If noone objects, I'll close this bug.
I wouldn't like to see Debian 1.3 delayed further because of an obsolete
"critical" bug.
Anyways, e2fsprogs seams to have a lot of open bugs. Is this package
actively maintained?
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> On May 26, Christian Schwarz wrote
> > > AFAIK there is no manual, list or whatever of debian specific things.
> > > so, what about moving all manpages that are debian related to have the
> > > suffix "debian&quo
only want to get this
documented somewhere.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian is looking [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for a logo! Have a
look at our drafts PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
at
t it here for discussion. Does
someone have any additions to the three points showed above?
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ /
\\\__/ !PGP-fp: 8F 6
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 May 1997, Brian C. White wrote:
> >
> > > 9020: e2fsprogs- fsck.ext2: can't load library 'libcom_err.so.2'
> >
> > I
inary/sources of orphaned
> packages, but also the bug reports of the dropped packages.
But please don't mix "orphaned" packages with "give-away" packages. I have
a few "give-away" packages on the list but I'll maintain these unless
someone else takes them.
ted if necessary.
Does someone know why the job isn't running?
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Don't know Perl? [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF
t our current solution is just a workaround. If dpkg/deity has this
feature implemented, I'll change the policy to the new scheme.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian is looking [EMAIL PROTE
ackages in Debian 1.3.1 (cf. current discussion
in debian-private) and mention this in the README
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ /
cond it ommits the "unknown").
(The reason we didn't choose
i386-debian-linux
is that we wanted our utilities to be compatible with other
distributions.)
Any comments, please.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
On Thu, 29 May 1997, Galen Hazelwood wrote:
> Christian Schwarz wrote:
> >
> > Next step: GNU's "configure" utility. I thought that we had agreed on
> > using
> > i386-unknown-linux
> > (and similar for the other architectures),
gt; is NOT being commercially distributed.
> Please send your contributions, bugreports, hints etc. to the
> author. Thanks !
>
> Should this go in contrib or non-free?
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
stributing it.
>
>
> Non-free it is
No. If the author forbids distribution a changed (i.e. bug fixed)
_binary_ version, I think the package may not even go into non-free.
What do the others think?
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECT
tating the reasons for this.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
On 1 Jun 1997, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Galen Hazelwood) wrote on 31.05.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 29 May 1997, Galen Hazelwood wrote:
> > > > (Don't ask me what
On 1 Jun 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
> >
> > > Non-free it is
> >
> > No. If the author forbids distribution a changed (i.e. bug fixed)
> > _binary
onality to deb-make. If it
discovers a CPAN module it could set up everything for the maintainer
automatically and he/she would just have to fill in the description, etc.)
Perhaps we should "reassign" this bug to the "debian-policy" package
instead of closing it, so that we don
". It is to be considered "unstable" :-) This manual also contains
a few sections which have not yet been approved here on debian-devel --
I'll do this in a few days.
Feel free to send me any suggestions, critics, etc.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
On Mon, 9 Jun 1997, Brian S. Julin wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > I think this naming scheme is quite reasonable. What does everyone else
> > think about it?
>
> What do you do if you do have a package turn up with an underscore
> in its name?
[I CC: this to the mailing list since I think this is of public intrest.
Hope you don't mind]
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, Brian S. Julin wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > What is your problem exactly? We could easily change our standard to
> > "c
st of the world, you don't have to wait
> those many days until your local mirror gets it all, uc?
AFAIK, there is an incoming mirror in Germany at
ftp://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/pub/debian-incoming
I'm not sure if it's still set up, though.
Cheers,
Chris
-- _,,
TOPIC!
---
The following message is a list of items to be completed for the next
version of the Debian Policy Manual. It is posted on debian-devel
periodically by the Debian Policy Manager, Christian Schwarz, to get
more feedback about certain policy issues that
st such problems with XFree 3.3 before we include this into Debian
1.3.1!
(Someone else stated that since X 3.3 is well tested, we only have to test
the "Debian packaging". This is definitely wrong then!)
Just my $0.02,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
"important" too!
If there are no objections, the quoted sentence above will get into the
next Policy Manual.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AGER to override this.
That's why we need "sensible-{editor,pager}". These are two simply shell
scripts that test if EDITOR/PAGER is set and launches either that program,
or /usr/bin/{editor,pager}.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
ction. Is this person listening?
