On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:08:18PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> writes: > > > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > >> > >> * Package name : double-conversion > > > > libjs-double-conversion would be more appropriate, since > > this is a javascript library. double-conversion is too > > generic. > > It's actually written in C++, not JS, so I don't think the libjs prefix > is appropriate. > > The name "double-conversion" is taken from upstream, but I agree that it > is quite generic. I don't have any better idea, but suggestions are > welcome.
Sorry, misread the description there. In that case, libdoubleconversion would be better for the binary packages (though the source package name doesn't need changing). -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121104122410.gh14...@codelibre.net
