Hi, thanks for the reply.
On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello List, > >> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically >> contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of >> my predecessor. Meanwhile, kfreebsd support emerged. >> As FireHOL is meant to manage iptables, it is de facto meant for linux: >> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=firehol (bottom) >> Therefore, may I restrict Architecture to linux-any ? > > You *may* do so, but why bother? Because debcheck complains. The package already depends on the > architecture-dependent iptables, and is therefore uninstallable on kfreebsd. > So there doesn't seem to be any harm to having the package be Architecture: > all. > Will setting Architecture to linux-all create more harm ? Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52bddce9.3060...@rezozer.net
