On 12/27/2013 09:44 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Vincent Bernat's message of 2013-12-25 09:52:40 -0800:
>> ❦ 25 décembre 2013 12:41 CET, Clint Byrum :
>>
> Don't you think it would be more reasonable if the mariadb-client
> contained a Provides: mysql-client, rather than changin
Hello everybody,
the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
How about allowing a "Testsuite" field to replace the "XS-Testsuite" field?
If people like the idea, I can send a patch to dpkg if needed.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
--
Package: wnpp
Owner: tak...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-botocore
Version : 0.29.0
Upstream Author : Mitch Garnaat
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/boto/botocore
* License : MIT
Description :
A low-level interface to a growing number o
Package: wnpp
Owner: tak...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-rsa
Version : 3.1.2
Upstream Author : Sybren A. Stuvel
* URL or Web page : http://stuvel.eu/rsa
* License : Apache
Description : Python-RSA is a pure-Python RSA implementation. It
supports
Package: wnpp
Owner: tak...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-bcdoc
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Author : Mitch Garnaat
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/botocore/bcdoc
* License : Apache
Description : Tools to help document botocore-based project
[Offlist]
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I would welcome something like "The maintainer
> decides, and can be overruled by the Technical Comittee if needed".
That is what we have now, as usual other contributors will obviously
question decisions made where they consider
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
> > the unpredictability of when a source package goes to NEW (that is,
> > when the list of binary packages changes),
>
> That is entirely predictable and under the control of the Debian
> package maintainer since it only changes when the maintainer updates
>
Package: wnpp
Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libkeyword-simple-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Lukas Mai
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Keyword-Simple
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 17:42 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Ben Hutchings's message of 2013-12-25 04:32:01 -0800:
> > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 03:41 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Vincent Bernat's message of 2013-12-25 03:36:30 -0800:
> > > > ❦ 25 décembre 2013 08:27 CET, Tho
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> [Offlist]
Only not...
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > I would welcome something like "The maintainer
> > decides, and can be overruled by the Technical Comittee if needed".
>
> That is what we have now, as usua
Steve Langasek dixit:
>of GPLv3, and explicitly did not. In fact, the system library exception is
>now defined even more narrowly than for GPLv2, so that it now covers only
>language runtime libraries. I think this was a poor choice on the FSF's
Is it really?
| A "Standard Interface" means an
Excerpts from Ben Hutchings's message of 2013-12-27 02:38:45 -0800:
> On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 17:42 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Ben Hutchings's message of 2013-12-25 04:32:01 -0800:
> > > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 03:41 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > > Excerpts from Vincent Bernat's mess
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2013-12-27 00:36:49 -0800:
> On 12/27/2013 09:44 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Vincent Bernat's message of 2013-12-25 09:52:40 -0800:
> >> ❦ 25 décembre 2013 12:41 CET, Clint Byrum :
> >>
> > Don't you think it would be more reasonable if t
Samuel Thibault debian.org> writes:
> > Isn’t there a GRUB2 port for Xen now?
>
> Yes, and it will be part of the grub2 source code, but that's not
> released yet.
But it’s in Debian already (which is where I saw it before writing
the above posting):
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/gru
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the software-center package. Or
killing it.
I don't have enough days (or weeks?) to get a new upstream version
working.
The package description is:
The Software Center lets you browse and install thousands of
free application
Hi!
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:41:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
>
> How about allowing a "Testsuite" field to replace the "XS-Testsuite" field?
Last time this came up here, it didn't look like we got consensus on
whether the fie
Hi Raphael,
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
What's unpredictable is that your package might be refused not for the
addition of the NEW binary but for because debian/copyright is not good
enough for current standards of the ftpmasters while it was ok at the time
it got accepted the fi
On 27 December 2013 16:35, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:41:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
>>
>> How about allowing a "Testsuite" field to replace the "XS-Testsuite" field?
>
> Last time this came up he
On 2013-12-27 17:35, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 17:41:26 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> the use of autopkgtest as documented in DEP 8 is taking momentum.
>>
>> How about allowing a "Testsuite" field to replace the "XS-Testsuite" field?
>
> Last time this came up here, i
* Russ Allbery [131224 01:42]:
> On the contrary, it's Debian's insistence on following an idiosyncratic
> license interpretation that's creating the supposed unfairness. This is
> obviously not Red Hat's fault.
