On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:16:36PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > With the latest release, it's now down to about 80MB. In any case, we > never release with more than one old kernel, nor with experimental kernels, > so that would be 1 x 2.2.x, and at most 2 x 2.4.x.
This sucks. Hopefully not only in my opinion. But, see, I don't agree with you if you concentrate on 2.4.x kernels until 2.4.10 or better .15 is released. I felt like on an horror trip when I saw potato released with an prerelaese of a stable kernel. And please, don't use a 2.4.x kernel for wood as the standard kernel-image. But this thread's discussion ducks. It will point to nothing, if noone will suggest a solution. What's about the kernel images to be pseudopackages with special configs depending on patches and kernelsource to build a kernel live when installing it? so long... David -- __ _ | David "netzwurm" Spreen Kiel, Germany / _|___ ___| |__ __ _ _ _ | http://www.netzwurm.cc/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | _/ _ \/ _ \ '_ \/ _` | '_|| gnupg key (on keyservers): C8B6823A |_| \___/\___/_.__/\__,_|_| | CellPhone: +49 173 3874061