BTW, there is also the "lockfile" command that's included in the procmail
distribution. Perhaps we could convert this into a "liblockfile" library?
Thanks (I'm really happy to get some feedback about these policy
questions, finally :
ering to "dwww" any different from the
"menu" system? Joost, perhaps you can give use some hints here (I think
Jim is offline now).
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux?[EMAIL PROTECTE
endency
resolution" screen and would tell you, that you will need a few shared
libraries, too.
I think the "sub-systems" defined by the priority levels should be
consistent and thus, a package should not depend on a package with lower
priority level, or the priority level of the latter has to be i
e is offline for about 4 weeks. So I think someone else should
grab it and upload a non-maintainer (interim) release.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian is looking [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for a lo
On 16 Jun 1997, Rob Browning wrote:
> Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This really is an _excellent_ idea! So, we just need a volunteer to
> > implement and maintain this "upstream library". (The packaging for Debian
> > should not be a
ck
and we should decide that the registering method really has to be changed,
we can simply adopt the Policy again.
Joost, is the proposed text correct?
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux?[EMAIL
the documentation
> under dwww in a way similar to the Info docs (sectioning, layout,
> etc.). Anybody some thoughts on this?
I think Jim was working on such an enhancement for dwww. We should ask him
when his is back.
Cheers,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know
e care of this please?
Guy is responsible for such things. However, he said he's offline for 4
weeks. I suggest you file this as a bug report against the package
"ftp.debian.org" so he doesn't forget about it when he cames back.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Sc
d always be mentioned in
> > the "README.debian" file, as you propose.
This field is important if the package is handed from one maintainer to
another. The second usually does not know where to get the upstream
sources! And of course, the users probably would like to know
On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
>
> > TOPIC 7: new definition of ``free software''
>
> This is only about the "main" section.
>
> In addition to that, I wonder why we are support
depends on how frequently CGI.pm is updated relative to Perl itself)
This would be called
libcgi-pm-perl
then.
Cheers,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [
Provides: X11R5, xr5shlib, aout-x11r6lib, X11R6
- --
Please tell me what you think of it. If there are no objections, these
changes will be incorporated into the next release of the Policy Manual.
Thanks,
Chris
- -- _,, Christian Schwarz
/
inted out that it would be good to maintain this library as a
new "upstream library" (non-debian specific) so that others can use it too
(on other distributions or systems). Of course, we'd need a good upstream
maintainer for that.
So, if someone is intrested to help, please contact
ile.
Or did I got your question wrong?
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC
l!
Perhaps his home page can give more info (I didn't have a look, yet).
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB
SWIG would do
> that easily enough?
I now Perl too, so I can take that part or help you with it. Someone else
around here mentioned--hey! I just discovered that the Perl code I've here
was written be you! Ok, this part seams to be ready. :-) We just have to
make sure it is compatible to o
On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
[snip]
> However, Christian Schwarz asked me to do html as well. That will be some
> work as HOWTO packages comes as tar.gz files with no surcompassing
> index.html. I'll have to do some perl hacking. No promises for the June
> r
lock/unlock/test a file.
In addition, we could create a new "lockfile" binary (just as in procmail)
that can be used by shell scripts or other programs (via "system").
We'll also provide "modules" for Perl/Python/etc.
Any comments?
(I feel like I presented thes
On 20 Jun 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Christian> This is buggy since it's not working over NFS. (I'm
> Christian> running into problems every few days sin
l to support NFS safe
locking?
A: A lot of people use Debian in a network with other UNICES. As such,
we'll have to choose a locking mechanism which is implemented at
"application level" so that the involved programs (mail daemons,
mail clients, etc.) on other platforms can be fixed to apply to our
mechanism, as we
package. Otherwise, the will have to be distributed in
seperate packages, one for each format.
Any comments?
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux?[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit
On Sat, 21 Jun 1997, Scott K. Ellis wrote:
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP DECRYPTED MESSAGE-
> On Sat, 21 Jun 1997, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Jun 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> >
> > > The documentation will be distributed via several
the documentation belongs to the package itself.
> I don't want to install another package just because I need some
> documention.
Some users from not installing the documentation. For example, I run
Debian on lots of computers here and at work. I don't want to have the
bash manual i
not sure if we can make exceptions for a "doc-only" package.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Don't know Perl? [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB
e existing Perl module if it is
compatible to this library and adopt it if necessary. This should be
packaged up, too.
