Bug#1093832: ITP: golang-github-google-logger -- Cross platform Go logging library.

2025-01-23 Thread Simon Josefsson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: golang-github-google-logger Version : 1.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Google * URL : https://github.com/google/logger * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description : Cross platf

Bug#1093833: ITP: golang-github-google-go-sev-guest -- attestation verification reporting via /dev/sev-guest

2025-01-23 Thread Simon Josefsson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: golang-github-google-go-sev-guest Version : 0.12.1-1 Upstream Author : Google * URL : https://github.com/google/go-sev-guest * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description

Bug#1093835: ITP: golang-github-google-go-configfs-tsm -- Trusted Security Module attestation reporting (library)

2025-01-23 Thread Simon Josefsson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: golang-github-google-go-configfs-tsm Version : 0.3.2-1 Upstream Author : Google * URL : https://github.com/google/go-configfs-tsm * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description

Bug#1093838: ITP: golang-github-google-go-tpm-tools -- high-level library API for using TPMs

2025-01-23 Thread Simon Josefsson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: golang-github-google-go-tpm-tools Version : 0.4.4-1 Upstream Author : Google * URL : https://github.com/google/go-tpm-tools * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description :

PCRE2 10.45~rc1-1 uploaded to experimental

2025-01-23 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, PCRE2 are preparing for the 10.45 release, and have an RC1 out. I'd like that 10.45 to make it into trixie, so I've packaged up 10.45~rc1-1 for experimental and uploaded it just now. Assuming no show-stoppers, my plan is to upload 10.45 to unstable when it's released (expected start of F

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, Otto Kekäläinen writes: > Numerous people are posting Merge Requests on Salsa. Please help review them! I'd much much rather MRs were associated with bug reports; that way I only have to remember to check one place for outstanding issues in my packages, and years down the line when I wonder

Bug#1093875: ITP: lomiri-dekko-app -- Convergent email client for Lomiri

2025-01-23 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Gabriel X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: lomiri-dekko-app Version : 0.4.1 Upstream Contact: https://gitlab.com/jonnius * URL : https://gitlab.com/dekkan/dekko/ * License : GPL-3 Programmi

+1 (Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian)

2025-01-23 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 02:28:00PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote: > I'd much much rather MRs were associated with bug reports; that way I > only have to remember to check one place for outstanding issues in my > packages, and years down the line when I wonder "why did this change get > made" I can lo

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Gioele Barabucci
On 23/01/25 15:28, Matthew Vernon wrote: Otto Kekäläinen writes: Numerous people are posting Merge Requests on Salsa. Please help review them! I'd much much rather MRs were associated with bug reports; that way I only have to remember to check one place for outstanding issues in my packages,

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Simon Josefsson
Jonas Smedegaard writes: > Quoting Gioele Barabucci (2025-01-23 15:56:24) >> On 23/01/25 15:28, Matthew Vernon wrote: >> > Otto Kekäläinen writes: >> > >> >> Numerous people are posting Merge Requests on Salsa. Please help >> >> review them! >> > >> > I'd much much rather MRs were associated w

Bug#1093887: ITP: nmo -- datalog-based rule engine nemo

2025-01-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: nmo Version : 0.7.0 Upstream Contact: Nemo developers * URL : https://knowsys.github.io/nemo-doc/ * Lic

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Matthew Vernon (2025-01-23 15:28:00) > Otto Kekäläinen writes: > > > Numerous people are posting Merge Requests on Salsa. Please help review > > them! > > I'd much much rather MRs were associated with bug reports; that way I > only have to remember to check one place for outstanding iss

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:56:24PM +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > Or forget about the BTS and accept Salsa as the main place where > improvements are discussed? As long as it's very commonly the case that nobody is actually subscribed to merge requests on Salsa, it isn't realistic to expect revi

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Gioele Barabucci (2025-01-23 15:56:24) > On 23/01/25 15:28, Matthew Vernon wrote: > > Otto Kekäläinen writes: > > > >> Numerous people are posting Merge Requests on Salsa. Please help > >> review them! > > > > I'd much much rather MRs were associated with bug reports; that way > > I only

Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?

2025-01-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Michael Tokarev, le ven. 24 janv. 2025 09:16:50 +0300, a ecrit: > 3. "latest" is a misnomer (unlike "main" or "master"). For example, I often > use > "experimental" branch which is more recent than "master", yet the main > development is happening in "master". Yes, that's why I wouldn't use

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Xiyue Deng
Hi Otto, First I want to thank you for your work on Salsa. I find it pleasant to use and the Salsa CI has also helped catch many lurking bugs for me. Otto Kekäläinen writes: > ... > > I understand that some people like to turn of the MR feature > completely on their repositories, but I would a

Bug#1093901: ITP: golang-github-google-go-tdx-guest -- wrap /dev/tdx-guest and attestation verification

2025-01-23 Thread Simon Josefsson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Simon Josefsson * Package name: golang-github-google-go-tdx-guest Version : 0.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Google * URL : https://github.com/google/go-tdx-guest * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Description :

Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?

