On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:43:55AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Parse error. I cannot see a connection between answer and question. > > > Life's a beach. There's all of one line in the developer's reference > > which talks about your responsibilities when doing an NMU: > > "Follow what happens, you're responsible for any bug that you introduced > > with your NMU." Now, this works fine when the official maintainer is > > going to follow up; it doesn't work worth a damn if the official > > maintainer isn't taking care of the package at all anymore. > > Why? Neither the package, nor its quality nor its state of > unmaintainedness has changed, it just has one (wishlist) bug less.
[snip] Pah, let's require all maintainers to be able to fix all translation-bugs on their own. It should be a requirement to be fluent in all nuances of all languages to be a maintainer. Right? I mean, you must be able to fix any bug in the package just because you NMU a new translation, so you better be able to fix any translation-bug if you fix a memory-leak, right? Regards: David Weinehall -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Northern lights wander (\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/
