Le Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:31:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > Hmm. As my memory serves me, the statement was: > > Message-Id: <1250148888.23574.10.ca...@shizuru> > >>>> Fine. It's been several years now that managing the standards > >>>> version has been an unconditional bump for me. > > Unconditional bump, I parsed, as merely bumping the version, > without regards to actual status (since otherwise it would have been > conditional on checking and making any relevant changes as required)
I am really, really, really tired to see long threads that start because one interpretes the words of another on a worst-case basis and gets offended by his own catastrophe scenario. It has been repeatedly said that the Policy is changed when most of the packages already conform to it. I prefer to interpret the above citation differently: that Josselin is proactively making his packages up to date, and that when a new Policy is published there is nothing to change in the package. If you had any doubt, you could have asked him in private, or in public if you had enough confidence that it would not have added noise with a conversation like ‘Are you sure you do your work correctly? Yes, I am sure, thank you’. This would have saved us your digressions about lies and expulsions. Please consider that this list is high traffic and try to limit your messages in quantity. It may even help you to have a nice day. -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