Anyways, _many_ thanks for writing this lib!
Cheers,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECT
just have to
specify the limit.)
(BTW, I'm assuming that *.info.gz requires the same amount of disk space
as *.html.gz. I'm sure we find a way to use .html.gz files somehow.)
Any comments are welcome,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
major
versions? (You can't use "versions" of a virtual package, yet.)
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ /
\\\__/ !
; Motif, only *source code* compatible!
Is this true? Then there would be no reason to create the "motif-libs"
virtual packages! (The only use for them would be to allow drop-in
replacements of the compiled shared library packages.)
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
der moving to Maildir delivery as our default, with
> dot-locking as a required alternative (for backwards compatibility).
I don't know the "Maildir" locking technique yet. Could you please
describe it with a little more details?
Thanks for your input,
Chris
--
oo-doc'
> packages.
We are currently planning such a thing for our own manuals. The discussion
was on debian-doc a while ago.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux?[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EM
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Philip Hands wrote:
> > Even if we are, I'm sure it would be easier if every package `foo' had
> > one or more associated `foo-doc' packages.
>
> From: Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Sorry, Alex, I wanted to send this to you _and_ the mailing list in the
first time. So here it's again.]
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
Hi folks!
Please let me quote from my last mail, first:
> My prediction is that while a few people will like option 3) very much,
&
ce,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux?[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
http://www.debian.org http://fatman.mat
,info 68)
./tex/latex2html_96.1.h-6.deb: 651 (doc 651,info 0)
./tex/tetex-base_0.4pl8-2.deb: 647 (doc 3,info 322)
./text/lout_3.08-1.deb: 3517 (doc 3517,info 0)
./utils/ftape-2.0.30_3.03a-1.deb: 581 (doc 473,info 54)
./web/arena_1.0b3-1.deb: 701 (doc 701,info 0)
./x11/9term_1.6.6-3.deb: 551 (doc 551
;s
HTML::Parser class and is thus independent of any specific HTML tags.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian is looking [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for a logo! Have a
look at our drafts PGP-fp: 8F 61
;. I think it is pretty safe to start "lpd" on every
machine, since the default configuration would not accept queries from
foreign hosts. If I install the "lpd" package, I would not like to be
asked whether this daemon should be started!
Thanks,
Chris
--
;t "boa" be extended to uncompress "foo.html.gz" on-the-fly
when _this_ file is requested, just as "foo.html" would have been
requested and that file does not exist?
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PRO
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
>
> > "objections" this times. If you can't live with this proposal, you'll have
> > to present another formulation of a paragraph or of the whole text.
>
On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Christian Schwarz writes:
>
> > > > The situation looks completely different if the server has its own
> > > > package, like `msqld' for the server and `msql' for the client.
> > >
> > > Not
On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote:
>
> >
> >Hi!
> >
> >Christoph, please tell us why using "fixhrefgz" on "html.gz" files does
> >not work with our web servers.
>
> Pleas
suggest we revert them to 644.
>
> Is the policy editor reading this?
Yes, I am. (I initiated this thread :-)
I fully agree to Christian. If there are no objections, file permissions
will be reverted to 644.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL P
On Sun, 29 Jun 1997, Christian Meder wrote:
[snip]
> [to Christian Schwarz: Sorry, that I brought the topic up again without
> proposing better paragraphs, will try to work on a proposal in the
> coming week]
Sorry, to be so rude, but this summary does not bring us forward. Some of
yo
d the html.gz/fixhtmlgz issue completely. The
only possible way, as it seems to me, is to support a compressed
filesystem, but these are not ready for real use, yet.
Any comments? (I'm sure ;-)
Thanks,
Chris
(Debian Policy Manager)
-- Christian Schwarz
n to have the same package names).
Comments?
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 D
d to all people that gave us
feedback!
Cheers,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Don't know Perl? [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14
se libterm-readkey-perl for the Debian package.
(Why hasn't this package not been discussed on debian-devel? Or did I miss
something?)
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux?[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
;, so I
don't see a reason for not using the `-a' option. (I'd prefer the `-a'
solution over the `tar' hack since it's much easier to read.)
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian h
ra package ?
Yes, probably a good idea.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC
bian system.
