
only rsync the changes would be so nice.
/David
--
o/~ It would be so nice, it would be so nice o/~
o/~ It would be so nice to meet some time o/~
Five brownie points to the first to guess the artist...
f binutils/gcc/etc, it becomes less likely
that libc5 will work properly without serious tinkering).
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/> David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander <\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/
tting embedded processors, many of which - in current product -
are 486, 586 or at best 686 (some are Via C3 which is sort of 686). So
while conventional PCs may have moved on, there are a lot of potential
users out there who have not - this way thay do not need fans, do not
need lots of power,
. Afaik it still has quite some
race conditions in the v2.4, and there are still things left that need
to be solved in a nice manner (just ask Alexander Viro...)
[snip]
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Northern lights wander (\
// Maintainer of the
't fix the bug.
> > 3. bump the supported processor, and rename the port
> > 4. like 3, and also add an i386 distribution which does not support
> >C++ at all
> > 5. like 4, but support C++ in a way incompatible with other Linux
> >distributions in the
Package: general
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-23
Severity: normal
Tags: sarge
Several packages like html2ps or apt-file are broken in sarge because
they were put from sid before their dependencies. The coming to sarge
of a package should not be done if it makes it uninstallable.
-- Syst
Le Mon 23/06/2003, Colin Watson disait
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:36:27AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > Package: general
> > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-23
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: sarge
> >
> > Several packages like html2ps or apt-file ar
Le Mon 23/06/2003, Colin Watson disait
> I haven't looked at them in detail. But:
>
> html2ps is broken due to perlmagick, which is still at a perl 5.6
> version in testing. This was temporarily necessary because getting perl
> 5.8 was more important than waiting for all of perlmagick's
> depende
the only ones to suffer from this wait, it
seems like a good tradeoff. If we require a separate package for each
compiler, I imagine many library packagers would opt for just packaging
their library for ghc, which would be a shame as far as portability goes.
--
David Roundy
http://www.abridgegame.org
as part of KDE, Eclipse is only available in unstable at the
moment (I don't think it has made it into testing yet but I may be wrong).
David
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:00:21PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> >
> > static inline _Atomic_word
> > __attribute__ ((__unused__))
> > __exchange_and_add (volatile _Atomic_word *__mem, int __val)
> > {
> >register _Atomic_word __result;
> >__asm_
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 14:28, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> Hello people! =)
>
> I became a maintainer recently, when I took the prozilla package from Gustavo
> Noronha Silva (kov), a few days ago. I am now trying to finish my second
> Debian Package: cgiirc.
>
> Unfortunately, the program pu
d systems have too little memory
to run Debian) but loosing 486 and 586 would mean that Debian was
no longer an option for embedded systems which would be a great
loss.
David
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 12:00, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:57:57AM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
> > and remember that many embedded processors still use 486 and 586
> > based chips, and some 386. Lossing 386 might be acceptable in the
> >
for 80386.
There is afaik. Not in widespread use though, and the Linux kernel
hasn't been ported to that hardware. I think we can safely ignore
this hardware without stepping on anyone's toes...
/David
--
/) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Northern lights wander
thank you very much.
> >
> > Happily, the noninteractive debconf frontend exists.
>
> And getting hundreds of emails after a mass upgrade? No thanks.
man 5 procmailrc
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Northern lights wander (\
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:53:55AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:34:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> | The Debian Social Contract says "Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software".
> | If there are things "in Debian" that are "not free" or "not software",
> | then we
ad continues to take place in L.A. because the
local authorities purchased their quotas (of course, L.A. might be a
bad example, because I know that they _are_ doing their best to reduce
pollution even though it's a tough struggle.)
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Northern lights wander (\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/(/ Full colour fire (/
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:36:55AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:15:58PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> There are currently 5 packages in unstable that dump plugins under
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, not to mention several more contrib/non-free
> installers that do the same t
can't say that about boot-floppies. I, for one, hope that the aim
is to eventually have a very friendly installer. Even the most
knowledgable people will appreciate hardware detection.
- David Nusinow
unicode problem I have noticed is with man and/or
less where it can't display dashes correctly. At least it doesn't seem
to work out of the box.
--
David Pashley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpEdYXqG1nKo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
i've had cable
connectivity with charter.net for more than 1 year. until yesterday i've never
had need of an email acct there. i planned on using the address at charter when
the spam at my top-10 acct became unbearable. when i finally got my log-in info
for the charter acct. i logged in and
also upgrading to wxgtk-python (2.3) or de-installing
> > wxgtk-python (2.2).
>
> Sure you can. dpkg --force-depends -i python_*.deb will do it for you.
>
> If you want something bad enough, and don't mind breaking things, anything's
> possible.
Please, don'
latter happen for the cover
for their album Animals. The pig escaped though, and made it a
beautiful story.
http://www.myputney.co.uk/wandsworth/community-batterseapowerstation.htm
http://www.floydianslip.com/discs/animals.htm
/David
--
/) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Northern li
package. I am pretty sure the same
thing can be done here, though. And if its manual is licensed under the
GFDL, we'll simply have to make due without the manual, sad but true.
Or have the manual in non-free, whatever feels is most appropriate
(let's not start a discussion about removing
modutils had a set
list of directories that it looked at in /lib/moduiles/${kvers},
which included pcmcia, mtd, and rtai, all of which were for non-kernel
source module packages. Other packages (including Comedi) put their
modules in misc/, rather than bother asking for another directory. I
eventually asked
.
[snip]
Pah, let's require all maintainers to be able to fix all
translation-bugs on their own. It should be a requirement to be fluent
in all nuances of all languages to be a maintainer. Right? I mean, you
must be able to fix any bug in the package just because you NMU
a new tran
unsubscribe
true debian package in non-free, to benefit truly of the debian tools.
Yes, some (a lot of) non-free, but gratis, software do not allow
redistribution, or imposes limits on the redistribution such that it
cannot be packaged even for non-free.
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weine
g to
write...
David Nicol
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 00:16, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:32, david nicol wrote:
> > I've been trying to popularize a centralized challenge-response
> > database since last fall. It seems to me that becoming a debian
> > package maintainer for the sof
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 08:32, Russell Coker wrote:
> Here's how it works. Spammer creates account [EMAIL PROTECTED] and sends
> their first spam to a C-R system, when the challenge comes in they
> acknowledge it and from then on the C-R system does not bother them because
> they keep using the
Has anyone run into this
before?
I've already made cross compiling packages for binutils, kernel headers,
and a C library, which all use /usr/arm-linux as the base for arm
libraries & headers, and I'm currently trying to get the c++ and java
cross compilers built.
--
~
Actually after saying that, I had an epiphany. Why don't I just look at
the gcc debian package source.
Everyone can ignore that last message
David
--
David Meggy
Engineering
Technical Solutions Inc.
Unit #1 7157 Honeyman St
Delta BC Canada, V4
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 04:02, Craig Sanders wrote:
> sorry, a system that only works sometimes (or even most of the time) is a
> broken system.
>
> i prefer to know that my system's behaviour will be consistent and correct.
Shamless plug: sign up for totally spam-free forwarding address
at http:
eems to need
to do this more because it's so unintuititive. Not that dselect is bad
by any means (I often recommend using it, especially to build the
sources list) but for general everyday use, aptitude is gnenerally much
better.
- David Nusinow
#1 Thu Aug 28 16:46:35 BST 2003 i686
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David Pashley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
pgpuRPTS5y8Vc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
701 - 800 of 2449 matches
Mail list logo
