]] "Andrej N. Gritsenko"
> That is no case for open software as you still have no money from it,
> whether would you fix the bugs or not, therefore will someone use it
> beside you or not, it still will be for your own fun.
You seem to be confusing «open software» (sic) with non-commercial
softw
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 00:38:32 +0100, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>On Nov 02, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Seems like the right solution is to wait for the network device to be
>> fully up in the init script with a sleep loop... though that's
>> certainly not optimal.
>Maybe for the time being it
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:24:55 +0100, martin f krafft
wrote:
>The reason is that by the time bind() is called, the IPv6 address
>(configured with /e/n/i inet6 static, which unbound should listen
>on) is not yet ready, but "tentative", so the bind() call fails.
Last time when I asked a question along
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 02:37:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> At least with open source software, a third path (besides working around
> the bug or switching to some other software) also exists: you can help.
> That's not always practical, but at least it's *possible*.
Not all problems are things
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 10:29:50PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> If there are specific issues which cannot be expressed by bug reports
> (e.g. because they affect more than one package), by all means raise
> them here one by one.
"You can't publish a (dynamically linked) binary that can be used on
2012/11/3 Jonathan Nieder :
> Hi Karol,
>
> Karol Szkudlarek wrote:
>
>> I'm Debian/Ubuntu/Linux enthusiasts which loves using free operating
>> systems on my machines, but today in 2012 I'm struggling with many
>> problems with setup/tunning my Dell Latitude E6510 and Ubuntu and I
>> have some tho
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 04:01:03PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> "You can't publish a (dynamically linked) binary that can be used on most
> user systems"
> "You cannot make all your GUI software look the same"
The information density and/or applicability of those statements is too
low to use
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:03:37PM +0100, Karol Szkudlarek wrote:
> > Karol Szkudlarek wrote:
> >> today in 2012 I'm struggling with many
> >> problems with setup/tunning my Dell Latitude E6510 and Ubuntu
> Currently my laptop works under Ubuntu
> I don't know where are also Debian specific
> Secon
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Sébastien Villemot"
User: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: field..mathematics
Control: block 691912 by -1
* Package name: double-conversion
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Florian Loitsch
* URL : http://double-con
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> * Package name: double-conversion
libjs-double-conversion would be more appropriate, since
this is a javascript library. double-conversion is too
generic.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Li
Roger Leigh writes:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>>
>> * Package name: double-conversion
>
> libjs-double-conversion would be more appropriate, since
> this is a javascript library. double-conversion is too
> generic.
It's actually written in C++, n
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:41:13PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 04:01:03PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > "You can't publish a (dynamically linked) binary that can be used on most
> > user systems"
> > "You cannot make all your GUI software look the same"
>
> The inf
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:08:18PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Roger Leigh writes:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> >>
> >> * Package name: double-conversion
> >
> > libjs-double-conversion would be more appropriate, since
> > this is a javas
Roger Leigh writes:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:08:18PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> Roger Leigh writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> >>
>> >> * Package name: double-conversion
>> >
>> > libjs-double-conversion would be more appropr
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 10:18 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:24:55 +0100, martin f krafft
> wrote:
> >The reason is that by the time bind() is called, the IPv6 address
> >(configured with /e/n/i inet6 static, which unbound should listen
> >on) is not yet ready, but "tentative", so
also sprach Ben Hutchings [2012.11.03.2027 +0100]:
> Whyever not? You can get a socket bound to a non-local address
> even without this option, if the address is removed after you
> bind. The restriction to current local addresses is only a sanity
> check which may or may not be useful.
You are
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 02:37:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> At least with open source software, a third path (besides working
>> around the bug or switching to some other software) also exists: you
>> can help. That's not always practical, but at least it's *pos
also sprach Marc Haber [2012.11.04.1013 +0100]:
> >Maybe for the time being it will be easier and safer to have ifupdown
> >wait until DAD is finished?
>
> How does one find out about that?