Could you please stop using that word "idiosyncratic". How about
using "interpretati
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I would welcome clearer rules to decide what is strictly required to be built
> from source. In particular, I would welcome something like "The maintainer
> decides, and can be overruled by the Technical Comittee if needed". What
> follows
"Bernhard R. Link" writes:
> * Russ Allbery [131224 01:42]:
>> On the contrary, it's Debian's insistence on following an idiosyncratic
>> license interpretation that's creating the supposed unfairness. This
>> is obviously not Red Hat's fault.
> Could you please stop using that word "idiosyncr
Hello List,
I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically
contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of
my predecessor. Meanwhile, kfreebsd support emerged.
As FireHOL is meant to manage iptables, it is de facto meant for linux:
http://qa.debian.org/de
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:29:09PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I would welcome clearer rules to decide what is strictly required to be
> > built
> > from source. In particular, I would welcome something like "The maintainer
> > decide
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List,
> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically
> contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of
> my predecessor. Meanwhile, kfreebsd support emerged.
> As FireHOL is meant to
Hi,
thanks for the reply.
On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello List,
>
>> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically
>> contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of
>>
Jerome BENOIT writes:
> On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> The package already depends on the architecture-dependent iptables, and
>> is therefore uninstallable on kfreebsd. So there doesn't seem to be
>> any harm to having the package be Architecture: all.
> Will setting Architecture
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:02:49PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> thanks for the reply.
> On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> >> Hello List,
> >> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically
> >> conta
Hello Again,
On 27/12/13 21:17, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:02:49PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> thanks for the reply.
>
>> On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
>
I am maintainin
Le Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 02:47:46PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
>
> We do always look for new members of the ftpteam, please refer to
> Ganneff's postings to all sorts of mailing lists on how to join the team.
> It's quite an important team, and more help is always welcome.
Hi Paul,
if it i
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 06:44:41AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> So, shall we contact Lucas to tell him the good news that there is a new
> member
> in the FTP team ?
There's a bit of process and no one gets rights right away.
I'm not the one who makes these decisions, I just work on the team.
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libdata-swap-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Matthijs van Duin
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Data-Swap
* Licen
Package: wnpp
Owner: gregor herrmann
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libdata-swap-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Matthijs van Duin
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Data-Swap
* Licen
Dear FTP team,
I would like to help processing the NEW queue.
You can see at the following URL some of the reviews that I did in the past as
part of my "peer review" proposal.
- https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview
-
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=one-copyright-review;use
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Mònica Ramírez wrote:
===
> MiniDebConf 2014 Barcelona Call for Proposals
> ===
>
> Debian Women is proud to announce that it will hold a MiniDebConf
> in Barcelona on 15-16
Pau Garcia i Quiles (2013-12-27):
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Mònica Ramírez wrote:
>
> ===
> > MiniDebConf 2014 Barcelona Call for Proposals
> > ===
> >
> > Debian Women is proud to announce that it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-bioc-biomart
Version : 2.18.0
Upstream Author : Steffen Durinck
* URL :
http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/biomaRt.html
* License : Artistic-2.0
Programming Lang: R
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The firmware-linux-free maintainer has verified that identical binaries
> can be built from source, but as you well know not all of the required
> cross-compilers are packaged in Debian.
Does that mean that firmware-linux-free should move to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-bioc-rtracklayer
Version : 1.22.0
Upstream Author : Michael Lawrence
* URL :
http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/rtracklayer.html
* License : Artistic-2.0
Programming Lan
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 02:38:50PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Steve Langasek dixit:
>
> >of GPLv3, and explicitly did not. In fact, the system library exception is
> >now defined even more narrowly than for GPLv2, so that it now covers only
> >language runtime libraries. I think this was a
On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 08:11 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > The firmware-linux-free maintainer has verified that identical binaries
> > can be built from source, but as you well know not all of the required
> > cross-compilers are packaged in D
concerning: older AMD64 computers + 3.x kernel,
X11 + native NVidia drivers + FVWM or WMII,
and some other SIGSEGV'ing apps
Good morning,
the following case made me put debian 7.3 aside and keep using debian 6.0.7:
I am using an older AMD64 AthlonXP Core 2 3800+, accompa
On 12/25/2013 12:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2013-12-23 23:38:15 -0800:
>> On 12/24/2013 12:04 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>> This is self-inflicted damage, and I think it's slightly arrogant to
>>> pretend that Debian is the only organization which cares abo
43 matches
Mail list logo
