Hi! I'd like to use an epoch so I'm asking for consensus per policy 5.6.12.
As part of the Salvage Team's trixie view-os removal plan ‒ RM: umview -- RoQA; obsolete, low popcon #1085454 RM: fuse-umfuse-ext2 -- RoQA; dead upstream, low popcon #1085457 + replace with https://github.com/alperakcan/fuse-ext2 RM: umview-mod-umfusefat [amd64 i386 ppc64] -- RoQA; view-os removed ITS #1085458 (2024-11-09); https://github.com/virtualsquare/fusefatfs/pull/2 RM: fuse-umfuse-iso9660 -- RoQA; dead upstream, duplicates fuseiso #1085456 + implement "fuseiso -o fuseopt -o fuseopt iso mtpt" in fuseiso #1083034 (currently only accepts "fuseiso iso mtpt -o fuseopt -o fuseopt") have that provide a transitional package (sge@ contacted thus) ‒ fuseext2 is to be provided by https://github.com/alperakcan/fuse-ext2 instead of src:fuse-umfuse-ext2. The current version of src:fuse-umfuse-ext2 in sid is 0.4-1.5, and the current version of https://github.com/alperakcan/fuse-ext2 is 0.0.11, so src:fuse-ext2 would need to be version 1:0.0.11-1 to update right. Thoughts? наб Keep me in CC please.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
