Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
> > * Package name: pthsem
>
> Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the existing pth
> package? Else you'll have to share the Debian patches.
The situation with GNU pth is:
* pth in debian
On 19/01/2010 00:47, Russell Coker wrote:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/pfenwick/363199868/
>
> I believe that he is currently at LCA in NZ, so any DDs at LCA might want to
> speak to him about it. The above URL has a recent picture of him.
Are you sure?
Uploaded on January 19, 2007
by p...@c
Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
> > > * Package name: pthsem
> >
> > Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the existing pth
> > package? Else you'll have to s
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > I believe that he is currently at LCA in NZ, so any DDs at LCA might want
> > to speak to him about it. The above URL has a recent picture of him.
>
> Are you sure?
>
> Uploaded on January 19, 2007
> by p...@cpan
Yes, he told me he was attending
On 19/01/2010 12:40, Russell Coker wrote:
> Yes, he told me he was attending LCA. That photo was just one of the first
> hits on a Google image search.
Ok, those were two unrelated facts :) I though you saw the picture and
deduced that he was at lca 2010.
Sorry for misunderstanding.
Cheers,
--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: tex packages
Version:
Upstream Author: [NAME ]
URL: [http://example.com]
License: [GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.]
Description: [DES
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefano Rivera
* Package name: ibid
Version : 0+bzr849
Upstream Author : The Ibid Developers
* URL : http://ibid.omnia.za.net/
* License : GPL (mostly MIT/X as well)
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Multi-
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit :
>> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> > Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
>> > > * Package name : pthsem
>> >
[..]
>
> The problem is that people know pth, but
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul McEnery
* Package name: slimrat
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Přemek Vyhnal
Upstream Author : Tim Besard
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/slimrat/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Perl
Description :
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > * Package name: pthsem
> > > Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the
> > > existing pth p
Hi,
it seems that some buildds occasionally have libssl-dev installed in
their chroot. A friend of mine has found out that the netatalk package
depends on libssl0.9.8 [sparc] in sid and [hppa, mipsel] in squeeze.
Other architectures are not affected. For GPL-licensed software like
netatalk this is
Fabian Greffrath writes:
> it seems that some buildds occasionally have libssl-dev installed in
> their chroot. A friend of mine has found out that the netatalk package
> depends on libssl0.9.8 [sparc] in sid and [hppa, mipsel] in squeeze.
> Other architectures are not affected. For GPL-licensed
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This is a bug in the netatalk Debian packaging. You cannot assume the
> package will be built in a clean chroot; among other things, the buildd
> software explicitly does not guarantee that all packages will be removed.
>
Would it b
Hi Neil,
On Tue Jan 19, 2010 at 22:29:25 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > This is a bug in the netatalk Debian packaging. You cannot assume the
> > package will be built in a clean chroot; among other things, the buildd
> > software
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre Rossi
* Package name: remotepad-server
Version : 1.10
Upstream Author : Kawamoto Yosihisa
* URL : http://www.tenjin.org/RemotePad/
* License : GPL and BSD-like
Programming Lang: C
Description : Server
Neil McGovern writes:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> This is a bug in the netatalk Debian packaging. You cannot assume the
>> package will be built in a clean chroot; among other things, the buildd
>> software explicitly does not guarantee that all packages wi
On 19/01/10 at 14:36 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil McGovern writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> This is a bug in the netatalk Debian packaging. You cannot assume the
> >> package will be built in a clean chroot; among other things, the buildd
> >>
Hi,
On Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> we already have two or three buildds doing that... The buildd team (esp.
> HE) working on that and if it works out to be stable enough, we can see
> if we can roll out it to all buildds.
very cool. thank you!
cheers,
Holger
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 19/01/10 at 14:36 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Well, I would argue that proper package builds in dirty environments is
>> something we want in Debian anyway, and while this isn't the ideal
>> method to find it, it would be a bug regardless of how the buildds
>> worked
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:40:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Why would we want that?
>
> > I mean, it's very difficult to guarantee that packages build correctly
> > in dirty envs. I don't really see the point of enforcing that when we
> > have the technology (pbuilder, sbuild + lvm snap
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 00:48:15 +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> hu? since when do we have a broader interest in people patching
> and rebuilding packages? I know that there are *some* people interested
> in that (me included) but I don't see that a broader
> audience wants to support that.
>
Patrick Schoenfeld writes:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:40:22PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Because we want our users to be able to patch and rebuild our software
>> to suit their needs. Asking them to set up a chroot build environment
>> is asking quite a lot.
> hu? since when do we have a b
On 19/01/10 at 16:04 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> People do occasionally test whether packages rebuild properly in dirty
> >> environments and file bugs when they don't. Being absolutely certain it
> >> will always work is, of course, hard, but I think fixing the bug when we
> >> detect it is t
Dear all,
I would like to ask on this list a question I asked to the FTP team last
December, and for which I have not received answer yet.
Is tabular data in a binary format that can be read, written, modified and
exported using free software acceptable for Debian, or shall we contact the
upstrea
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 19/01/10 at 16:04 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
People do occasionally test whether packages rebuild properly in
dirty environments and file bugs when they don't. Being absolutely
certain it will always work is, of course, hard, but I think fixing
the
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> There are two ways to attack that problem:
how about the compromise and doing both, except that for (1) we file the bugs
with severity important?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message par
Charles Plessy writes:
> Is tabular data in a binary format that can be read, written, modified
> and exported using free software acceptable for Debian, or shall we
> contact the upstream author to check if he used an intermediate format
> (be it text, or binary like .odt or .xls) and require th
On 20/01/10 at 01:49 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > There are two ways to attack that problem:
>
> how about the compromise and doing both, except that for (1) we file the bugs
> with severity important?
There are a lot of more useful QA tas
28 matches
Mail list logo