2025-01-23 Thread Michael Tokarev
24.01.2025 04:06, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: I would be curious to hear why people are *not* adopting 'debian/latest'? Why does the majority of Debian packages still use 'master' or 'debian/master' branch as the main development branch? For me it's 3 things. 1. "debian/*" is just more to type th

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi, > Are discussions at Salsa preserved years down the line? I don't think there is any special concern to suspect that Salsa or any other official Debian service would seize to exist abruptly? GitHub.com and GitLab.com has done a pretty good job at hosting contents for years and years, hopefull

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi Matthew! > > Numerous people are posting Merge Requests on Salsa. Please help review > > them! > > I'd much much rather MRs were associated with bug reports; that way I > only have to remember to check one place for outstanding issues in my > packages, and years down the line when I wonder "wh

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! > I think it would improve collaboration a lot if we could make an effort > to get salsa projects into one of two states: > > * Merge requests are disabled for that project > > * Merge requests are actively watched at least as closely as the BTS We should revisit the decision to have email no

Bug#1093892: RFH: corectrl -- Control your computer hardware using application profiles

2025-01-23 Thread Matthias Geiger
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: corec...@packages.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, werdah...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:corectrl -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I request assistance with maintaining the corectrl package. . Since my time these days

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Otto" == Otto Kekäläinen writes: Otto> Hi, Otto> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 17:52, Wookey wrote: Otto> .. >> Right. I look at bug reports for my packages (eventually). I have >> never looked at a Salsa merge request in my life. That's just >> /dev/null for my packages.

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Wookey
On 2025-01-23 18:09 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 17:52, Wookey wrote: > .. > > Right. I look at bug reports for my packages (eventually). I have > > never looked at a Salsa merge request in my life. That's just > > /dev/null for my packages. That could change one

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* Sam Hartman [250123 23:47]: > > ... > >> > Numerous people are posting Merge Requests on Salsa. Please > >> help review them! > > I think it would improve collaboration a lot if we could make an effort > to get salsa projects into one of two states: > > * Merge requests are disabled fo

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Wookey
On 2025-01-23 17:11 +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:56:24PM +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote: > > Or forget about the BTS and accept Salsa as the main place where > > improvements are discussed? > > As long as it's very commonly the case that nobody is actually > subscribed to

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Wookey
On 2025-01-23 16:36 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I understand that some people like to turn of the MR feature > completely on their repositories, but I would advise against that, as > it is a major killer to collaboration. Not only does it signal to > contributors to the existing package that th

DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?

2025-01-23 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi! Current https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep14/ states that the default Debian branch name is 'debian/latest': > In Debian this means that uploads to unstable and experimental should be > prepared either in > the debian/latest branch or respectively in the debian/unstable and > debian

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Jonas" == Jonas Smedegaard writes: Jonas> Quoting Matthew Vernon (2025-01-23 15:28:00) >> Otto Kekäläinen writes: >> >> > Numerous people are posting Merge Requests on Salsa. Please >> help review them! >> >> I'd much much rather MRs were associated with bug

Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?

2025-01-23 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Otto" == Otto Kekäläinen writes: Otto> I would be curious to hear why people are *not* adopting Otto> 'debian/latest'? Because debian/latest is more to type and because until we adopt something I think has a chance of getting real conformity, I am far more interested in my own co

Re: DEP-14: Default branch name 'debian/latest' objections?

2025-01-23 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 24, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I would be curious to hear why people are *not* adopting 'debian/latest'? > > Why does the majority of Debian packages still use 'master' or > 'debian/master' branch as the main development branch? Because it works fine and it is the most commonly used branch

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hi, On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 17:52, Wookey wrote: .. > Right. I look at bug reports for my packages (eventually). I have > never looked at a Salsa merge request in my life. That's just > /dev/null for my packages. That could change one day, but I don't know when. Could you give it a try please? Sa

Re: Let's make 2025 a year when code reviews became common in Debian

2025-01-23 Thread Sam Hartman
Otto> Hi, >> Are discussions at Salsa preserved years down the line? Otto> confident that contents can be migrated. We already Otto> successfully migrated git.debian.org to salsa.debian.org. Actually, I think this is a lot of the problem. We did not migrate all the alioth conte