Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> writes:
> Is tabular data in a binary format that can be read, written, modified
> and exported using free software acceptable for Debian, or shall we
> contact the upstream author to check if he used an intermediate format
> (be it text, or binary like .odt or .xls) and require the addition of
> this file to the source, or shall we provide a text export?
I can't speak for the Debian ftpmaster team, but I would think the usual
guideline applies: We should seek “the preferred form of the work for
making modifications to it”[0] as the source form of the work.
So, if upstream uses some canonical form of the tabular data for making
modifications to it, that should be in the source package.
[0] Licensing wonks will recognise this as a definition from the GPL.
Regardless of the license for a given work, that definition is a
useful one that, IMO, makes the right distinction on what is and is
not the source of a work.
--
\ “I do not believe in immortality of the individual, and I |
`\ consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no |
_o__) superhuman authority behind it.” —Albert Einstein, letter, 1953 |
Ben Finney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
