Le jeudi 13 août 2009 à 00:51 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> If there are people not managing their Standards Versions fields
> like they are supposed to, and are too lazy or incompetent to keep
> track of a simple version, I suggest we start thinking about removing
> DD status from
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> I do not have a strong opinion about this, apart from the fact
> >> that it must be present in the sources when someone is looking to
> >> update the package, an
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If there are people not managing their Standards Versions fields
> like they are supposed to, and are too lazy or incompetent to keep
> track of a simple version, I suggest we start thinking about removing
> DD status from people based on a
On 2009-08-13, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> track of a simple version, I suggest we start thinking about removing
> DD status from people based on a track record of incompetence.
Yes please.
But looking at S-V as a primary factor here is not the right thing.
More like "frequently introduces rc b
Raphael Hertzog writes:
>> BTW also Maintainer and Uploader fiels are uselessly exported.
>
> Same here, they are used. While in stable the info might not be up-to-date,
> in sid it does and those infos are used by the PTS.
What about exposing them in the Source file for /unstable/ *only*, and
l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond
* Package name: minbif
Version : 1.0alpha~git20090813
Upstream Author : Romain Bignong
* URL : http://symlink.me/projects/show/minbif
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Use lib
On 2009-08-13 11:32:17 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Not having anything to do with Ubuntu, I don't know anything about the
> details, but they have had automatic debug packages and automated
> crash report stuff for quite a while, a couple of years IIRC. The
> specs for that are here:
>
> https://lau
Le Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:22:45PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> ? I just use zless on that file and stop reading when I get to the
> current Standards-Version of the package, but that would automate it.
>
> This is, indeed, exactly the use of the Standards-Version field that both
> Manoj an
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hm, that's interesting, but I suspect that few enough of our users will be
> able to use such a thing that we shouldn't let that influence any other
> design choices. Most shares are not going to be able to be mounted
> through firewalls, for example, so that form of the debu
On 2009-08-13, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Ah, and it looks like the automated crash reporting offers to download the
>> -dbgsym packages and install them.
> Reading the spec, it seems to me that the primary motivation was
> for users to provide crash dumps with bug reports, and not much s
[Cc-ing Ayman]
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:46, Rince wrote:
>> Ayman Negm is the maintainer of, among others, the gddrescue package.
>> The package hasn't been touched by him since 2006, and several bugs
>> about it have required NMUs by other people.
> Ayman is been tracked
Hi all,
I'm going to orphan Ayman's packages.
If and when he'll come back he can upload the package closing the O
bugs, and/or ask comaintainershp for the packages that someone else
would have taken.
Regards,
Sandro
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:38, Michael Prokop wrote:
> [Cc-ing Ayman]
>
> Sandro
Hi!
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 11:15:37 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
> > > BTW also Maintainer and Uploader fiels are uselessly exported.
> >
> > Same here, they are used. While in stable the info might not be up-to-date,
> > in sid it does and those infos are used by the P
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
>
>> There will still be a repository with all the .ddebs.
>
> And aptitude and dpkg will know how to install ddebs, somehow?
> and synaptic, etc?
Yes, dpkg, apt-get, aptitude and synaptic all work perfectly
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:58:45 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
>> If that bothers you, you can use the share we plan to provide.
>>
> I'd like to still be able to debug offline, thank you very much. So far
> you've avoided answering the question, though: why one d
Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:58:45AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Roger Leigh wrote:
>>> This fails to address the rather valid concern brought up about
>>> having different versions of libraries and binaries installed
>>> from the same source package. Having one .dde
On Thu, Aug 13 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> If there are people not managing their Standards Versions fields
>> like they are supposed to, and are too lazy or incompetent to keep
>> track of a simple version, I suggest we start thinking a
On Thu, Aug 13 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2009-08-13, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> track of a simple version, I suggest we start thinking about removing
>> DD status from people based on a track record of incompetence.
>
> Yes please.
>
> But looking at S-V as a primary factor here is not the
Hello thread! /me puts on a package manager developer hat.
Sorry, I haven't read the whole thread, it's huge.
I think that diversion of debug packages out of current deb format is a
completely wrong direction. Do you want to teach all tools that get some info
about Debian packages that there is n
We are pleased to announce the availability of the following customer lists:
Siebel
Microsoft Sharepoint
Lotus Connections
Primavera
Microsoft Project
ATG
Websphere Commerce
Netsuite
Click Commerce
Sterling Commerce
Biztalk
FRX
CRM
System Center
Visual Studio
VAR
If you would li
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Hello thread! /me puts on a package manager developer hat.
>
> Sorry, I haven't read the whole thread, it's huge.
>
> I think that diversion of debug packages out of current deb format is a
> completely wrong direction. Do you want to teach all tools that get some inf
On Thu, Aug 13 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Yes, dpkg, apt-get, aptitude and synaptic all work perfectly fine.
The debug command addresses my concerns here.
> As I've said, there will still be a debug archive. I don't see what's
> the problem with providing *both* an archive an
Russ Allbery wrote:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptElfDebugSymbols is the specification. It does
> use *.ddeb. There isn't any clear statement about how *.ddeb packages
> differ from *.deb packages. It looks like, by and large, they don't,
> except they may not need to contain the same set of thin
Romain Beauxis (13/08/2009):
> Le jeudi 13 août 2009 00:09:09, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> > Romain Beauxis (12/08/2009):
> > > Is it foolish to propose this as a lintian check ? "Hey, standards
> > > version is outdated, here are the changes that ought to be done"
> >
> > checks/standards-vers
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Hello thread! /me puts on a package manager developer hat.
