Hello, On Tue 01 Oct 2019 at 12:22PM -04, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Sean" == Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes: > > Sean> You might separate your detailed, narrative descriptions of > Sean> how discussions went from what you took away from the > Sean> discussions. You could either drop the former, or put it in a > Sean> "read this if you want more details" section. > > I've found that if you do that, people get surprised and upset when it > is not obvious how you got to a decision. Basically I've found that > enough people are upset without a narrative that you get much more > overall mail and less confidence in the process without. That's fair enough. > I do organize my mail so people can skip sections, and I do try to > consistently put the conclusions after the narrative. Okay, cool -- I must admit that I have not readily been able to observe you doing that, so perhaps the distinction between the two kinds of text could be made more pronounced. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
