Hi Sam!
First of all thanks for your work you do as DPL, you put a lot of
energy, time and enthusiasm in it, and this is very visible!
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:57:38AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
>
>
> Holger> So to me this is more the consensus of
* Jeremy Stanley: " Re: Bits from the DPL (August 2019)" (Tue, 1 Oct 2019
20:45:35 +):
Hi,
first of all it would help a lot to identify when a new subthread is
openend and make this visible in the usual way (like this mail does). It would
increase a lot(!) the readability of Debian lists wh
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:30:58AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> first of all it would help a lot to identify when a new subthread is
> openend and make this visible in the usual way (like this mail does). It would
> increase a lot(!) the readability of Debian lists where this is an
> often encoun
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating
> separate discussion threads when the topic changes.
>
They can, I think reddit and hackernews are good at this.
That's the "tree-like" structure that I mentioned in my email.
> You will defi
Tl;DR: We're slowing down the git discussions and we all know that I owe
the project a summary there. Even I found that discussion really long
and it's taking a while to read it all for the second time.
Long form:
First, we're all agreed that the last round of Git discussions was a bit
much to
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:40:25AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Tl;DR: [...]
> Long form: [...]
nice summary. Thanks, Sam!
--
cheers,
Holger
---
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
Samuel Henrique writes:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
>> ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating
>> separate discussion threads when the topic changes.
>>
>
> They can, I think reddit and hackernews are good at this.
> That's the "tree-like" structure that I men
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:37:58PM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> > ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating
> > separate discussion threads when the topic changes.
> >
>
> They can, I think reddit and hackernews are good at this.
>
On 2019-10-02 10:51:22 -0300 (-0300), Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:37:58PM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 10:48, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> >
> > > ...BTW no discussion tool can help in automating
> > > separate discussion threads when the topic chang
Hello,
On Tue 01 Oct 2019 at 12:22PM -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Sean" == Sean Whitton writes:
>
> Sean> You might separate your detailed, narrative descriptions of
> Sean> how discussions went from what you took away from the
> Sean> discussions. You could either drop the forme
Hello,
On Wed 02 Oct 2019 at 11:30AM +02, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> first of all it would help a lot to identify when a new subthread is
> openend and make this visible in the usual way (like this mail does). It would
> increase a lot(!) the readability of Debian lists where this is an
> often enco
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Santiago Ruano Rincón"
* Package name: altair
Version : 3.2.0
Upstream Author : Jake Vanderplas, Brian Granger, the UW Interactive Data
Lab, et al.
* URL : https://altair-viz.github.io/
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Progra
Hi Sam,
I've been following most of this list threads since last
Christmas. Sometimes it's been exhausting but oftentimes
I learnt a lot. I usually don't participate because I sense
there's not much I can add that feels worth the time it
takes for me to carefully write a message.
> People gave so
Hi,
Back in the beginning of September, because I needed to run VirtualBox
on Debian 10, I created an unofficial backport of the Debian unstable,
published it[1], and mentioned it on [2] (I don't think it was
advertised elsewhere).
[1] https://people.debian.org/~lucas/virtualbox-buster/
[2] https
Hi Lucaus,
> Given that backports are a no-go, I hope that
> http://fasttrack.debian.net/ will make quick progress and turn into an
> official service soon.
basically a good idea, but
- what are your requirements for packages that are being uploaded there?
- how do you want to avoid that this ser
Just few answers derived from common sense:
On Thursday, 3 October 2019 7:23:41 AM AEST Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> - how do you want to avoid that this service becomes a mess?
We don't have a perfect solution for this problem in the official backports
either. Sometimes there is just enough time, or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nicholas D Steeves
Control: block -1 by #840248
Package name: grub-btrfs
Version : 4.1
Upstream Author : Antynea
URL : https://github.com/Antynea/grub-btrfs
License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: bash
Description : GRUB entr
(re-sent due to incorrect CC address in last post)
Hi NOKUBI,
Thank you for working on this.
Although it may sound boring or even frustrating, data used for training
machine learning models, or pre-trained machine learning models
should be carefully dealt with.
Your copyright file is not complete
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: TANIGUCHI Takaki
* Package name: python-crayons
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Kenneth Reitz
* URL : https://github.com/MasterOdin/crayons
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Text UI colors
19 matches
Mail list logo
