Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > > Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit : > > > * Package name : pthsem > > > > Mmm, could this perhaps rather be just a patch added to the existing pth > > package? Else you'll have to share the Debian patches. > > The situation with GNU pth is:
I guessed so, but still. The problem is that people know pth, but they don't know pthsem (yet). It will be a long time before people discover that there is a new interesting pthsem package that basically does the same as pth with quite a few extra features, is not dead etc. Why not just replacing the existing pth package with pthsem to avoid that delay? Were I Martin Kögler, I'd even just request GNU to become the new maintainer of pth. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