% ip -6 addr show dev eth0 | grep "2001:db8::deb1:46.* tentative"
inet6 2001:db8::deb1:46/64 scope gl
It looks like we have already 68 packages in the Debian archive shipping
autopkgtest [1] tests, which is great! But unfortunately only 3 of them
declare the presence of the testsuite adding the recommended [2]
"XS-Testsuite: autopkgtest" header to their source stanza in
debian/control.
The dd-lis
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 06:26:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Marc Haber [2012.11.04.1013 +0100]:
> > >Maybe for the time being it will be easier and safer to have ifupdown
> > >wait until DAD is finished?
> > How does one find out about that?
> % ip -6 addr show dev eth0 | gre
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 07:01:12PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> It looks like we have already 68 packages in the Debian archive shipping
> autopkgtest [1] tests, which is great! But unfortunately only 3 of them
> declare the presence of the testsuite adding the recommended [2]
> "XS-Testsuit
Hola quiero aprender a manejar Linux, que distribución me recomendaría, Debian,
Ubuntu, o Opensuse.
Me compre un libro de Linux, que era un plagio de otro libro de internet de
otro autor, allí hablaba de CentOS, pero lei luego que CentOS, es mas para
servidores. ¿Ud que me recomendaría?
Leí qu
Steve Langasek (04/11/2012):
> Is there a way to get an event-based notification of this change, so
> ifupdown can listen for such an event rather than having to poll?
TL;DR: I think so.
I don't know anything about the linux kernel
Looking at net/ipv6/addrconf.c we have for examples:
add_addr
also sprach Steve Langasek [2012.11.04.1921 +0100]:
> Is there a way to get an event-based notification of this change, so
> ifupdown can listen for such an event rather than having to poll?
I experimented with ip-monitor(8), which supposedly dumps RTNETLINK,
but it remained silent on the clearin
❦ 4 novembre 2012 19:21 CET, Steve Langasek :
>> > How does one find out about that?
>
>> % ip -6 addr show dev eth0 | grep "2001:db8::deb1:46.* tentative"
>> inet6 2001:db8::deb1:46/64 scope global tentative
>
>> Once DAD completes, the "tentative" goes away.
>
>> Programatically, I think
also sprach Vincent Bernat [2012.11.04.2033 +0100]:
> Trying with "ip monitor addr", it seems that the netlink notification is
> sent once the tentative flags has been removed.
You are right. I have now removed the tomato from my eyes.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft Related projects:
: :'
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 19:48 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steve Langasek (04/11/2012):
> > Is there a way to get an event-based notification of this change, so
> > ifupdown can listen for such an event rather than having to poll?
>
> TL;DR: I think so.
>
> I don't know anything about the linux
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name : dnscrypt-proxy
Version: 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Frank Denis
URL : http://dnscrypt.org
License: ISC
Description : A
debian gnome-edition - ok
debian kde-edition - ok
debian lxde-edition - ok
debian xfce-edition - ok
when will debian mate-edition?
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:57:35AM +0400, Виталий Короневич wrote:
> debian gnome-edition - ok
> debian kde-edition - ok
> debian lxde-edition - ok
> debian xfce-edition - ok
> when will debian mate-edition?
When someone (you?) does the work to package (the relevant parts of) mate.
--
Copyshops
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 02:57 +0400, Виталий Короневич wrote:
> debian gnome-edition - ok
> debian kde-edition - ok
> debian lxde-edition - ok
> debian xfce-edition - ok
> when will debian mate-edition?
what for? the ones above are enough imho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@list
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:57:35AM +0400, Виталий Короневич wrote:
> debian gnome-edition - ok
> debian kde-edition - ok
> debian lxde-edition - ok
> debian xfce-edition - ok
Those aren't really editions comparable to Ubuntu's editions or
Fedora's spins. You just install a regular Debian and choos
Hello Andrei and all,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:24:59 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> The discussion about ITO made me think: wouldn't it make more sense to
> also have RFH, RFA, and O filled against the package itself and not
> wnpp? One has to be quite familiar with Debian to check wnpp for RFH,
33 matches
Mail list logo