Completely agreed. After all, we are working on an operating system (I
don't like the term "distribution" too much) and _not_ on a set of
packages which should compile on _any_ UNIX.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTE
m not sure if we should treat static libraries the same way, since some
people might need the symbols for debugging. Could someone comment on
that?
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian has a logo![EMAIL PR
;. In case of a new upstream version in
"hamm", the version number is taken from the new "hamm" version with
Debian revision 0, concatenated with "bo" and the Debian revision of
the "hamm" package. (I hope everyone can follow :-)
--
some pages...
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux?[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
http://www.debian.org http
s at all cost or
> whatever, but could you please give some explanaion why you think this
> way?
Please check out http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html . The page
contains several arguments against the use of "Reply-To". I fully agree to
what Ian said.
Thanks,
Chris
this
directory.
(For all that have missed the previous announcement: Debian 2.0 will use
FSSTND and we are expecting to switch over to FHS for Debian 2.1.)
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
posting.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
CS Software goe
e that they fix
> each problem that was fixed in the non-maintainer release.
>
> Perhaps this should be incorporated into our policy ?
I'll include your request in the next policy weekly posting.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PR
I've just discovered that "The MULE" is a trademark. Check out
http://www.hello.co.uk/altek/mule.html
Does this mean we could get problems if we distribute emacs20 ? If so, I
guess someone should contact RMS about that.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Ch
P daemon included in the ppp-pam
package, as it includes a more general way to specify your local
security policies.''
(Some native englisch speaker should improve this, of course :-)
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [E
il folders--or implement a compatible
mechanism.
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
! ___; [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ /
\\\__/ !PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D
l package? None. The upstream author included these for WML ports to
other (non-GNU) systems which are likely to have no m4 (or atleast a
different one).
There is already an eperl, m4, etc. package and we should use these. If
special versions are required, you could use versioned dep
The problem is that all packages are built from a single source
package (I think) and that package will have to be in non-free. Thus, we
would not have full source for the contrib packages.
We haven't decided yet how to handle this situation.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian
cessary steps to get the bo-unstable directory set up have been
performed. We have an executive decision to create that directory and we
also have a policy. I just reported a bug against "ftp.debian.org" and I
hope Guy will have time for this in the next few days.
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,,
her he/she prefers dhelp, dwww,
or both, etc.
I'm currently working on a draft for this interface. It looks like we're
going to implement that together with a new "Documentation Policy" for
Debian 2.1.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know
hear a few comments regarding the
"Immediate-Configure" solution. (Other solutions are welcomed too, of
course!)
Cheers,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian GNU/Linux?[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit
On 27 Dec 1997, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 17 Dec 1997, James Troup wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > If the binary changes, the version number should change.
> >
> > Completely agreed. Everything else wil
e time for this.)
Thanks in advance,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Don't know Perl? [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
http://ww
On Sat, 3 Jan 1998, Chris Fearnley wrote:
> 'Christian Schwarz wrote:'
> >
> >On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Chris Fearnley wrote:
> >
> >> '[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:'
> >> >
> >> >Actually, I'm not sure there is a problem with
an add them.
We need another system anyways to convert between different documentation
formats on demand. Since every online documentation has to be registered
to that system, we shouldn't we do the "menu" registration through the
same system? Everything else looks like doing the same w
On 3 Jan 1998, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > By changing the dependencies you changed the source package before,
> > or?
>
> Technically, no. The dependencies are build by dpkg-shlibdeps, so for
> all intents and p
td.
Note, that I don't know if debhelper is any better regarding the cron
policy--I hope so.
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Don't know Perl? [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit
2.1.2.0 Nov 96
* Some changes WRT shared libraries
2.1.1.0 Sep 96
* No hard links in source packages
* Do not use dpkg-divert or update-alternatives without consultation
* Shared libraries must be installed stripped
2.1.0.0
ntation
policy we could perhaps start working on the menu registry with doc-base
to get some experience in this area.
If someone wants to do this with me, just drop me a note. I'm just waiting
for volunteers...
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 03:02:38PM +0100, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> > Thus, the use of debstd is depreciated. Note, that I've removed debstd
> > from all of my packa
On 5 Jan 1998, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Christian> The solution presented in 3.3.7 is that the "owner" of
> Christian> the conffile (cron in that case)
seful to get some
"background" info about the version one has installed.
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Don't know Perl? [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
