On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello List,
> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically > contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of > my predecessor. Meanwhile, kfreebsd support emerged. > As FireHOL is meant to manage iptables, it is de facto meant for linux: > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=firehol (bottom) > Therefore, may I restrict Architecture to linux-any ? You *may* do so, but why bother? The package already depends on the architecture-dependent iptables, and is therefore uninstallable on kfreebsd. So there doesn't seem to be any harm to having the package be Architecture: all. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
