Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: наб
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libcurlfs
Version : 0
Upstream Contact: наб
* URL : https://sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/libcurlfs
* License : 0BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: наб
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: snappy-tools
Version : 0
Upstream Contact: наб
* URL : https://sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/snappy-tools
* License : 0BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 11:39:36PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-10-20 at 20:03 +0200, наб wrote:
> > I'd like to use an epoch so I'm asking for consensus per policy 5.6.12.
> >
> > As part of the Salvage Team's trixie view-os removal plan ‒
>
https://github.com/alperakcan/fuse-ext2
instead of src:fuse-umfuse-ext2.
The current version of src:fuse-umfuse-ext2 in sid is 0.4-1.5,
and the current version of https://github.com/alperakcan/fuse-ext2 is 0.0.11,
so src:fuse-ext2 would need to be version 1:0.0.11-1 to update right.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: наб
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Control: block -1 by 1085457
* Package name: fuse-ext2
Version : 0.0.11
Upstream Contact: Alper Akcan
* URL : https://github.com/alperakcan/fuse-ext2
* License : GPL-2
Hi!
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:08:47PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 00:00:21 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 00:49 +0200, наб wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 11:39:36PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Sun,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:44:46AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:13:05PM +0200, наб wrote:
> > I've implemented this but can't test it fully because
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git
> > is missing an up-to-d
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 10:53:29PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 04:56:05PM +0200, наб wrote:
> > ...but now that I look at this there's fuse2fs,
> > which is naturally better than some third-party implementation.
> >
> > The int
imed after
https://github.com/cybernoid/archivemount/issues/29
but early 2021 is not much different to excess deaths from late 2020 :/).
Has anyone seen Yann Amar?
наб
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hing material.
I started writing this to propose some sort of hoisting,
but this no longer appears feasible. Ah well.
Best,
наб
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
src:pth has been gone from testing since August.
There are no rdeps and no rbuilddeps,
and only FTBFS bugs since like 2012.
I can hardly imagine a point to Pth at all in 2024
(or any time after ubiquitous pthread support),
so it reads to me like an easy QA removal.
But, this seems incongruent
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 11:21:00AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-11-17 at 03:22 +0100, наб wrote:
> > src:pth has been gone from testing since August.
> > There are no rdeps and no rbuilddeps,
> > and only FTBFS bugs since like 2012.
> > I can hardly imagi
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 07:29:19AM -1000, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:59PM +0200, наб wrote:
> > idk if you got a notification (the confirmation mail would indicate
> > otherwise?), but the patch is at #1085590. I've tested it to behave
> >
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 09:30:09AM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> It's worth noting that Lubuntu is currently shipping Picom by default.
> I don't think you're proposing getting rid of it, but if that ends up
> being considered, I'd prefer if it could be kept around or if the
> Lubuntu team could a
Hi!
We seem to be shipping 3.5 standalone compositors
(maintainers in CC):
1. xcompmgr ‒ the upstream's effectively finished
(we have 1.1.8, the two releases since changed nothing of
substance)
last maintainer upload 2019-07
popcon inst=852 vote=171
2. co
15 matches
Mail list logo