>>
>> Sorry, I haven't read the whole thread, it's huge.
>>
>> I think that diversion of debug packages out of current deb format is a
>> completely wrong direction. Do you want
Philipp Kern writes:
> And I have to agree with Emilio that I don't see the point of a 1:1
> relationship of ddeb to binary package just for the sake of library
> transitions. I wonder if we could just unpack the debugging build-id
> objects to some other location than globally and point gdb to
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptElfDebugSymbols is the specification. It
>> does use *.ddeb. There isn't any clear statement about how *.ddeb
>> packages differ from *.deb packages. It looks like, by and large, they
>> don't, except they may n
hello dd.
1- can i use 'piuparts' within 'pbuilder'?
2- is required use 'piuparts' in order to upload a package?
i'm not sure .. waiting
;)
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christine Spang
* Package name: libtest-script-run-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : sunnavy
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Script-Run/
* License : Perl (GPL-1+ | Artistic)
Programming Lang: Perl
Descri
Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote:
> hello dd.
>
> 1- can i use 'piuparts' within 'pbuilder'?
You should be able to, but I guess it takes *way* tooo much time to be useful.
Have a look at the pbuilder hook examples in /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples -
they do some minimal testing and are what I definit
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If you think one should address content, and specific actions,
> not personalities, your message does tend to inject personalities into
> the discussion. Please cease doing so.
Well, why are mentioning the topic of removing DD status to inco
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:04:31AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12 2009, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:10:43AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 12 2009, Neil Williams wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:22:17 -0500
> >> > Manoj Srivastava
On 2009-08-13, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Maybe you should spend some time and read the thread before stating such
>> things.
> Really? So, they are already first-class deb packages?
Maybe you should spend some time and read the thread before stating such things.
> What percent of their (and
On Thu, Aug 13 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> If you think one should address content, and specific actions,
>> not personalities, your message does tend to inject personalities into
>> the discussion. Please cease doing so.
>
> Well, why a
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2009-08-13, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>>> Maybe you should spend some time and read the thread before stating such
>>> things.
>> Really? So, they are already first-class deb packages?
>
> Maybe you should spend some time and read the thread before stating such
> thing
On torsdagen den 30 juli 2009, Russell Coker wrote:
> http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/license/softwarelicense1-1.html
>
> I've packaged libdomainkeys for internal use and am considering adding a
> package that depends on it to Debian/Unstable. Is the domainkeys license
> suitable for inclusion i
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:04:34PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> retitle 485330 Allow context diff in debian/patches/ in 3.0 (quilt) format
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > That said, yes, using non-unified diff is as laughable as using RCS or
> > SCCS nowadays. Thoug
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
> I've been playing with WebDAV, which is an extension to HTTP. So I guess
> that will work with firewalls?
Yes, it should.
The only lingering concern that I have about a share is how it plays with
the files installed on your system via package. Can gdb be pointe
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:08:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
>
> > I've been playing with WebDAV, which is an extension to HTTP. So I guess
> > that will work with firewalls?
>
> Yes, it should.
>
> The only lingering concern that I have about a share is how it
Russ Allbery wrote:
> The only lingering concern that I have about a share is how it plays with
> the files installed on your system via package. Can gdb be pointed to
> multiple different debug information stores at different paths? Mounting
> a remote share over top of /usr/lib/debug obviously
Hi:
2009/8/12 Leinier Cruz Salfran :
> hello dd.
>
> 1- can i use 'piuparts' within 'pbuilder'?
For what it's worth, Ryan Niebur (Ryan52) -- NM and DD candidate --
has managed to hack piuparts to run inside a sbuild chroot. It runs
fairly slow (takes a few minutes) but isn't totally intolerable. I
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:17:55PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> First, the naming:
> It is indeed us Ftpmasters who want them named .ddeb. For two reasons -
> a simple one is that it makes the handling much easier, if you can match
> on *.ddeb$. Another one is that they aren't "real" debs like .de
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 06:53:04PM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> 2009/8/12 Leinier Cruz Salfran :
> > hello dd.
> >
> > 1- can i use 'piuparts' within 'pbuilder'?
> For what it's worth, Ryan Niebur (Ryan52) -- NM and DD candidate --
> has managed to hack piuparts to run inside a sbuild chroot.
Sound
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 443 (new: 81)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 127 (new: 5)
Total number of packages reques
Le Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:31:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> Hmm. As my memory serves me, the statement was:
>
> Message-Id: <125014.23574.10.ca...@shizuru>
> Fine. It's been several years now that managing the standards
> version has been an unconditional bump for
On Thu, Aug 13 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:31:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>> Hmm. As my memory serves me, the statement was:
>>
>> Message-Id: <125014.23574.10.ca...@shizuru>
>> Fine. It's been several years now that managing the standards
On Thu, Aug 13 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:31:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>> Hmm. As my memory serves me, the statement was:
>>
>> Message-Id: <125014.23574.10.ca...@shizuru>
>> Fine. It's been several years now that managing the standards
Hi,
Inadvertently, a draft copy of an email written in anger, and
not meant to be actually sent, was sent to the mailing list, instead
of a more reasoned response.
For that I apologize. You may see from the second response what
I meant to be public response, and the first emai
> <123direct...@gmail.com> *Hi All,*
>
> *Plz Add Me For All type of web solutions.*
>
> *Thanks. & Regards
> Ronald
>
> *
>
49 matches
Mail list logo
